Skip to content

Commit de78acd

Browse files
committed
fix recent typos causing invalid JSON
recent commit (dfc565c) edited Chapter 1, introducing typos and making it invalid JSON. This fixes those typos.
1 parent 267d562 commit de78acd

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

Chapter1_Introduction/Chapter1_Introduction.ipynb

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@
838838
"source": [
839839
"### Interpretation\n",
840840
"\n",
841-
"Recall that Bayesian methodology returns a *distribution*. Hence we now have distributions to describe the unknown $\lambda$s and $\\tau$. What have we gained? Immediately, we can see the uncertainty in our estimates: the wider the distribution, the less certain our posterior belief should be. We can also see what the plausible values for the parameters are: $\\lambda_1$ is around 18 and $\\lambda_2$ is around 23. The posterior distributions of the two $\\\\lambda$s are clearly distinct, indicating that it is indeed likely that there was a change in the user's text-message behaviour.\n",
841+
"Recall that Bayesian methodology returns a *distribution*. Hence we now have distributions to describe the unknown $\\lambda$s and $\\tau$. What have we gained? Immediately, we can see the uncertainty in our estimates: the wider the distribution, the less certain our posterior belief should be. We can also see what the plausible values for the parameters are: $\\lambda_1$ is around 18 and $\\lambda_2$ is around 23. The posterior distributions of the two $\\lambda$s are clearly distinct, indicating that it is indeed likely that there was a change in the user's text-message behaviour.\n",
842842
"\n",
843843
"What other observations can you make? If you look at the original data again, do these results seem reasonable? \n",
844844
"\n",

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)