Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | [email protected] обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog (Robert Treat <[email protected]>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat wrote: > While I don't disagree that this is an important feature, the fact that it is > being designed with pgadmin specific backwards compatability (for example the > functions that rename core functions) leaves me dubious as to it being a more > general solution. Because of that I would be comfortable with acting on #3. The rename happened because when one of the functions was moved into core, someone decided to rename it along the way which broke compatibility with previous versions of pgAdmin. Whilst I won't in any way deny that the adminpack was specifically written for pgAdmin though, I have no problem with it being enhanced to provide non-core functionality for other admin tools in the future... in fact I would encourage it. I think it's better to support as many admin tools as possible from one contrib module, rather than for each tool to have it's own. Regards Dave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: