Merge pull request BonsaiDen#225 from lolikung/master

fix typo

Author: timruffles

doc/zhtw/core/undefined.md

@@ -43,13 +43,11 @@ JavaScript 中有兩個表示空值的方式， `null` 和 `undefined` ， `unde
 
     })('Hello World', 42);
 
-唯一的不同就是在下者會多 4 個多 bytes 用來壓縮檔案，而且函數內野沒有其他需要使用 `var`
+唯一的不同就是在下者會多 4 個多 bytes 用來壓縮檔案，而且函數內也沒有其他需要使用 `var`
 
 ### 使用 `null`
 
 JavaScript 中所使用的 `undefined` 類似別的語言中的 *null* , 但實際上在 JavaScript 中的 `null` 算是另外一個類型。
 
 它在 JavaScript 有些可以使用的地方 （例如說宣告一個原型的終結，例如 `Foo.prototype = null` ）。
 但是在大部分的時候可以用 `undefined`，來取代。
-
-

doc/zhtw/other/timeouts.md

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
         clearTimeout(i);
     }
 
-可能還有一些定石器不會在上面的代碼中被清除，因此我們可以事先保存所有的定時器 ID，然後一把清除。
+可能還有一些定時器不會在上面的代碼中被清除，因此我們可以事先保存所有的定時器 ID，然後一把清除。
 
 
     // clear "all" timeouts
@@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ This feature should **never** be used because it internally makes use of `eval`.
     }
     bar();
 
-Since `eval` is not getting called [directly](#core.eval) in this case, the string 
-passed to `setTimeout` will be executed in the *global scope*; thus, it will 
+Since `eval` is not getting called [directly](#core.eval) in this case, the string
+passed to `setTimeout` will be executed in the *global scope*; thus, it will
 not use the local variable `foo` from the scope of `bar`.
 
 It is further recommended to **not** use a string to pass arguments to the
-function that will get called by either of the timeout functions. 
+function that will get called by either of the timeout functions.
 
     function foo(a, b, c) {}
-    
+
     // NEVER use this
     setTimeout('foo(1, 2, 3)', 1000)
 
@@ -122,19 +122,18 @@ function that will get called by either of the timeout functions.
         foo(a, b, c);
     }, 1000)
 
-> **Note:** While it is also possible to use the syntax 
+> **Note:** While it is also possible to use the syntax
 > `setTimeout(foo, 1000, a, b, c)`, it is not recommended, as its use may lead
-> to subtle errors when used with [methods](#function.this). 
+> to subtle errors when used with [methods](#function.this).
 
 ### In Conclusion
 
-A string should **never** be used as the parameter of `setTimeout` or 
-`setInterval`. It is a clear sign of **really** bad code, when arguments need 
+A string should **never** be used as the parameter of `setTimeout` or
+`setInterval`. It is a clear sign of **really** bad code, when arguments need
 to be supplied to the function that gets called. An *anonymous function* should
 be passed that then takes care of the actual call.
 
 Furthermore, the use of `setInterval` should be avoided because its scheduler is not
 blocked by executing JavaScript.
 
 [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Object_Model "Document Object Model"
-