Re: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi Kuroda-san,

> This feature, committed last February, has some bugs.
> ...
> * This syntax does not have oracle compatibility.

This in itself is not a bug. If the syntax is not standard compliant,
then it's a bug. That of course does not mean we would not like to be
Oracle compatible where possible.

> In order to modify bugs, I think many designs, implementations, 
> and specifications should be changed.

I hope the authors of said patch speak up and explain why they
implemented it as is.

> Is it acceptable for PG12?

In general absolutely.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Write visibility map during CLUSTER/VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.