Closed-Loop Wireless Power Transfer with Adaptive Waveform and Beamforming:
Design, Prototype, and Experiment

We consider a multi-sine multi-antenna WPT system. There are $M$ antennas at the transmitter and one antenna at the receiver. A multi-sine waveform consisting of $N$ tones at angular frequencies $\omega_{1}$, $\omega_{2}$, …, $\omega_{N}$ is transmitted. The multi-sine waveform transmitted by the $m$th transmit antenna is given by

where $s_{m,n}$ is a complex weight accounting for the magnitude and phase of the $n$th tone on the $m$th transmit antenna. We group $s_{m,n}$ into a vector $\mathbf{s}_{n}=\left[s_{1,n},s_{2,n},\ldots,s_{M,n}\right]^{T}$ which characterizes the beamforming at the $n$th tone. Furthermore, we group $\mathbf{s}_{n}$ $\forall n$ into a vector $\mathbf{s}=\left[\mathbf{s}_{1}^{T},\mathbf{s}_{2}^{T},\ldots,\mathbf{s}_{N}^{T}\right]^{T}$ which characterizes the waveform and beamforming. The transmitter is subject to a transmit power constraint given by

where $P$ denotes the transmit power.

The multi-sine waveform transmitted by the multiple transmit antennas propagate through a wireless channel. The waveform received by the receiver can be expressed as

where $\mathbf{h}_{n}=\left[h_{1,n},h_{2,n},...,h_{M,n}\right]$ with $h_{m,n}$ referring to the complex channel gain between the $m$th transmit antenna and the receive antenna at the $n$th angular frequency. Due to the multipath fading channel, the received waveform $y\left(t\right)$ is different from the transmitted waveform $x_{m}\left(t\right)$. Therefore, we need to consider the multipath fading channel when designing the optimal waveform and beamforming for WPT. From (3), the received RF power is given by

The received waveform is input into a rectifier to generate output dc power. The output dc power is denoted as $P_{\mathrm{DC}}$ and given by

where $\eta\left(y\left(t\right)\right)$ refers to the RF-to-dc efficiency with the input waveform $y\left(t\right)$. From (3) and (4), the output dc power is a function of the wireless channel gains $\mathbf{h}_{n}$ $\forall n$ and the waveform and beamforming weight vector $\mathbf{s}$, denoted as $P_{\mathrm{DC}}\left(\mathbf{h}_{1},\mathbf{h}_{2},...,\mathbf{h}_{N},\mathbf{s}\right)$.

Assuming the CSI, i.e. the wireless channel gains $\mathbf{h}_{n}$ $\forall n$, is known at the transmitter, the waveform and beamforming weight vector $\mathbf{s}$ can be optimized to adapt to the channel to maximize the output dc power, which can be formulated as

In the next subsections, we provide two strategies for designing adaptive waveform and beamforming to maximize the output dc power.

Scaled Matched Filter (SMF) is a low complexity strategy to optimize the waveform and beamforming [48]. Using SMF, the beamforming weight vector $\mathbf{s}_{n}$ can be expressed as

where $\beta\geq 1$ is a parameter controlling the magnitude ($l_{2}$-norm) of $\mathbf{s}_{n}$ and $c$ is a constant satisfying the transmit power constraint and is given by

The SMF waveform and beamforming design is only a function of the single parameter $\beta$. We set $\beta=3$ in this work. In [48], it has been shown through simulation that the performance of SMF strategy with $\beta=3$ is close to that of the optimal waveform and beamforming design proposed in [46] but at a much lower computational complexity.

Although the SMF has good performance and low computational complexity, it requires that the transmitter has the knowledge of CSI, i.e. $\mathbf{h}_{n}$ $\forall n$. Acquiring the CSI at the transmitter is challenging in WPT since it needs channel estimation which increases the power consumption and circuit complexity. To overcome this challenge, in the next subsection, we provide another waveform and beamforming design strategy based on limited feedback.

Consider a codebook consisting of $K$ codewords, denoted as $\mathbf{s}^{\left(1\right)}$, $\mathbf{s}^{\left(2\right)}$, …, $\mathbf{s}^{\left(K\right)}$, with each codeword representing a particular waveform and beamforming weight vector. The basic idea of limited feedback strategy is to select the optimal codeword in the codebook to maximize the output dc power. Specifically, the transmitter and receiver cooperatively work frame by frame and the frame period is designed to be smaller than the coherence time of the channel such that the wireless channel gains $\mathbf{h}_{n}$ $\forall n$ are constant during one frame. As shown in Fig. 1, each frame has two phases: training phase and WPT phase. The training phase is to find the optimal codeword, i.e. the optimal waveform and beamforming, while the WPT phase is to transfer the wireless power with the optimal waveform and beamforming. During the training phase, the transmitter sequentially chooses the $K$ codewords as its waveform and beamforming to transfer wireless power while in the meantime the receiver will record the output dc power for each codeword. The output dc power for the $k$th codeword $\mathbf{s}^{\left(k\right)}$ is given by $P_{\mathrm{DC}}\left(\mathbf{h}_{1},\mathbf{h}_{2},...,\mathbf{h}_{N},\mathbf{s}^{\left(k\right)}\right)$. After recording the output dc power for all the codewords, the receiver can find the index of the optimal codeword maximizing the output dc power as

Then, the receiver feeds back the index of the optimal codeword $k^{\star}$ to the transmitter. Since there are $K$ codewords in the codebook, we only need to feed back $\left\lceil\log_{2}K\right\rceil$ bits representing the index of the optimal codeword, where $\left\lceil\cdot\right\rceil$ refers to the ceiling function. Once the transmitter receives the feedback $k^{\star}$, it can use the optimal codeword $\mathbf{s}^{\left(k^{\star}\right)}$ as its waveform and beamforming to efficiently transfer wireless power during the WPT phase.

In contrast with the SMF strategy, the limited feedback strategy can adapt to the wireless channel to increase the output dc power without requiring the knowledge of CSI, i.e. $\mathbf{h}_{n}$ $\forall n$. Due to such benefit, we focus on using the limited feedback strategy to implement our closed-loop WPT system in this work. The key of limited feedback strategy in WPT is the design of an efficient codebook, which should have diverse codewords to match different wireless channel gains. In this work, we design an efficient codebook by following the approach proposed in [49]. Such approach leverages the statistics of the multipath fading channel and the rectifier nonlinearity and simulation results have shown that it can provide high output dc power. In addition, increasing the codebook size $K$ is beneficial to increase the output dc power as there are more codewords to select, however, at the expense of feeding back more bits.

In the next section, we provide a design for the closed-loop WPT system with adaptive waveform and beamforming using limited feedback.

The transmitter consists of two parts. The first part is made up by multiple antennas, power amplifiers, and SDR equipment, which is used to generate and radiate RF signals with waveform and beamforming characterized by different codewords. There are $M$ transmit antennas in the first part and we consider three cases with $M=1$, 2, and 4. All the antennas are identical 2.4-GHz monopole antennas which have omnidirectional radiation patterns with 3 dBi antenna gain and 85% radiation efficiency. Each antenna is connected to a power amplifier, Mini-Circuits ZHL-16W-43-S+, which has a gain of 45 dB and amplifies the RF signal generated by SDR equipment, and the total transmit power is set to 33 dBm (2W). The SDR equipment, National Instrument (NI) USRP-2942, can generate multi-sine waveforms with different magnitudes and phases at each tone. The multi-sine waveform has $N$ tones and we consider four cases with $N=1$, 2, 4, and 8. The $N$ tones are centered around 2.4 GHz with a uniform frequency gap $\Delta_{f}=B/N$ where the bandwidth $B=10$ MHz. We use multiple USRP-2942 to generate multi-sine waveform for each transmit antenna so as to implement the multi-sine waveform and multi-antenna beamforming.

The second part is made up by a 2.4-GHz monopole antenna and a Zolertia RE-Mote, which is used to communicate with the receiver and acquire the optimal codeword fed back from the receiver. The Zolertia RE-Mote is a hardware development platform consisting of the Texas Instruments CC2538 ARM Cortex-M3 system on chip (SoC) and an on-board 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 RF interface. The photo of the Zolertia RE-Mote is shown in Fig. 3. In the Zolertia RE-Mote, we use a Contiki operating system as a software platform. The Zolertia RE-Mote at the transmitter is used to communicate with the receiver, which is also equipped with a Zolertia RE-Mote, through the built-in IEEE 802.15.4 RF interface operating at 2.42 GHz (that is different from the frequency of the multi-sine waveform for WPT). Specifically, the Zolertia RE-Mote at the transmitter sends a message to the receiver to start the program and it also receives the index of the optimal codeword fed back from the receiver, so that the transmitter can transfer the wireless power with the optimal waveform and beamforming to maximize the output dc power.

The receiver consists of two parts as shown in Fig. 3. The first part is a rectenna that receives RF signal and converts it to dc power. It consists of a single diode rectifier and 2.4-GHz monopole antenna with 3 dBi gain and 85% radiation efficiency. We reuse the single diode rectifier design in [53] for simplicity because this work focuses on designing a closed-loop WPT system with adaptive waveform and beamforming instead of focusing on rectifier design. The topology and measured RF-to-dc efficiency of the single diode rectifier are shown in Fig. 4. The rectifier consists of an impedance matching network, a single rectifying diode, a low pass filter, and a load. The Schottky diode Skyworks SMS7630 is chosen as the rectifying diode as it has a low turn-on voltage, which is suitable for low power rectifier. Common materials including the 1.6-mm-thick FR-4 substrate and lumped elements are used to simplify the rectifier fabrication. The values of the elements in the matching network and low pass filter are optimized to maximize RF-to-dc efficiency at low input RF power.

The second part is made up by a 2.4-GHz monopole antenna and a Zolertia RE-Mote, which is used to record the output dc voltage of the rectenna, communicate with the transmitter, and feed back the index of the optimal codeword to the transmitter. The Zolertia RE-Mote at the receiver receives the message from the transmitter to start the program and then it records the output dc voltage of the rectenna through a built-in analog-to-digital converter (ADC). The recorded output dc voltages are processed by the CC2538 ARM Cortex-M3 SoC in the Zolertia RE-Mote and the index of the optimal codeword is found and fed back to the transmitter through the built-in IEEE 802.15.4 RF interface so that the transmitter can transfer the wireless power with the optimal waveform and beamforming.

The flow chart of the adaptive closed-loop WPT system with adaptive waveform and beamforming using limited feedback is shown in Fig. 5. The transmitter and receiver cooperatively work frame by frame. Each frame has two phases: training phase and WPT phase, as shown in Fig. 5. The training phase is to find the optimal codeword, i.e. the optimal waveform and beamforming, while the WPT phase is to transfer the wireless power with the optimal waveform and beamforming.

In the training phase, the Zolertia RE-Mote at the transmitter first sends a message to the receiver through the built-in IEEE 802.15.4 RF interface so that the receiver will start to work. It also sends a message to the NI USRP-2942 through UART so that the NI USRP-2942 will start to work. The NI USRP-2942 sequentially chooses each codeword as its waveform and beamforming to transfer wireless power. The time duration for transferring wireless power for each codeword is $T_{s}=10\>\mathrm{ms}$. In the meantime, the receiver will measure and record the corresponding output dc voltage of the rectenna for each codeword through the built-in ADC in Zolertia RE-Mote. After the Zolertia RE-Mote at the receiver records the output dc voltage for all codewords, it finds the optimal codeword that maximizes the output dc voltage. Generally, for a codebook having $K$ codewords, the receiver only needs to feed back $\left\lceil\log_{2}K\right\rceil$ bits representing the index of the optimal codeword. In this work, we consider codebooks having 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 codewords so that the receiver only needs to feed back 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 bits, respectively, to the transmitter through the IEEE 802.15.4 RF interface. The Zolertia RE-Mote at the transmitter forwards the received feedback to NI USRP-2942 through UART so that the transmitter can choose the optimal codewords as its waveform and beamforming to transfer wireless power. By this way, we can implement the limited feedback closed-loop WPT system where the waveform and beamforming are adaptive to the wireless fading channel to increase the output dc power without requiring the knowledge of CSI. The time duration for the training phase is $KT_{s}$. $T_{s}$ is dependent on the clock and timer setup in NI USRP-2942, which can be modified by programming. To accelerate the training phase, a smaller $T_{s}$ can be set in NI USRP-2942, however, $T_{s}$ cannot be too small since the output dc voltage for a given codeword needs some time to be stable for ADC sampling. If $T_{s}$ is very small, the output dc voltage is not stable and the dc voltage sampled by ADC is not accurate so that the optimal codeword cannot be found.

In the WPT phase, the transmitter transfers the wireless power with the optimal waveform and beamforming. In the meantime, the receiver harvests the wireless power. When the WPT phase is over, it goes to the next frame and the time duration for one frame is set as $T=KT_{s}+T_{p}=2\>\mathrm{s}$ where $T_{p}$ denotes the time duration for the WPT phase. In other words, the proposed closed-loop WPT system periodically adapts to the wireless fading channel to maximize the output dc power.

It is should be noted that the proposed closed-loop WPT system inherently captures the nonlinearity of rectifier since the selection of the codeword is made at the output dc power level (instead of RF power), hence capturing the influence of the input signal on the RF-to-dc efficiency.

First, we show the benefit of closed-loop WPT system with only adaptive beamforming using limited feedback. To that end, we consider the three strategies with only 1 tone and different numbers of transmit antennas, 1, 2, and 4. We use a multimeter to measure the output dc power of the rectifier at locations L1-L15 and average the output dc power over the 15 locations. The average output dc power for the three strategies versus the number of transmit antennas with only 1 tone is shown in Fig. 8. We make the following observations.

1) The average output dc power increases with the number of transmit antennas for the SMF and limited feedback strategies, showing the benefit of multi-antenna adaptive beamforming to increase the output dc power. For the open-loop UP strategies, increasing the number of transmit antenna however reduces the output dc power. It is because the beam of multiple antennas using the UP strategy has fixed direction and narrow beamwidth, which leads to beam misalignment between the transmitter and receiver and reduces the output dc power.

2) The closed-loop SMF and limited feedback strategies achieves higher output dc power than the open-loop strategy UP, showing the benefit of using closed-loop strategies to adapt beamforming to the wireless multipath fading channels.

3) The average output dc power for the limited feedback strategy increases with the number of feedback bits. In other words, using more codewords is beneficial to increase the output dc power. Particularly, when the codebook has enough diverse codewords, the limited feedback strategy can achieve a similar performance to the SMF strategy while having the benefit that it does not require knowing the CSI.

Overall, the measurement results in Fig. 8 show the benefit of closed-loop WPT system with only adaptive beamforming using limited feedback to increase the output dc power.

Next, we show the benefit of closed-loop WPT system with only adaptive waveform using limited feedback. To that end, we consider the three strategies with only 1 transmit antenna and different numbers of tones, 1, 2, 4, and 8. We measure the output dc power at locations L1-L15 and average the output dc power over the 15 locations. The average output dc power for the three strategies versus the number of tones with only 1 transmit antenna is shown in Fig. 9. We make the following observations.

1) The average output dc power increases with the number of tones for the three strategies, showing the benefit of using multi-sine waveform in WPT to increase the output dc power.

2) The closed-loop SMF and limited feedback strategies with more than 3 feedback bits achieves higher output dc power than the open-loop strategy UP, showing the benefit of using closed-loop strategies to adapt waveform to the wireless multipath fading channels.

3) The average output dc power for the limited feedback strategy increases with the number of feedback bits, or the number of codewords, which is same as the adaptive beamforming only case. When the codebook has enough diverse codewords, the limited feedback strategy has a similar performance to the SMF strategy.

Overall, the measurement results in Fig. 9 show the benefit of closed-loop WPT system with only adaptive waveform using limited feedback to increase the output dc power.

Finally, we show the benefit of closed-loop WPT system with joint adaptive waveform and beamforming using limited feedback. To that end, we consider the three strategies with different numbers of transmit antennas, 2, 4, and different numbers of tones, 1, 2, 4, and 8. We measure the output dc power at locations L1-L15 and average the output dc power over the 15 locations. The average output dc power for the three strategies versus the number of tones with different numbers of transmit antennas is shown in Fig. 10. We make the following observations.

1) Comparing the 8-tone cases and 1-tone cases in Fig. 10 (a) and (b), we can find that using the joint adaptive waveform and beamforming achieves higher output dc power than using the adaptive beamforming only.

2) Comparing the 1-transmit-antenna case in Fig. 9 and the 2/4-transmit-antenna cases in Fig. 10, we can find that using the joint adaptive waveform and beamforming achieves higher output dc power than using the adaptive waveform only.

3) The closed-loop SMF and limited feedback strategies with more than 1 feedback bit achieves higher output dc power than the open-loop strategy UP, showing the benefit of using closed-loop strategies.

4) The average output dc power for the limited feedback strategy increases with the number of feedback bits, or the number of codewords. When the codebook has enough diverse codewords, the limited feedback strategy has a similar performance to the SMF strategy.

To further show the benefit of the proposed closed-loop WPT system with adaptive waveform and beamforming, we show the output dc power at different locations for i) the conventional 1-tone 1-antenna WPT system, ii) the proposed 8-tone 4-antenna closed-loop WPT system with feeding back 6 bits, and iii) the benchmark 8-tone 4-antenna closed-loop WPT system using SMF in Fig. 11. Compared with the conventional 1-tone 1-antenna WPT system, using the proposed closed-loop WPT system with adaptive waveform and beamforming can increase the output dc power by 2.2-14.7 dB. In addition, the limited feedback strategy has similar output dc power to the SMF strategy while having the benefit that it does not require knowing the CSI.

Overall, the measurement results in Fig. 10 and Fig. 11 show the benefit of closed-loop WPT system with adaptive waveform and beamforming using limited feedback to increase the output dc power without requiring the knowledge of CSI.