Skip to content

Commit 5eba1b1

Browse files
committed
Punch up the intro a bit more
1 parent 6588ecb commit 5eba1b1

File tree

1 file changed

+6
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+6
-4
lines changed

_posts/2019-12-03-managing-pagerduty-rotations.md

Lines changed: 6 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -10,13 +10,15 @@ team: Core Platform
1010
---
1111

1212
Nobody likes to be woken up in the middle of the night, but if you've got to do
13-
it, make sure you pick the right person. Scribd has long used
13+
it, make sure you pick the right person to solve the problem. Scribd has long used
1414
[PagerDuty](https://pagerduty.com) for managing on-call rotations, but only
1515
within the "Core Infrastructure" team. All production incidents were routed to
16-
a single group of infrastructure engineers. Clearly not a good idea. To help
16+
a single group of infrastructure engineers rather than developers who were
17+
committing code to the service. Clearly not a good idea. To help
1718
with our migration to AWS, we recognized the need to move to a more
18-
_distributed_ model of incident response, and the Core Platform team ended up
19-
being a suitable test subject.
19+
_distributed_ model of incident response, with developers taking on more
20+
responsibility. We needed to try something different and the Core Platform team
21+
ended up being a suitable test subject for our experiments.
2022

2123

2224
The idea of transitioning from "nobody is on-call" to "everybody is on-call"

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)