Skip to content

Make JSON-RPC ID type coercion configurable #1795

@maxisbey

Description

@maxisbey

Background

PR #1720 added automatic type coercion for JSON-RPC response IDs, allowing string IDs like "0" to match integer request IDs like 0. This makes the client more tolerant of servers that echo back IDs in a different but semantically equivalent format.

Spec Language

Per the JSON-RPC 2.0 and MCP specifications, response IDs should be exact matches:

JSON-RPC 2.0: Response ID "MUST be the same as the value of the id member in the Request Object"

MCP Spec:

  • Result responses "MUST include the same ID as the request they correspond to"
  • Error responses "MUST include the same ID as the request they correspond to"

The language "same as the value" / "same ID" implies exact matching including type. The spec does not describe IDs as opaque and does not mandate type conversion or normalization. Servers should echo back the exact ID they received.

Current Behavior

PR #1720 makes the client more lenient by accepting type-coerced IDs (e.g., "0" matching 0). This is a workaround for non-compliant servers.

Proposal

Make this ID type coercion behavior configurable:

This could be exposed as a session or client configuration option, defaulting to lenient for backwards compatibility.

Ideally strict mode is default, with an error message being clear as to why something fails. If we receive a response with an ID that's a string, even though the original request ID was an int we could first check if there are any IDs which would match after type coercion and then include that in the error message. "Request ID with same value of different type found, but ignored due to strict ID matching configuration".

Reasoning

By spec language, request ID 1 and request ID "1" are different IDs, but with this type coercion they are treated as the same. Given that many clients/servers are non-compliant with this anyway and do their own type conversions we should allow server/client users of the SDK to configure the behaviour for themselves.

Related

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    P3Nice to haves, rare edge casesbugSomething isn't workingv2Ideas, requests and plans for v2 of the SDK which will incorporate major changes and fixes

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions