Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATH] Correct negative/zero year into_date/to_timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yury Zhuravlev
Subject Re: [PATH] Correct negative/zero year into_date/to_timestamp
Date
Msg-id [email protected]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATH] Correct negative/zero year in to_date/to_timestamp  (Vitaly Burovoy <[email protected]>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
>But I'm waiting for a discussion: what part should be changed?

I for compliance with the standard (all ISO). In addition Oracle uses
"IYYY" format.
Standards allow to reduce liability. But I think someone like Tom Lane can
have the final say because we break backward compatibility.
Options "year"/"isoyear" may confuse the users.

Thanks.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: get oldest LSN - function
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation cache invalidation on replica