Mailing lists [pgsql-patches]

1 May 2003

• 05:15   Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" Nigel J. Andrews
• 10:00   Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" Tom Lane
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" (replacement) Nigel J. Andrews
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" (replacement) Nigel J. Andrews
• 13:54   Re: [HACKERS] "Adding missing from clause" Josh Berkus
• 16:13   GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 23:41   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian

2 May 2003

• 00:01   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 00:15   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 00:23   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 06:02   Simple LRU for clog and (later) subtrans Manfred Koizar
• 15:48   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 18:11   Clog handling on exec'ed backend Bruce Momjian
• 22:04   Re: Clog handling on exec'ed backend Tom Lane
• 22:32   Re: Clog handling on exec'ed backend Bruce Momjian
• 23:59   Re: Clog handling on exec'ed backend Bruce Momjian

3 May 2003

• 01:14   Cleanup for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 03:28   apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Bradley Baetz
• 11:07   contrib/tablefunc bugfix Joe Conway
• 13:22   Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: contrib/tablefunc bugfix Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:27   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 17:36   Re: [JDBC] refcursor result set patch Barry Lind
• 20:16   Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Bradley Baetz
• 20:53   Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Tom Lane
• 21:15   Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Bradley Baetz
• 22:10   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 23:08   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 23:43   Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Bradley Baetz

4 May 2003

• 00:43   Disable alternate locations on Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 02:15   Re: contrib/tablefunc bugfix Joe Conway
• 10:05   Re: Disable alternate locations on Win32 Tom Lane
• 10:27   Re: apply outer->inner join optimisation to OR clauses Tom Lane
• 16:54   Patch for PGunescapeBytea Ben Lamb
• 20:50   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway

5 May 2003

• 11:57   Add pg_catalog to pltcl code Greg Sabino Mullane
• 12:25   Re: Disable alternate locations on Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 12:46   Re: Patch for PGunescapeBytea Magnus Naeslund(f)
• 13:59   Re: Patch for PGunescapeBytea Ben Lamb
• 19:08   Re: Simple LRU for clog and (later) subtrans Manfred Koizar

6 May 2003

• 00:13   Cleanup of fork/exec Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Global variables in exec() Bruce Momjian
• 01:28   Re: Global variables in exec() Tom Lane
• 11:21   Re: Global variables in exec() Bruce Momjian
• 19:35   Re: Global variables in exec() Bruce Momjian
• 23:51   Re: Disable alternate locations on Win32 Bruce Momjian

7 May 2003

• 00:12   Re: Disable alternate locations on Win32 Tom Lane
• 01:28   pg_autovacuum update Matthew T. O'Connor
• 16:49   Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Jason Tishler
• 23:33   Pass shared memory address to exec'ed backend Bruce Momjian

8 May 2003

• 06:54   Re: Patch for PGunescapeBytea Ben Lamb
• 08:09   Re: 2nd nested trasanctions supporting patch Alvaro Herrera
• 08:20   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Jan Wieck
• 09:48   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 09:59   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 11:41   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Jan Wieck
• 11:49   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 13:31   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Jan Wieck
• 13:50   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Tom Lane
• 15:18   Cleanup of shared memory attach Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: GUC patch for Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 20:50   psql: tab completion for \encoding Ian Barwick

9 May 2003

• 12:11   Static snapshot data Manfred Koizar
• 23:09   Re: Static snapshot data Tom Lane

12 May 2003

• 02:53   Re: Static snapshot data Manfred Koizar
• 09:40   Re: Static snapshot data Tom Lane
• 09:55   SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Rod Taylor
• 10:59   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Tom Lane
• 12:15   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Rod Taylor
• 13:21   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Rod Taylor
• 17:13   CIDR addresses in pg_hba.conf Andrew Dunstan

13 May 2003

• 05:09   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Hannu Krosing
• 08:41   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Rod Taylor
• 10:11   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Hannu Krosing
• 10:15   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Hannu Krosing
• 10:59   Re: SQL99 CREATE TABLE ... (LIKE parent_table) Rod Taylor

14 May 2003

• 10:25   Re: contrib/tablefunc bugfix Tom Lane
• 10:27   Re: contrib/tablefunc bugfix Tom Lane
• 10:33   IPv6 (what ISC is running) Michael Graff

15 May 2003

• 00:59   Re: contrib/tablefunc bugfix Joe Conway
• 01:10   Re: contrib/tablefunc bugfix Tom Lane
• 13:52   Win32 patch to allow compilation Bruce Momjian
• 15:24   Patch to copy dirs Bruce Momjian
• 17:44   Removal of krb4 support... Sean Chittenden

16 May 2003

• 00:55   fix for krb5 breakage Joe Conway
• 01:51   tablefunc bugfix (was Re: [HACKERS] Heads up: 7.3.3 this Wednesday) Joe Conway
• 02:08   Re: tablefunc bugfix (was Re: [HACKERS] Heads up: 7.3.3 this Wednesday) Tom Lane
• 09:37   Re: Add pg_catalog to pltcl code Tom Lane
• 09:38   Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation Peter Eisentraut
• 09:41   Re: Removal of krb4 support... Peter Eisentraut
• 10:58   Re: Removal of krb4 support... Tom Lane
• 11:34   Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation Bruce Momjian
• 13:53   Re: Removal of krb4 support... Sean Chittenden

19 May 2003

• 18:07   Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Jason Tishler
• 18:11   Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation Bruce Momjian
• 18:27   Re: Win32 patch to allow compilation Peter Eisentraut
• 19:53   Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch Bruce Momjian

21 May 2003

• 03:06   ipv6 patch #3 Michael Graff
• 13:07   JDBC: Wrong type Fernando Nasser
• 20:00   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway

22 May 2003

• 01:24   LIKE (second attempt) Rod Taylor
• 09:23   ALTER SEQUENCE updates Rod Taylor
• 11:41   CVSup doc correction (minor) Rod Taylor
• 11:54   JDBC: Better initial capacity for StringBuffers reduces memory usage Fernando Nasser
• 22:42   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway

23 May 2003

• 01:22   pgstattuple for schemas Rod Taylor
• 10:19   Re: pgstattuple for schemas Tom Lane
• 10:23   Re: pgstattuple for schemas Rod Taylor
• 10:53   JDBC: Wrong type Fernando Nasser

24 May 2003

• 00:45   Re: [SQL] noupcol code cleanup Bruce Momjian
• 01:03   Re: updated win32 patch Bruce Momjian
• 07:55   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Peter Eisentraut
• 09:50   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 10:51   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: XML ouput for psql Bruce Momjian
• 16:50   Re: Domain casting still not working right? Rod Taylor
• 17:41   Re: Domain casting still not working right? Tom Lane
• 21:46   plpq for dblink Bruce Momjian

25 May 2003

• 01:30   cleanup of cbrt() handling Bruce Momjian
• 02:05   Re: cleanup of cbrt() handling Tom Lane
• 09:12   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Peter Eisentraut
• 09:12   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Peter Eisentraut
• 09:35   Re: updated win32 patch Jan Wieck
• 10:06   Re: cleanup of cbrt() handling Bruce Momjian
• 10:57   Re: cleanup of cbrt() handling Tom Lane
• 11:02   Re: updated win32 patch Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 13:52   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 20:45   Re: cleanup of cbrt() handling Bruce Momjian
• 21:47   Re: plpq for dblink Darko Prenosil

26 May 2003

• 01:01   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Bruce Momjian
• 02:31   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Tom Lane
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Rod Taylor
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 13:55   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Rod Taylor
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 14:20   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Rod Taylor
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Tom Lane
• 14:28   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG thread-safety Bruce Momjian
• 19:32   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Peter Eisentraut
• 22:06   New translation Tebaldi Mirko
• 22:33   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) Bruce Momjian
• 22:36   Re: New translation Alvaro Herrera
• 22:52   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) Tom Lane
• 23:50   Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor
• 23:59   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages Bruce Momjian

27 May 2003

• 00:13   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) Tom Lane
• 00:21   Re: Sequence usage patch Tom Lane
• 00:42   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages Bruce Momjian
• 02:07   Re: Sequence usage patch Gavin Sherry
• 09:41   Re: Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor
• 09:51   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) Tom Lane
• 09:57   Re: Sequence usage patch Tom Lane
• 10:03   Re: Sequence usage patch Rod Taylor
• 12:15   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages Bruce Momjian
• 12:49   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) Tom Lane
• 12:54   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages Bruce Momjian
• 13:55   Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages Bruce Momjian
• 15:39   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Peter Eisentraut

28 May 2003

• 11:07   JDBC: Reinstate autocommit client hack for 7.4 Fernando Nasser
• 14:00   JDBC: Reinstate autocommit client hack for 7.4 Fernando Nasser
• 14:17   JDBC: LONGVARBINARY upload patch Fernando Nasser
• 14:50   JDBC: LONGVARBINARY upload patch Fernando Nasser
• 15:26   Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase Ben Lamb
• 16:31   Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase Matthew T. O'Connor
• 16:51   Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase Andrew Dunstan
• 17:03   Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase Ben Lamb
• 17:09   Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase Matthew T. O'Connor
• 17:51   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Peter Eisentraut
• 17:52   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Peter Eisentraut
• 18:11   Re: Lonely Patch Seeks Long-Term Commitment to Codebase Bruce Momjian
• 18:33   Re: Adding Rendezvous support to postmaster Peter Bierman

29 May 2003

• 00:49   Re: [JDBC] JDBC: Better initial capacity for StringBuffers reduces Barry Lind
• 00:53   Re: JDBC: Wrong type Barry Lind
• 01:42   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 11:57   JDBC: One more autocommit use to work around Fernando Nasser
• 11:58   Re: JDBC: One more autocommit use to work around Barry Lind
• 12:13   JDBC: Updated LONGVARBINARY upload patch Fernando Nasser
• 15:58   Array.getArray () Dmitry Tkach

30 May 2003

• 15:06   Re: XML ouput for psql [email protected]
• 16:20   Re: XML ouput for psql Sean Chittenden
• 21:26   Re: FK on update no action patch Bruce Momjian
• 22:15   Re: ipv6 patch #3 Bruce Momjian
• 22:20   Re: Slightly improved SSL bits... Bruce Momjian
• 22:22   Re: Resend of encoding docs patch Bruce Momjian
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Bruce Momjian

31 May 2003

• 06:36   Re: XML ouput for psql Hannu Krosing
• 11:52   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:50   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Tom Lane
• 17:43   array support phase 3 patch (was Re: array support patch phase 1 patch) Joe Conway
• 21:30   Re: array support patch phase 1 patch Joe Conway
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Sean Chittenden
• 23:09   Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum? Rod Taylor
• 23:50   Re: log_min_duration_statement #2 Bruce Momjian