Re: more RLS oversights
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: more RLS oversights |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: more RLS oversights (Robert Haas <[email protected]>) |
| Ответы |
Re: more RLS oversights
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Joe Conway <[email protected]> wrote: > > The equivalent message for functions is: > > ".. are not allowed in functions in FROM" > > > > So how does this sound: > > "... are not allowed in policies in USING and WITH CHECK expressions" > > or perhaps more simply: > > "... are not allowed in policies in USING and WITH CHECK" > > Awkward. The "in policies in" phrasing is just hard to read. Yeah. Besides, it's not really the same thing. > Why not just "in policy expressions"? There's no third kind that does > allow these. WFM -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: