Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle  (Tom Lane <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This would all be a little easier to accomplish if the behavior were
> made to be implicit in the rewriter (ie, rewrite instead of throwing a
> "no rule" error), since then there is no persistent state that a GUC or
> reloption would have to try to add or get rid of.

why we don't follow this path from the beggining?
what are the pros and cons of this?

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp)
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)