作者:
Nomy Arpaly 出版社: Oxford University Press, USA 副标题: An Inquiry Into Moral Agency 出版年: 2004-12-30 页数: 208 定价: USD 25.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780195179767
Nomy Arpaly rejects the model of rationality used by most ethicists and action theorists. Both observation and psychology indicate that people act rationally without deliberation, and act irrationally with deliberation. By questioning the notion that our own minds are comprehensible to us-and therefore questioning much of the current work of action theorists and ethicists-Arpal...
Nomy Arpaly rejects the model of rationality used by most ethicists and action theorists. Both observation and psychology indicate that people act rationally without deliberation, and act irrationally with deliberation. By questioning the notion that our own minds are comprehensible to us-and therefore questioning much of the current work of action theorists and ethicists-Arpaly attempts to develop a more realistic conception of moral agency.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Nomy Arpaly is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Rice University.
目录
· · · · · ·
1 The Complexity of Moral Psychology 3
2 On Acting Rationally against One's Best Judgment 33
3 Moral Worth 67
4 Varieties of Autonomy 117
5 Blame, Autonomy, and Problem Cases 149
Notes 181
· · · · · ·
(更多)
1 The Complexity of Moral Psychology 3
2 On Acting Rationally against One's Best Judgment 33
3 Moral Worth 67
4 Varieties of Autonomy 117
5 Blame, Autonomy, and Problem Cases 149
Notes 181
References 191
Index 197
· · · · · · (收起)
While these tales show serious Problems for the traditional notion of a character trait, they do not show that there is no fact of the matter about moral concern. The Person who loves more is not always the person who says I love you more often, but some People do love more than others.The person who is more devoted to her students is not always the person
who comes to class more often, but some people are devoted to their students more than others. And the connection between depth of concern and moral worth is an important truth aimed at by talk of character. (p. 98)
(查看原文)
Characters in Holywood movies encounter a lot of car chases. Characters in novels rarely wash their hands or do their laundry. And in the work of moral psychologists, People deliberate and reflect a lot. (p. 20) (查看原文)
为了让我们的讨论得以顺利进行，在开始之前我会做一些简要的说明。 首先，在Arplay所代表的概念空间中，理性的定义就是terms of desire satisfaction given one's beliefs（P50）；我不会去反驳她的定义，这没有意义。 其次，让我们剔除那些与行动理论（尤其是行动意志薄弱）无...
(展开)
Castor
1 有用 我爱大菠萝蜜 2023-08-17 21:55:24 美国
人是软弱的，akrasia也可以是理性的，unconscious action也是action，只要action可以manifest行动者的will，那么就有blameworthiness。 不过在看第二章讲akrasia也可以是rational的时候Arpaly给出的理由是从第三人称视角来看akrasia的行为说不定可以更好地与行动者的整体信念欲望等等相融贯，这就说明它是rational的。似乎... 人是软弱的，akrasia也可以是理性的，unconscious action也是action，只要action可以manifest行动者的will，那么就有blameworthiness。 不过在看第二章讲akrasia也可以是rational的时候Arpaly给出的理由是从第三人称视角来看akrasia的行为说不定可以更好地与行动者的整体信念欲望等等相融贯，这就说明它是rational的。似乎这会蕴含一种inverse self-other asymmetry，别人比我更了解自己，并且当我们有某种历史的时候，似乎就注定了做出一些与这种历史相悖的决策永远是不理性的（e.g., 萨特的赌徒做出想要戒赌的决定），Arpaly这里的观点看起来就不太让我赞同，这或许也是她没有引Moran的原因hh (展开)
1 有用 爱与痛的边缘 2025-10-22 21:31:52 浙江
激动人心又简洁明快，Arpaly在构造案例和调动哲学直觉上功力惊人。当然我觉得Arpaly对控制理论的反驳并不是绝对的——考虑到控制理论和他主张的意志理论都是某种版本的相容论策略，我怀疑这两种策略仅仅是在解释力上有区别。Arpaly会说意志理论在解释道德价值以及道德责任的问题上有突出的优势，它突出了人的认知状态或者意志状态对归属道德责任的影响作用，但这并不是说控制理论不能做到这些。支持控制理论的人... 激动人心又简洁明快，Arpaly在构造案例和调动哲学直觉上功力惊人。当然我觉得Arpaly对控制理论的反驳并不是绝对的——考虑到控制理论和他主张的意志理论都是某种版本的相容论策略，我怀疑这两种策略仅仅是在解释力上有区别。Arpaly会说意志理论在解释道德价值以及道德责任的问题上有突出的优势，它突出了人的认知状态或者意志状态对归属道德责任的影响作用，但这并不是说控制理论不能做到这些。支持控制理论的人或许很大程度上拒绝共享Arpaly对某些案例的直觉——而且正如Arpaly自己所暗示的，如果控制（agent-autonomy）是一种程度概念的话，那我认为控制理论或许和意志理论的差别并没有想象中的那么大。 (展开)
0 有用 Furuhonya 2025-03-31 16:11:27 广东
Arpaly就是哲学妈妈的理想形态…
0 有用 蒯因的兔子🐰 2024-02-18 18:22:01 加拿大
「We are neither captain nor slave of our souls. We ARE our souls.」感觉还是这本最能代表Arpaly（（所以为什么先翻译了后来那本desire啊
0 有用 Agilulfo 2024-02-18 18:48:19 上海
补标。