Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Loose ends in PG XML patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Loose ends in PG XML patch
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Loose ends in PG XML patch  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> * Shouldn't the xml type support binary I/O?  Right now it is the only
> standard datatype that doesn't.  I have no idea whether there is an
> appropriate representation besides text, but if not we could define the
> binary representation to be the same as text.

There is an effort to develop a binary xml format:

http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-characterization/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sync Scan update
Next
From: Jeremy Drake
Date:
Subject: contrib regression failures after recent money type changes