fixing issue CamDavidsonPilon#129

Author: CamDavidsonPilon

Chapter1_Introduction/Chapter1_Introduction.ipynb

@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
      "cell_type": "markdown",
      "metadata": {},
      "source": [
-      "The posterior probabilities are represented by the curves, and our confidence is proportional to the width of the curve. As the plot above shows, as we start to observe data our posterior probabilities start to shift and move around. Eventually, as we observe more and more data (coin-flips), our probabilities will tighten closer and closer around the true value of $p=0.5$ (marked by a dashed line). \n",
+      "The posterior probabilities are represented by the curves, and our uncertainty is proportional to the width of the curve. As the plot above shows, as we start to observe data our posterior probabilities start to shift and move around. Eventually, as we observe more and more data (coin-flips), our probabilities will tighten closer and closer around the true value of $p=0.5$ (marked by a dashed line). \n",
       "\n",
       "Notice that the plots are not always *peaked* at 0.5. There is no reason it should be: recall we assumed we did not have a prior opinion of what $p$ is. In fact, if we observe quite extreme data, say 8 flips and only 1 observed heads, our distribution would look very biased *away* from lumping around 0.5 (with no prior opinion, how confident would you feel betting on a fair coin after observing 8 tails and 1 head). As more data accumulates, we would see more and more probability being assigned at $p=0.5$, though never all of it.\n",
       "\n",
@@ -1027,4 +1027,4 @@
    "metadata": {}
   }
  ]
-}
+}