|
| 1 | +.. contents:: Table of Contents |
| 2 | + :depth: 3 |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +========================= |
| 5 | +Reconciliation Framework |
| 6 | +========================= |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/topic:bug/8902 |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +This feature aims to overcome the drawbacks of the current reconciliation implementation. As part of this enhancement, |
| 11 | +reconciliation framework will be introduced which will coordinate the reconciliation across various applications. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +Applications should register themself with reconciliation framework with a specific priority. |
| 14 | +Application should decide the priority and the reconciliation framework will use it for executing in an priority. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Problem description |
| 18 | +=================== |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +When a switch connected to controller, the current ODL reconciliation implementation pushes all the |
| 21 | +table/meters/groups/flows from the inventory configuration datastore to the switch. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +When the switch is connected, all the applications including FRM(Forwarding Rules Manager) will receive the node added |
| 24 | +DTCN(Data Tree Change Listener) and starts pushing the flows for the openflow switch. FRM reconciliation will read the |
| 25 | +data from the config and starts pushing the flows one by one. |
| 26 | +In the meantime, applications can react to the node added DTCN change and will start pushing |
| 27 | +the flows through the config DS. With this, there is a high chance the application flow can be overwritten by the old |
| 28 | +flows by FRM via reconciliation. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +With framework, the problem will be avoided by doing the reconciliation for all the registered services including FRM |
| 31 | +and then the openflow switch will be submitted to the DS. With this, applications won't receive the node added DTCN until |
| 32 | +registered applications are done with reconciliation for the switch. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +The current reconciliation mechanism lacks an ordered execution of tasks across multiple applications resulting |
| 35 | +in the forwarding plane not correctly reflecting the changes in the control plane. |
| 36 | +The issue becomes more prominent in case of multi-application scenarios, resulting in errors. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +Use Cases |
| 39 | +--------- |
| 40 | +Priority based/Ordered Coordination of Reconciliation across multiple applications. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +Proposed change |
| 43 | +=============== |
| 44 | +1. Reconciliation Framework will be introduced, framework will coordinate the reconciliation across applications. |
| 45 | +The Openflow switch won't be advertised to application until Openflow switch is in KNOWN state. |
| 46 | + KNOWN state --> controller and switch state should be in sync(reconciliation), once the switch connects. |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +2. Application participating in reconciliation needs to register with framework. |
| 49 | + i) Application can either be FRM, FRS or any other application(s). |
| 50 | + ii) Application(s) registering with Reconciliation module is encouraged since: |
| 51 | + - Applications would know the right Flows/Groups/Meters which needs to be replayed (Add/Delete/Update). |
| 52 | + - FRM / FRS(Forwarding Rules Sync) would not have application view of flows / group, it would blindly |
| 53 | + replay the flows / groups. |
| 54 | + - Also flows having idle / hard timeout can be gracefully handled by application rather than FRM / FRS. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +3. As applications register with reconciliation module |
| 57 | + Reconciliation module maintains the numbers of application registered in an order based on the priority. |
| 58 | + Applications will be executed in the priority order of higher to lower, 1 - Highest n - lowest |
| 59 | + Reconciliation will be triggered as per the priority, applications with same priority will be processed in parallel, |
| 60 | + once the higher priority application completed, next priority of applications will be processed. |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +4. Openflow switch establishes connections with openflowplugin. |
| 63 | + Openflow switch sends connection request. |
| 64 | + Openflowplugin accepts connection and than establishes the connection. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +5. Openflowplugin after establishing the connection with openflow switch, elects the mastership and invokes |
| 67 | + reconciliation framework through ReconciliationFrameworkEvent onDevicePrepared. |
| 68 | + Before invoking the reconciliation API, all the RPCs are registered with MD-SAL by openflowplugin. |
| 69 | + Reconciliation framework will register itself with the MastershipChangeServiceManager. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +6. All registered applications would be indicated to start the reconciliation. |
| 72 | + DeviceInfo would be passed for the API/Event and it contains all the information needed by application. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +8. Application(s) would than fetch the flows / groups for that particular Node, which needs to be replayed. |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +9. Application(s) would than replay the selected flows / group on to the switch. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +10. Application(s) would also wait for error from switch, for pre-defined time. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +11. Application(s) would inform the reconciliation status to reconciliation module. |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +12. Reconciliation framework would co-relate result status from all the applications and decides the final status. |
| 83 | + If success, framework will report back DO_NOTHING and in case of failure it will be DISCONNECT. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +13. Based on result state, openflowplugin should do the following |
| 86 | + On success case, openflowplugin should continue with the openflow switch --> write the switch to the operational datastore. |
| 87 | + On failure case, openflowplugin should disconnect the openflow switch. |
| 88 | + When the switch reconnects, the same steps will be followed again. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +14. When there is a disconnect/mastership change while the reconciliation is going on, openflowplugin should notify the |
| 91 | + framework and the framework should halt the current reconciliation. |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +Implementation Details: |
| 94 | +----------------------- |
| 95 | +Following new interface will be introduced from Reconciliation framework (RF). |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +1. ReconciliationManager |
| 98 | +2. ReconciliationNotificationListener |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +1. ReconciliationManager |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | + /* Application who are interested in reconciliation should use this API to register themself to the RF */ |
| 103 | + /* NotificationRegistration will be return to the registered application, who needs to take of closing the registration */ |
| 104 | + NotificationRegistration registerService(ReconciliationNotificationListener object); |
| 105 | +
|
| 106 | + /* API exposed by RF for get list of registered services |
| 107 | + Map<Integer, List<ReconciliationNotificationListener>> getRegisteredServices(); |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +2. ReconciliationNotificationListener |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | + /* This method will be a callback from RF to start the application reconciliation */ |
| 112 | + ListenableFuture<Boolean> startReconciliation(DeviceInfo deviceInfo); |
| 113 | +
|
| 114 | + /* This method will be a callback from RF when openflow switch disconnects during reconcilation */ |
| 115 | + ListenableFuture<Boolean> endReconciliation(DeviceInfo deviceInfo); |
| 116 | +
|
| 117 | + /* Priority of the application */ |
| 118 | + int getPriority(); |
| 119 | +
|
| 120 | + /* Name of the application */ |
| 121 | + String getName(); |
| 122 | +
|
| 123 | + /* Application's intent when the application's reconciliation fails */ |
| 124 | + ResultState getResultState(); |
| 125 | +
|
| 126 | +Priority: |
| 127 | +--------- |
| 128 | +Framework will maintain the list of registered applications in an order based on the priority. Applications having the |
| 129 | +same priority will be executed in parallel and once those are done. Next priority applications will be called. |
| 130 | +Consider 2 applications, A and B. A is handling of programming groups and flows and B is handling of programming |
| 131 | +flows which is dependent of the groups programmed by A. So, B has to register with lower priority than A. |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +Application don't do any conflict resolution or guarantee any specific order among the application registered at the |
| 134 | +same priority level. |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +Result State - Intent Action: |
| 137 | +----------------------------- |
| 138 | +When the application fails to reconcile, what is the action that framework should take. |
| 139 | +DO_NOTHING - continue with the next reconciliation |
| 140 | +DISCONNECT - disconnect the switch (reconciliation will start again once the switch connects back) |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +Name: |
| 143 | +----- |
| 144 | +Name of the application who wants to register for reconciliation |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +ReconciliationNotificationListener: |
| 147 | +----------------------------------- |
| 148 | +Applications who wants to register should implement ReconciliationNotificationListener interface. |
| 149 | + ReconciliationNotificationListener having api's like startReconciliation and endReconciliation |
| 150 | + startReconciliation --> applications can take action to trigger reconciliation |
| 151 | + endReconciliation --> application can take action to cancel their current reconcile tasks |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +Command Line Interface (CLI): |
| 154 | +----------------------------- |
| 155 | +CLI interface will be provided to get all the registered services and their status |
| 156 | + List of registered services |
| 157 | + Status of each application for respective openflow switch |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +Pipeline changes |
| 161 | +---------------- |
| 162 | +None. |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +Yang changes |
| 165 | +------------ |
| 166 | +None |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +Configuration impact |
| 170 | +-------------------- |
| 171 | +None |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +Clustering considerations |
| 174 | +------------------------- |
| 175 | +None |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +Other Infra considerations |
| 178 | +-------------------------- |
| 179 | +N.A. |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +Security considerations |
| 182 | +----------------------- |
| 183 | +None. |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +Scale and Performance Impact |
| 186 | +---------------------------- |
| 187 | +None. |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +Targeted Release |
| 190 | +---------------- |
| 191 | +Nitrogen. |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +Alternatives |
| 194 | +------------ |
| 195 | +N.A. |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +Usage |
| 198 | +===== |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +Features to Install |
| 201 | +------------------- |
| 202 | +Will be updated |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | +REST API |
| 205 | +-------- |
| 206 | + |
| 207 | +CLI |
| 208 | +--- |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +Implementation |
| 211 | +============== |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +Assignee(s) |
| 214 | +----------- |
| 215 | +Primary assignee: |
| 216 | + - Prasanna Huddar( [email protected]) |
| 217 | + - Arunprakash D ( [email protected]) |
| 218 | + - Gobinath Suganthan ( [email protected]) |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +Other contributors: |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +Work Items |
| 224 | +---------- |
| 225 | +N.A. |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +Dependencies |
| 228 | +============ |
| 229 | +This doesn't add any new dependencies. |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +Testing |
| 233 | +======= |
| 234 | +Capture details of testing that will need to be added. |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | +Unit Tests |
| 237 | +---------- |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | +Integration Tests |
| 240 | +----------------- |
| 241 | + |
| 242 | +CSIT |
| 243 | +---- |
| 244 | + |
| 245 | +Documentation Impact |
| 246 | +==================== |
| 247 | +This feature will not require any change in User Guide. |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | +References |
| 251 | +========== |
| 252 | +[1] https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_OpenFlow_Plugin:Reconciliation#Future_Enhancements |
0 commit comments