Re: pg_terminate_backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_terminate_backend
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_terminate_backend  (Csaba Nagy <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Csaba Nagy <[email protected]> writes:
> I do know a case where a plain kill will seem to be stucked: on vacuum
> of a big table. I guess when it starts an index's cleanup scan it will
> insist to finish it before stopping.

We've fixed a few cases of missing CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS lately, and will
fix more if you can point them out.  Note though that SIGTERM is just as
vulnerable to that as SIGINT.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpg test suite
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_terminate_backend