Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 April 2014

• 00:07   Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD Andrew Dunstan
• 00:07   Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 00:17   Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 00:19   Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 Josh Berkus
• 00:22   What use case is make_tuple_indirect() supposed to illustrate? Tom Lane
• 00:47   Re: [GENERAL] aggregate returning anyarray and 'cannot determine result data type' Tom Lane
• 00:50   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Tom Lane
• 01:00   Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD Mark Kirkwood
• 01:33   pg_upgrade and epoch Sergey Burladyan
• 02:25   Re: Missing pfree in logical_heap_rewrite_flush_mappings() Bruce Momjian
• 02:37   Re: Missing pfree in logical_heap_rewrite_flush_mappings() Tom Lane
• 02:39   Re: pg_upgrade and epoch Sergey Konoplev
• 03:08   Re: pg_upgrade and epoch Sergey Burladyan
• 03:49   Re: pg_upgrade and epoch Sergey Konoplev
• 04:17   Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
• 05:55   Re: How can we make beta testing better? Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
• 06:11   9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Simon Riggs
• 06:14   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Tom Lane
• 06:45   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Craig Ringer
• 07:14   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Pavel Stehule
• 07:21   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Albe Laurenz
• 07:39   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Craig Ringer
• 07:47   Re: Minor improvements in alter_table.sgml Etsuro Fujita
• 07:51   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Simon Riggs
• 07:58   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Albe Laurenz
• 08:04   Re: What use case is make_tuple_indirect() supposed to illustrate? Andres Freund
• 08:11   Re: Missing pfree in logical_heap_rewrite_flush_mappings() Andres Freund
• 08:20   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Petr Jelinek
• 08:26   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table David Rowley
• 08:46   Re: CREATE FOREIGN TABLE ( ... LIKE ... ) Etsuro Fujita
• 09:15   Typo in doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml? s/tranche/trance? Amit Langote
• 09:19   Re: Typo in doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml? s/tranche/trance? Amit Langote
• 09:34   Runing DBT2 on Postgresql Rohit Goyal
• 09:37   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Hannu Krosing
• 10:01   Re: Typo in doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml? s/tranche/trance? Heikki Linnakangas
• 10:56   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Bruce Momjian
• 11:39   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Simon Riggs
• 11:46   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Mark Kirkwood
• 12:18   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Michael Paquier
• 12:25   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Stephen Frost
• 12:26   Re: pg_upgrade and epoch Bruce Momjian
• 12:44   Re: WAL replay bugs Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:46   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:57   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Thom Brown
• 12:59   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Stephen Frost
• 13:51   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Alvaro Herrera
• 14:07   Re: [GENERAL] aggregate returning anyarray and 'cannot determine result data type' Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Alexander Korotkov
• 15:20   Review: ECPG FETCH readahead Antonin Houska
• 15:24   Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead Alvaro Herrera
• 15:37   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 16:41   Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 17:03   Re: assertion failure 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 17:23   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Josh Berkus
• 17:27   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table Alvaro Herrera
• 18:01   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:28   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 18:47   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Bruce Momjian
• 18:51   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 19:13   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Andres Freund
• 19:24   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table David Fetter
• 19:30   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Alvaro Herrera
• 19:42   Re: pg_upgrade and epoch Sergey Konoplev
• 21:34   Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4 Andres Freund
• 21:39   All caught up Bruce Momjian *EXTERN*
• 22:06   Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead Antonin Houska
• 22:15   Re: Review: ECPG FETCH readahead Antonin Houska
• 23:25   Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table David Fetter