-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Feature request: add lane label to query related metrics #17767
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hi @applike-ss ,
|
Thank you for your feedback, in fact after adjusting the metrics mapping, i can also see the metric. I would like to see query count by lane, is that somehow possible? |
@applike-ss , glad that you could see the
I am afraid, right now it is not. During emission of @a2l007 , any additional thoughts? |
@ashwintumma23 Can the lane dimension be set in the future? We would like to be able to see the saturation of our lanes. |
It would be nice to have additional dimension support for |
Description
I would like to see the
lane
label on the prometheus metrics for queries.This will allow me to visualize the effectiveness and alert based on the usage of lanes.
Specifically when this issue gets tackled/integrated, it will become even more interesting: #6993
Motivation
Right now we can't visualize our query lane usage and can only adjust configuration based on guesses or metrics that we would let our developers have our apps emit.
In the future we don't want to have to write these metrics on our own, when druid is the more sensible way to write these metrics.
EDIT: It seems that this should already be the case as per the docs here: https://druid.apache.org/docs/latest/operations/metrics/
However, even though i fired a manual query against a datasource with laning set up and got a result row, I couldn't see a druid_query_priority metric coming from either broker or router.
What i do see however is a druid_sqlquery_time metric, so my metric collection seems to work fine.
Demo Query used:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: