抽空写了个曲线均分测试,把任意曲线平成分成长度相等的N段。仅此记录, 下面测试了三种,前2种是测试方案:
第一种是通过参数进行分割:分别获得曲线的 FirstParameter 和 LastParameter ,然后对参数进行分割,获得n个ui,并对每个ui调用D0(获得这个点的坐标值)或D1(获得这个点的坐标值和切向量)。这个方法的优点是,简单易行,好操作,缺点均分参数轴获得的曲线的分割并不是均匀的,在OSG中显示如下:


测试代码如下:
////////////////////////////////////////////////////参数对曲线分割方法///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
TColgp_Array1OfPnt Points1(1, 4);
Points1.SetValue(1, gp_Pnt(2, 0, 0));
Points1.SetValue(2, gp_Pnt(4, 0, 0));
Points1.SetValue(3, gp_Pnt(5, 6, 0));
Points1.SetValue(4, gp_Pnt(6, 3, 0));
GeomAPI_PointsToBSpline PTBS1(Points1);
Handle(Geom_BSplineCurve) curve = PTBS1.Curve();
Standard_Integer splitN = 10;
Standard_Real firstParam = curve->FirstParameter();
Standard_Real lastParam = curve->LastParameter();
//
TopoDS_Edge anEdge = BRepBuilderAPI_MakeEdge(curve).Edge();
Handle(AIS_Shape) red = new AIS_Shape(anEdge);
TopoDS_Shape Sh1 = red->Shape();
buildCurve(Sh1); //显示曲线
//
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec3Array> vertices = new osg::Vec3Array();
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geometry> keyPointGeom = new osg::Geometry();
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec4Array> colors = new osg::Vec4Array;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geode> geode = new osg::Geode();
//
for (Standard_Integer i = 0; i<splitN + 1; ++i)
{
Standard_Real ui = (i * (lastParam - firstParam) / splitN);
ui = firstParam + ui;
gp_Pnt pi;
gp_Vec veci;
curve->D1(ui, pi, veci);
vertices->push_back(osg::Vec3(pi.X(), pi.Y(), pi.Z()));
colors->push_back(osg::Vec4(1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0));
}
if (vertices->size() > 0)
{
keyPointGeom->setVertexArray(vertices.get());
keyPointGeom->addPrimitiveSet(new osg::DrawArrays(osg::PrimitiveSet::POINTS, 0, vertices->size()));
keyPointGeom->setColorArray(colors, osg::Array::BIND_OVERALL);
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Point> pointSize = new osg::Point;
pointSize->setSize(7.5);
keyPointGeom->getOrCreateStateSet()->setAttribute(pointSize);
keyPointGeom->getOrCreateStateSet()->setMode(GL_LIGHTING, osg::StateAttribute::OFF | osg::StateAttribute::PROTECTED);
geode->addDrawable(keyPointGeom);
m_osgViewer->getRoot()->addChild(geode);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
第二种是直接对曲线分割:通过类 GCPnts_UniformAbscissa 实现对一个Geom_Curve对象的平均分割,获得分割点的坐标及对应的参数,在OSG中显示如下:


测试代码如下:
////////////////////////////////////////////////////直接对曲线分割方法///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
TColgp_Array1OfPnt Points1(1, 4);
Points1.SetValue(1, gp_Pnt(2, 0, 0));
Points1.SetValue(2, gp_Pnt(4, 0, 0));
Points1.SetValue(3, gp_Pnt(5, 6, 0));
Points1.SetValue(4, gp_Pnt(6, 3, 0));
GeomAPI_PointsToBSpline PTBS1(Points1);
Handle(Geom_BSplineCurve) curve = PTBS1.Curve();
Standard_Integer splitN = 10;
GeomAdaptor_Curve GAC(curve);
GCPnts_UniformAbscissa UA(GAC, splitN + 1);
Standard_Real* params = new Standard_Real[splitN + 1];
//显示曲线
TopoDS_Edge anEdge = BRepBuilderAPI_MakeEdge(curve).Edge();
Handle(AIS_Shape) red = new AIS_Shape(anEdge);
TopoDS_Shape Sh1 = red->Shape();
buildCurve(Sh1);
//osg
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec3Array> vertices = new osg::Vec3Array();
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geometry> keyPointGeom = new osg::Geometry();
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Vec4Array> colors = new osg::Vec4Array;
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Geode> geode = new osg::Geode();
//
if (UA.IsDone())
{
Standard_Real n = UA.NbPoints();
Standard_Integer index = 0;
for (; index<n + 1; ++index)
{
Standard_Real parami = UA.Parameter(index + 1);
params[index] = parami;
gp_Pnt tpnt;
curve->D0(parami, tpnt);
vertices->push_back(osg::Vec3(tpnt.X(), tpnt.Y(), tpnt.Z()));
colors->push_back(osg::Vec4(1.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1.0));
}
}
if (vertices->size() > 0)
{
keyPointGeom->setVertexArray(vertices.get());
keyPointGeom->addPrimitiveSet(new osg::DrawArrays(osg::PrimitiveSet::POINTS, 0, vertices->size()));
keyPointGeom->setColorArray(colors, osg::Array::BIND_OVERALL);
osg::ref_ptr<osg::Point> pointSize = new osg::Point;
pointSize->setSize(7.5);
keyPointGeom->getOrCreateStateSet()->setAttribute(pointSize);
keyPointGeom->getOrCreateStateSet()->setMode(GL_LIGHTING, osg::StateAttribute::OFF | osg::StateAttribute::PROTECTED);
geode->addDrawable(keyPointGeom);
m_osgViewer->getRoot()->addChild(geode);
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
最后,测试下Topds_edge ,绘制一个椭圆测试,第二种方案均分效果如下:

总结:使用直接对曲线分割方法能获得更好的效果。 如有错误,请联系我修改,谢谢! qq:1623451686

4673

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



