Originally published in 1893 and never out of print, Emile Durkheim's groundbreaking work remains one of the cornerstone texts of the sociological canon--now updated and re-translated in this new edition. As the Industrial Revolution was changing the landscape of society, Durkheim presented a new vision of the social structures at the root of capitalism, and the issues he grapp...
Originally published in 1893 and never out of print, Emile Durkheim's groundbreaking work remains one of the cornerstone texts of the sociological canon--now updated and re-translated in this new edition. As the Industrial Revolution was changing the landscape of society, Durkheim presented a new vision of the social structures at the root of capitalism, and the issues he grappled with still resound today. If pre-industrial societies were held together by common values, sentiments, and norms, equally shared by all, what holds modern societies, with their complex division of labor and non-cohesive social structure, together? What did this new social order mean for the autonomy of the individual? Durkheim argued that class conflict is not inherent in a capitalist society, as Marx contended, but that the unfettered growth of state power would lead to the extinction of individuality. Only in a free society that promotes voluntary bonds between its members, Durkheim suggested, can individuality prosper. In this new edition, the first since 1984, world-renowned Durkheim scholar Steven Lukes revisits and revises the original translation to enhance clarity, accuracy, and fluency for the contemporary reader. Lukes also highlights Durkheim's arguments by putting them into historical context with a timeline of important information. For students and scholars, this edition of "The Division of Labor" is essential reading and key to understanding the relevance of Durkheim's ideas today.
Mechanical solidarity (repressive law) -> Organic Solidarity (restitutive law; make yourself usefully fulfill a determinate function; holistic theory) -> Anomie in modern society (the peril in all soc...Mechanical solidarity (repressive law) -> Organic Solidarity (restitutive law; make yourself usefully fulfill a determinate function; holistic theory) -> Anomie in modern society (the peril in all social functions) -> Our first duty is to make a moral code for ourselves. 涂尔干真正的拯救社会的野心终于在结尾暴露无遗（建立社会纽带、共同道德、限制越轨行为），太伟大了。 Chris(展开)
这本书很难读，中间断断续续停了很长时间才勉强读完，对几个关键概念做一下梳理。 韦伯关注“struggle of power"，马克思关注"economic conflict "，这两位都是从分析矛盾从发，尝试解释什么破坏了社会。而涂尔干与他们相反，他从分析团结出发，他的问题是“what bring us tog...
(展开)
Foundations of modern social theory的final，纪念某个清晨，一个睡眼朦胧的女孩被涂尔干的思想醍醐灌顶而清醒无比的感觉。 —————— As two of the three greatest sociologists in the 20th century, Durkheim and Marx have different interpretations of division of ...
(展开)
![[法国] 埃米尔·涂尔干](https://img3.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1502929871.3.jpg)
冒雨先生
生活·读书·新知三联书店2013版
等人来抬你？
生活·读书·新知三联书店2000版
botVeritas
生活·读书·新知三联书店2000版
chen
生活·读书·新知三联书店2013版
齐东强
生活·读书·新知三联书店2000版
1 有用 felsina 2025-01-06 02:48:06 意大利
很有帮助，读一百年前的著作主要是看经典学者如何思考社会问题。个人愿意认为涂尔干系统性的试图构建不同于马克思主义劳动异化理论的解释框架，最终的结果是涂尔干给出了劳动分工应然层面对应的社会理想状态，而马克思、女性主义等提供的是对现代社会劳动分工实然层面种种问题的现实批判。关于契约、法律、惩戒和社群联结的讨论既与当代社会多有呼应，也明显可以看到对福柯的影响。
0 有用 Alexayi 2014-03-25 08:00:53
Durkheim paradox
2 有用 秋江暝泊 2012-10-10 22:05:50
涂尔干真是一个温情脉脉的拯救者，从现代中拯救社会。从这点上来说，他是和马克思、韦伯站在同一个高度上对话的。
0 有用 Annieangel 2012-10-28 12:26:33
真是虽然第一部分看起来很快的样子，读进去才发现holistic theory都那么费神。再加上Radcliffe-Brown的那篇超精华版对structural-functionalism的intro已经完全看虚掉了><
0 有用 Soo Yung 2018-11-09 11:05:14
Mechanical solidarity (repressive law) -> Organic Solidarity (restitutive law; make yourself usefully fulfill a determinate function; holistic theory) -> Anomie in modern society (the peril in all soc... Mechanical solidarity (repressive law) -> Organic Solidarity (restitutive law; make yourself usefully fulfill a determinate function; holistic theory) -> Anomie in modern society (the peril in all social functions) -> Our first duty is to make a moral code for ourselves. 涂尔干真正的拯救社会的野心终于在结尾暴露无遗（建立社会纽带、共同道德、限制越轨行为），太伟大了。 Chris (展开)