-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
[Feature] refactor the connection properties #50238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
kind/feature
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Comments
This was referenced Apr 21, 2025
Merged
CalvinKirs
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 22, 2025
…ith Azure Support (#50220) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: #50238 Abstracted the endpoint matching and region extraction logic into a common utility method For object storage implementations compatible with the S3 protocol, the implementation class only needs to handle endpoint matching, while the parent class can take care of extracting the region and validating the endpoint. This approach helps eliminate a lot of redundant code.↳ Add Azure blob support - Abstracted the endpoint matching and region extraction logic into a common utility method For object storage implementations compatible with the S3 protocol, the implementation class only needs to handle endpoint matching, while the parent class can take care of extracting the region and validating the endpoint. This approach helps eliminate a lot of redundant code. - Add Azure blob support ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
16 tasks
morningman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 23, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: #50238 #### Background The current metastore configuration parameters are tightly coupled and difficult to maintain, with inconsistent mappings from user input. This complexity has led to confusion and reduced extensibility.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Search before asking
Description
No response
Use case
No response
Related issues
No response
Are you willing to submit PR?
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: