Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
C# vs XML: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will explore the key differences between C# and XML. C# is a programming language developed by Microsoft, while XML (Extensible Markup Language) is a markup language used to store and transport data. Understanding the differences between these two technologies is important for developers who work with both.
Syntax: The most obvious difference between C# and XML is the syntax. C# follows a specific set of rules and conventions for writing code, including the use of semicolons, braces, and keywords. On the other hand, XML uses a tag-based syntax, with elements enclosed in angle brackets, and allows for nesting and hierarchical structure.
Purpose: C# is a programming language used for developing software applications, whereas XML is a markup language designed primarily for storing and transporting data. C# allows developers to write executable code that can perform calculations, manipulate data, and interact with the system, while XML focuses on organizing and describing data in a human-readable format.
Execution: C# code is compiled into an executable program that can be run by a computer. It is a strongly-typed language that requires the code to be checked for type safety before execution. XML, on the other hand, is not executed directly. It serves as a data format that can be processed by other applications, such as web browsers or database systems.
Flexibility: C# offers various programming constructs, including classes, methods, loops, and conditional statements, allowing for complex logic and control flow. It also supports object-oriented programming principles, such as inheritance and polymorphism. XML, on the other hand, is a markup language that focuses on data organization and does not provide programming constructs like loops or conditionals. It is primarily used for structuring data in a hierarchical manner.
Data Types: C# has a rich set of data types, including integers, floating-point numbers, strings, and booleans. It also allows for the creation of custom data types using classes and structures. XML, on the other hand, treats all data as text by default. While it is possible to define data types in XML using XML Schema Definition (XSD), XML itself does not enforce strict typing.
Serialization: C# provides built-in support for serialization, which allows objects to be converted into a binary or textual representation for storage or transmission. XML, on the other hand, is often used as a format for serializing data. It provides a standardized way to represent complex data structures and allows for easy exchange of data between different systems.
In summary, C# is a programming language used for developing software applications, while XML is a markup language used for organizing and describing data. C# is executed directly and offers more flexibility in terms of logic and control flow, while XML serves as a data format and focuses on hierarchical data organization.
In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.
To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.
Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.
For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.
That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.
We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.
As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.
C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.
Pros of C#
- Cool syntax351
- Great lambda support293
- Great generics support266
- Language integrated query (linq)211
- Extension methods180
- Automatic garbage collection94
- Properties with get/set methods89
- Backed by microsoft84
- Automatic memory management71
- Amaizing Crossplatform Support61
- High performance46
- LINQ43
- Beautiful38
- Great ecosystem of community packages with Nuget35
- Vibrant developer community27
- Great readability24
- Dead-simple asynchronous programming with async/await21
- Visual Studio - Great IDE19
- Open source17
- Productive16
- Strongly typed by default, dynamic typing when needed15
- Object oriented programming paradigm15
- Easy separation of config/application code12
- Great community11
- OOPS simplified with great syntax10
- Operator overloading9
- Cool9
- Good language to teach OO concepts8
- High-performance8
- Events management using delegates8
- Unity7
- Linq expressions7
- Conditional compilation6
- Coherent language backed by an extensive CLR6
- Top level code5
- Organized and clean5
- Comprehensive platform libraries5
- Concise syntax, productivity designed4
- Lovely3
- Statically typed2
- Far more sleek and sphisticated than other languages1
- Simple and Readable1
- Sophisticated overall1
- Interfaces1
- Interfaces0
Pros of XML
- Fun2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of C#
- Poor x-platform GUI support15
- Closed source8
- Fast and secure7
- Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma7