Computer Science and Game Theory
See recent articles
Showing new listings for Friday, 4 September 2026
- [1] arXiv:2609.03122 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Turn-Based Combat Arena: A New Framework for Multiagent Training and Game BalancingComments: 12 pages, 3 figures, 2 tablesSubjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
This paper is the first in a series on Turn-Based Combat Arena, a configurable framework for turn-based strategy games designed to support the efficient training and evaluation of machine learning agents. The proposed framework enables flexible modification of game rules and parameters, allowing rapid experimentation across diverse scenarios. Its architecture is optimized for high-throughput simulation, supporting tens of thousands of games per second and enabling the storage and processing of billions of gameplay records on a single machine. The problem of balancing the game, and particularly the parameters of game units, is investigated in detail. We evaluate several optimization approaches and show that multiple methods converge to comparable solutions, suggesting robustness in identifying balanced game configurations. These results indicate that the framework can serve as a practical platform for both game design analysis and agent training.
- [2] arXiv:2609.03474 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Otter: A Provably MEV-Resilient Automated Market Maker via Surplus RedistributionComments: Abstract shortened to comply with arXiv's character limitSubjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
Miner extractable value (MEV) in automated market makers allows block builders to profit from transaction ordering and injected trades, imposing costs on users and contributing to builder centralization. We introduce Otter (Optimal Truthful Trading with Excess Redistribution), a two-asset batch AMM that achieves provable MEV resilience when the consensus layer provides censorship resilience and block space is uncongested. Otter makes truthful behavior a dominant strategy for both users and builders. Consequently, a builder cannot profit from strategic deviations, including reordering bids or injecting sybil bids, even when the builder is itself a trader with intrinsic value. Moreover, we show that Otter maximizes social welfare, in a strong sense, within a natural class of mechanisms satisfying the desired game-theoretic properties.
To achieve these guarantees, we introduce a new paradigm called surplus redistribution, which provably prevents residual surplus from being captured as MEV by redirecting it to the broader community. Specifically, the pool's output tokens need not be distributed entirely among users in the current batch. Instead, residual surplus may be transferred to a smart contract governed by the decentralized community. The accumulated surplus can be used to benefit community members --- for example, by subsidizing transaction fees, rewarding liquidity providers, or returning assets to the pool.
Our approach relies on the underlying consensus layer to provide censorship resilience. We motivate its necessity through an impossibility result showing that the desired game-theoretic guarantees become unattainable when the builder is additionally allowed to censor transactions. Thus, our results also provide a mathematically formal demonstration of how consensus-level security guarantees can fundamentally expand what is achievable at the application layer. - [3] arXiv:2609.03846 [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: EF1-Constrained Nash Social Welfare with Identical Additive Valuations: Complexity, Guarantees, and ExperimentsSubjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
We study the allocation of indivisible goods among agents with identical additive valuations, focusing on envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Nash social welfare (NSW). Since every maximum-NSW allocation is EF1 under additive valuations, the associated threshold problem inherits the known strong NP-hardness of NSW maximization under identical additive valuations and is strongly NP-complete. We therefore focus on welfare guarantees satisfied by arbitrary EF1 allocations. Although every such allocation is known to achieve an $e^{-1/e}$-approximation to the unrestricted optimal NSW, we identify conditions yielding stronger guarantees. Under uniform valuations, every EF1 allocation is NSW-optimal. Under an $\varepsilon$-small-item condition, every EF1 allocation achieves an explicit approximation ratio $\rho_n(\varepsilon)$ satisfying $\rho_n(\varepsilon) = 1-O(\varepsilon^2)$ as $\varepsilon\to 0$ for fixed $n$.
We further consider the stronger sequential requirement that EF1 be maintained after every item assignment. For this setting, we propose \emph{PriorityNet}, a deep reinforcement learning framework trained using Proximal Policy Optimization and equipped with prospective EF1 action masking. The mask restricts every decision to assignments that preserve EF1, thereby guaranteeing prefix-wise EF1 by construction without post-processing repair. Across 3,000 test instances in each of the offline and random-order online regimes ($n\in[2,20]$ and $m\in[5,100]$), PriorityNet attains mean normalized $\operatorname{NSW}$ values of $0.9911$ and $0.9701$, respectively. Relative to offline Longest Processing Time (LPT) and online least-valued-bundle baselines, it achieves instance-wise win-minus-loss rates of $+27.10\%$ and $+17.87\%$, while matching the offline baseline's mean normalized welfare to four decimal places and modestly improving the online mean from $0.9694$ to $0.9701$.
New submissions (showing 3 of 3 entries)
- [4] arXiv:2609.03096 (cross-list from cs.CR) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: A Bayesian Correlated Equilibrium for Early Insider-Threat DetectionComments: Accepted in GameSec 2026Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
We model insider threat detection as a dynamic Bayesian game in which a platform coordinates a committee of strategic certifiers to sustain equilibrium among honest users and detect malicious deviations before exfiltration. Certifiers and users operate under a Bayesian Temporal Correlated Equilibrium (BTCE), where a sealed-envelope correlating device issues private recommendations over time and obedience is verified at every on-path information state. Unlike Stackelberg formulations, BTCE coordinates heterogeneous certifiers without requiring commitment power. We incorporate present bias and loss aversion to capture impulsive escalation dynamics, enabling 1.7--4.5 days earlier detection than rational baselines. We prove three guarantees: (1) calibrated intervention losses make recommended behavior a current-self best response despite behavioral biases, (2) controlled evidence accumulation guarantees intervention in bounded expected time before exfiltration, and (3) median aggregation confines implemented actions to the honest recommendation range when fewer than half of certifiers are Byzantine. On CERT r6.2 our mechanism achieves up to 28.3% pre-exfiltration detection with false positives below 1.6%, while both a transformer baseline and a streaming provenance approximation (HOLMESLite) achieve near-zero pre-exfiltration detection under comparable constraints.
- [5] arXiv:2609.04059 (cross-list from cs.DS) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Batched Pandora's BoxSubjects: Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
Motivated by numerous parallelizable stochastic search problems, most notable and timely among them being LLM inference-time scaling, we propose and study batched versions of the Pandora's Box problem of Weitzman. In particular, boxes are opened in capacity-constrained batches, each batch has a setup cost, and all rewards in a batch are revealed together. We consider two different variants, motivated by different application environments: one where boxes are reusable (i.e., can provide multiple i.i.d.~samples) and another where they are not. For both variants we rule out most ``simple'' natural heuristics, and also formally prove NP-hardness of approximation in the traditional sense. We then relax the problem to allow bi-criteria approximations, with respect to both rewards and setup costs, where we exhibit constant approximation algorithms for both the reusable and non-reusable settings. This is obtained through a linear-programming relaxation of Pandora's Box problem, followed by randomized or Pipage rounding.
- [6] arXiv:2609.04113 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Constant regret in general games via higher-order optimismComments: 42 pages, 1 figureSubjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
We introduce an uncoupled learning algorithm which, when employed by all players of an arbitrary $N$-player normal form game with up to $K$ actions per player, guarantees $O(N^3\log^2 K)$ individual regret, uniformly over the horizon of play. The proposed algorithm - which we call higher-order optimism with discounting (HOOD) is a variant of optimistic follow-the-regularized-leader (OptFTRL) that combines a discounted $(N+1)$-th order predictor with entropic regularization over a suitable "lifting" of the game's strategy space. This combination of ingredients is purposefully designed to dampen large oscillations of the induced sequence of play in a controlled manner, removing in this way a key stumbling block of previous attempts to achieve constant regret in general games. Our approach bears several striking similarities to the concurrent - and completely independent - work of Liu, Farina, and Ozdaglar (arXiv:2608.31166), who very recently derived an $O(N^{21}\log^{4} K)$ regret bound through the use of higher-order optimism and an exponential moving average estimator.
- [7] arXiv:2609.04189 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Robust PAC Learning of Concurrent Stochastic GamesComments: Main text: 10 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables; Appendix: 22 pages, 2 figures, 1 tableSubjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
We introduce the first Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning framework for general-sum concurrent stochastic games (CSGs) with transition uncertainty, while addressing the challenge of Nash equilibrium (NE) existence. Our algorithm maintains data-driven $L^1$ confidence sets over transition kernels and solves a robust CSG to compute a social-welfare optimal $\varepsilon$-NE, using a robust MDP-based exploration mechanism to drive joint state-action coverage. Crucially, we introduce a Nash margin characterisation that enables principled reasoning about equilibrium existence: the framework either returns an $\varepsilon$-approximate NE whose social-welfare value is $\varepsilon$-close to optimal, or provides a sound certificate that no exact NE exists. Under a minimum reachability condition $p_{\mathrm{reach}}>0$ over relevant state-action pairs, the algorithm terminates after a polynomial number of trajectory samples, with sample complexity $\widetilde{O}\left( {R_{\max}^2 H^4 |S|^2 |A| / (p_{\mathrm{reach}} \varepsilon^2)} \right)$. Empirical results on benchmark CSGs demonstrate near-optimal performance, correct handling of equilibrium (non-)existence, and sample complexity consistent with theory.
Cross submissions (showing 4 of 4 entries)
- [8] arXiv:2310.20096 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Data Market Design through Deep LearningSubjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
The data market design problem is a problem in economic theory to find a set of signaling schemes (statistical experiments) to maximize expected revenue to the information seller, where each experiment reveals some of the information known to a seller and has a corresponding price [Bergemann et al., 2018]. Each buyer has their own decision to make in a world environment, and their subjective expected value for the information associated with a particular experiment comes from the improvement in this decision and depends on their prior and value for different outcomes. In a setting with multiple buyers, a buyer's expected value for an experiment may also depend on the information sold to others [Bonatti et al., 2022]. We introduce the application of deep learning for the design of revenue-optimal data markets, looking to expand the frontiers of what can be understood and achieved. Relative to earlier work on deep learning for auction design [Dütting et al., 2023], we must learn signaling schemes rather than allocation rules and handle obedience constraints $-$ these arising from modeling the downstream actions of buyers $-$ in addition to incentive constraints on bids. Our experiments demonstrate that this new deep learning framework can almost precisely replicate all known solutions from theory, expand to more complex settings, and be used to establish the optimality of new designs for data markets and make conjectures in regard to the structure of optimal designs.
- [9] arXiv:2509.25150 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: The Popular Dimension of MatchingsComments: 15 pagesSubjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Discrete Mathematics (cs.DM); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Combinatorics (math.CO)
We study popular matchings in three classical settings: the house allocation problem, the marriage problem, and the roommates problem. In the popular matching problem, (a subset of) the vertices in a graph have preference orderings over their potential matches. A matching is popular if it gets a plurality of votes in a pairwise election against any other matching. Unfortunately, popular matchings typically do not exist. So we study a natural relaxation, namely popular winning sets which are a set of matchings that collectively get a plurality of votes in a pairwise election against any other matching. The $\textit{popular dimension}$ is the minimum cardinality of a popular winning set, in the worst case over the problem class.
We prove that the popular dimension is exactly $2$ in the house allocation problem, even if the voters are weighted and ties are allowed in their preference lists. For the marriage problem and the roommates problem, we prove that the popular dimension is between $2$ and $3$, when the agents are weighted and/or their preferences orderings allow ties. In the special case where the agents are unweighted and have strict preference orderings, the popular dimension of the marriage problem is known to be exactly $1$ and we prove the popular dimension of the roommates problem is exactly $2$. - [10] arXiv:2607.18634 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Hospitals/Residents with Inseparable Couples: Finding a Coalition-Stable Assignment Is NP-HardComments: Conference version of this paper to appear in SAGT 2026Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
In recent work on course allocation, Rodríguez and Manlove consider the complexity of finding a stable assignment under four notions of stability, including two coalitional notions. In one case, which they call pair-size stability, they show that a stable assignment always exists and they provide a polynomial-time algorithm to find one. In a second case, called pair stability, they observe that an earlier NP-hardness result of McDermid and Manlove holds for a special case of course allocation called Hospitals/Residents with Sizes ($\mbox{HRS}$). In a third case, called first-coalition stability, they use a reduction from $\mbox{HRS}$ to show it is NP-hard to find a stable assignment. They leave open the complexity of finding a stable assignment under so-called coalition stability. Building on ideas from McDermid and Manlove, we resolve the open problem of Rodríguez and Manlove by showing that it is NP-hard to find a coalition-stable assignment for $\mbox{HRS}$. Indeed, our proof shows that the problem remains NP-hard when the hospital capacities and resident sizes are at most two. Accordingly, our NP-hardness result applies to the special case of $\mbox{HRS}$ known as Hospitals/Residents with Inseparable Couples ($\mbox{HRIC}$). Finally, we introduce a novel and natural notion of coalitional stability for both $\mbox{HRS}$ and course allocation, and we show that our NP-hardness result extends to this notion, which we call unitwise-coalition stability.
- [11] arXiv:2605.12462 (replaced) [pdf, html, other]
-
Title: Towards Affordable Energy: A Gymnasium Environment for Electric Utility Demand-Response ProgramsSubjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Extreme weather and volatile wholesale electricity markets expose residential consumers to catastrophic financial risks, yet demand response at the distribution level remains an underutilized tool for grid flexibility and energy affordability. While a demand-response program can shield consumers by issuing financial credits during high-price periods, optimizing this sequential decision-making process presents a unique challenge for reinforcement learning despite the plentiful offline historical smart meter and wholesale pricing data available publicly. Offline historical data fails to capture the dynamic, interactive feedback loop between an electric utility's pricing signals and customer acceptance and adaptation to a demand-response program. To address this, we introduce DR-Gym, an open-source, online Gymnasium-compatible environment designed to train and evaluate demand-response from the electric utility's perspective. Unlike existing device-level energy simulators, our environment focuses on the market-level electric utility setting and provides a rich observational space relevant to the electric utility. The simulator additionally features a regime-switching wholesale price model calibrated to real-world extreme events, alongside physics-based building demand profiles. For our learning signal, we use a configurable, multi-objective reward function for specifying diverse learning objectives. We demonstrate through baseline strategies and data snapshots the capability of our simulator to create realistic and learnable environments.