Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
| От | Marina Polyakova |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors (Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> >> P.S. Does this use case (do not retry transaction with serialization or >> >> deadlock failure) is most interesting or failed transactions should be >> >> retried (and how much times if there seems to be no hope of success...)? >> > >> > I can't quite parse that sentence, could you restate? >> >> The way I read it was that the most interesting solution would retry >> a transaction from the beginning on a serialization failure or >> deadlock failure. > > As far as I understand her proposal, it is exactly the opposite -- if a > transaction fails, it is discarded. And this P.S. note is asking > whether this is a good idea, or would we prefer that failing > transactions are retried. Yes, I have meant this, thank you! > I think it's pretty obvious that transactions that failed with > some serializability problem should be retried. Thank you voted :) -- Marina Polyakova Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: