This work is Strauss' reading of Xenophon's dialogue, "Hiero" or "Tyrannicus", in which the tyrant Hiero and the poet Simonides discuss the advantages and disadvantages of exercising tyranny. This edition includes a translation of the dialogue, a critique of the commentary by the French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve, Strauss' restatement of his position in light of Kojeve's comm...
This work is Strauss' reading of Xenophon's dialogue, "Hiero" or "Tyrannicus", in which the tyrant Hiero and the poet Simonides discuss the advantages and disadvantages of exercising tyranny. This edition includes a translation of the dialogue, a critique of the commentary by the French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve, Strauss' restatement of his position in light of Kojeve's comments, and the complete Strauss-Kojeve correspondence.
Leo Strauss (1899-1973) was the Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Chicago. His many contributions to political philosophy include The Political Philosophy of Hobbes and Liberalism Ancient and Modern, both published by the University of Chicago Press.
只读了Hiero和文本解读，后面有和科耶夫的通信辩论，没有看。敏锐地抓住了《君主论》第六章里对Hiero的称赞，认为这篇对话也是哲人对僭主的充满隐微的教导，从beneficent tyranny过渡到private life vs political/communal life，或者wisdom vs common recognition，进而过渡到virtue vs pleasure，二者冲突通...只读了Hiero和文本解读，后面有和科耶夫的通信辩论，没有看。敏锐地抓住了《君主论》第六章里对Hiero的称赞，认为这篇对话也是哲人对僭主的充满隐微的教导，从beneficent tyranny过渡到private life vs political/communal life，或者wisdom vs common recognition，进而过渡到virtue vs pleasure，二者冲突通过awareness of self-progress towards wisdom解决。第一次读controversial的施特劳斯，提出的问题很根本、也的确是现代社会忽视的，引人思考，但作者立场也没有彻底说服我。文本读得很细，特别值得学习。导读提到和科耶夫的争论在于哲人是远离还是改造共同体。(展开)
In his work On Tyranny, Leo Strauss close reads (between the lines) of Xenophon’s Hiero to suggest a divide between the philosophical and the political. Hiero, the tyrant, is provoked by Simonides, the wise man in this conversation on tyranny. At the same ...
(展开)
![[法国] 亚历山大·科耶夫](https://img9.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/sRUZPgdNRpgcel_avatar_uploaded1503149495.05.jpg)
亚历山大·科耶夫 作者
danyboy
华夏出版社2006版
哲夫成城
华夏出版社2016版
若水
北竹君
华夏出版社2016版
汪杨
华夏出版社2006版
5 有用 乱眉先生 2014-07-08 19:48:10
这本书让我知道陷入思想黑洞的可怕与享受
1 有用 丁白 2022-11-26 17:07:12 安徽
高中时读的，补标。哲人对僭主的态度反映出知识与共同体伦理的关系…
0 有用 sillykoala 2011-02-27 03:07:53
Brilliant interpretation.
0 有用 大清国的猫托邦 2015-10-20 14:12:17
@2015-10-20 14:12:17
0 有用 差点没头的女巫 2019-01-25 01:31:38
只读了Hiero和文本解读，后面有和科耶夫的通信辩论，没有看。敏锐地抓住了《君主论》第六章里对Hiero的称赞，认为这篇对话也是哲人对僭主的充满隐微的教导，从beneficent tyranny过渡到private life vs political/communal life，或者wisdom vs common recognition，进而过渡到virtue vs pleasure，二者冲突通... 只读了Hiero和文本解读，后面有和科耶夫的通信辩论，没有看。敏锐地抓住了《君主论》第六章里对Hiero的称赞，认为这篇对话也是哲人对僭主的充满隐微的教导，从beneficent tyranny过渡到private life vs political/communal life，或者wisdom vs common recognition，进而过渡到virtue vs pleasure，二者冲突通过awareness of self-progress towards wisdom解决。第一次读controversial的施特劳斯，提出的问题很根本、也的确是现代社会忽视的，引人思考，但作者立场也没有彻底说服我。文本读得很细，特别值得学习。导读提到和科耶夫的争论在于哲人是远离还是改造共同体。 (展开)