Google Git
Sign in
android/kernel/common/a130d07d24b95f5b807dd89b9d2302a873ba3bec
commit
a130d07d24b95f5b807dd89b9d2302a873ba3bec
[log]
author
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Wed May 21 14:45:30 2025 +0000
committer
Lee Jones <joneslee@google.com>
Tue Jun 24 01:20:50 2025 -0700
tree
e894b0dbab1a1a9968b8a6ddc5ca74ab9af92f97
parent
5ada288086f00785b8d777e0a124de9e25660af8 [diff]
UPSTREAM: af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc_lock during accept().

commit fd86344823b521149bb31d91eba900ba3525efa6 upstream.

Commit dcf70df2048d ("af_unix: Fix up unix_edge.successor for embryo
socket.") added spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock) in accept() path, and it
caused regression in a stress test as reported by kernel test robot.

If the embryo socket is not part of the inflight graph, we need not
hold the lock.

To decide that in O(1) time and avoid the regression in the normal
use case,

  1. add a new stat unix_sk(sk)->scm_stat.nr_unix_fds

  2. count the number of inflight AF_UNIX sockets in the receive
     queue under unix_state_lock()

  3. move unix_update_edges() call under unix_state_lock()

  4. avoid locking if nr_unix_fds is 0 in unix_update_edges()

Bug: 404256079
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202404101427.92a08551-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240413021928.20946-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3600729b7fc0564ccb1ceec493fa446858b6d95b)
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <joneslee@google.com>
Change-Id: Id4a64f2453d757bb947259a106376d30a20218bb
5 files changed
tree: e894b0dbab1a1a9968b8a6ddc5ca74ab9af92f97
  1. android/
  2. arch/
  3. block/
  4. certs/
  5. crypto/
  6. Documentation/
  7. drivers/
  8. fs/
  9. include/
  10. init/
  11. io_uring/
  12. ipc/
  13. kernel/
  14. lib/
  15. LICENSES/
  16. mm/
  17. net/
  18. rust/
  19. samples/
  20. scripts/
  21. security/
  22. sound/
  23. tools/
  24. usr/
  25. virt/
  26. .bazelignore
  27. .clang-format
  28. .cocciconfig
  29. .get_maintainer.ignore
  30. .gitattributes
  31. .gitignore
  32. .mailmap
  33. .rustfmt.toml
  34. abi.bzl
  35. BUILD.bazel
  36. build.config.aarch64
  37. build.config.allmodconfig
  38. build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64
  39. build.config.allmodconfig.arm
  40. build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64
  41. build.config.amlogic
  42. build.config.arm
  43. build.config.common
  44. build.config.constants
  45. build.config.crashdump
  46. build.config.crashdump.aarch64
  47. build.config.crashdump.x86_64
  48. build.config.db845c
  49. build.config.gki
  50. build.config.gki.aarch64
  51. build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140
  52. build.config.gki.x86_64
  53. build.config.gki_kasan
  54. build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64
  55. build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64
  56. build.config.gki_kprobes
  57. build.config.gki_kprobes.aarch64
  58. build.config.gki_kprobes.x86_64
  59. build.config.khwasan
  60. build.config.kunit.aarch64
  61. build.config.kunit.x86_64
  62. build.config.microdroid
  63. build.config.microdroid.aarch64
  64. build.config.microdroid.x86_64
  65. build.config.rockpi4
  66. build.config.x86_64
  67. COPYING
  68. CREDITS
  69. Kbuild
  70. Kconfig
  71. Kconfig.ext
  72. MAINTAINERS
  73. Makefile
  74. modules.bzl
  75. OWNERS
  76. README
  77. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not a persuasive case.

  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass scripts/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If a patch has been submitted to the community, but rejected, do NOT use the FROMLIST: tag to try to hide this fact. Use the ANDROID: tag as described below as this must be considered as an Android-specific submission, not an upstream submission as the community will not accept these changes as-is.

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)