Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

24 October 2010

• 01:04   Re: WIP: extensible enums Robert Haas
• 01:08   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 01:26   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 01:57   Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) Robert Haas
• 02:11   Re: WIP: extensible enums Robert Haas
• 03:21   Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) Terry Laurenzo
• 04:32   Re: ask for review of MERGE Greg Stark
• 04:41   Re: WIP: extensible enums Greg Stark
• 06:50   Re: ask for review of MERGE Martijn van Oosterhout
• 08:52   Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage Hsien-Wen Chu
• 09:01   Re: WIP: extensible enums Dean Rasheed
• 09:05   Re: ask for review of MERGE Robert Haas
• 09:12   Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) Robert Haas
• 09:16   Re: knngist - 0.8 Robert Haas
• 09:44   planner row-estimates for tsvector seems horribly wrong Sushant Sinha
• 09:57   Re: planner row-estimates for tsvector seems horribly wrong Jan Urbański
• 10:07   Re: planner row-estimates for tsvector seems horribly wrong Jan Urbański
• 12:26   Re: planner row-estimates for tsvector seems horribly wrong Sushant Sinha
• 13:17   Re: ask for review of MERGE Greg Smith
• 13:20   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 13:29   Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage Tom Lane
• 13:36   Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP) Terry Laurenzo
• 13:48   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 13:59   Re: WIP: extensible enums Dean Rasheed
• 14:43   Re: ask for review of MERGE Robert Haas
• 14:50   Re: xlog.c: WALInsertLock vs. WALWriteLock Tallat Mahmood
• 16:28   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 16:33   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 16:42   typenameTypeId refactoring Peter Eisentraut
• 17:13   Segfault in 9.0 inlining SRF Brendan Jurd
• 17:36   Re: [BUGS] Segfault in 9.0 inlining SRF Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: typenameTypeId refactoring Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 18:22   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 18:31   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 18:31   Re: [BUGS] Segfault in 9.0 inlining SRF Brendan Jurd
• 18:34   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 18:40   why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Jan Urbański
• 18:40   Re: ask for review of MERGE Greg Smith
• 19:04   Range Types, discrete and/or continuous Jeff Davis
• 19:17   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 19:44   Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Tom Lane
• 19:59   Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Andrew Dunstan
• 20:12   Re: ask for review of MERGE Greg Stark
• 20:17   Re: ask for review of MERGE Greg Stark
• 20:24   Re: Serializable snapshot isolation patch Kevin Grittner
• 20:50   Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Tom Lane
• 21:12   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 21:25   Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Andrew Dunstan
• 21:55   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 22:04   Re: Extensions, this time with a patch Itagaki Takahiro
• 22:21   Re: WIP: extensible enums Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: Extensions, this time with a patch Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Tom Lane
• 22:38   Re: WIP: extensible enums Andrew Dunstan
• 22:59   Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger Andrew Dunstan
• 23:40   Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous Robert Haas