…Governmental intervention into education can be rationalized on two grounds. The first is the existence of substantial “neighborhood effects,”… (查看原文)
A stable and democratic society is impossible without a minimum degree of literacy and knowledge on the part of most citizens and without widespread acceptance of some common set of values. Education can contribute to both. In consequence, the gain from the education of a child accrues not only to the child or to his parents but also to other members of the society. The education of my child contributes to your welfare by promoting a stable and democratic society. It is not feasible to identify the particular individuals (or families) benefited and so to charge for the services rendered. There is therefore a significant “neighborhood effect.” (查看原文)
2 有用 LipingTaBaBa 2007-02-22 04:45:54
翻译得狗屎不通
1 有用 约翰格利特 2012-12-21 22:01:05
认为平权反自由的观点深感同意。绪论很好:自由人不问他的国家能为他做些什么,也不问他为他的国家做些什么。他会问的是“我和我的同胞们能通过政府做些什么。”技术垄断和保险制度保留意见。翻译不行。
14 有用 巳注销 2008-10-09 14:14:41
5星完全是冲原著,翻译烂到家还有严重删节
1 有用 houxue 2008-11-28 23:18:20
读了两章,硬是读不下去。商务印书馆出了名的糟蹋名著。
0 有用 Sunday 2012-08-04 15:40:53
出現在豆瓣首頁,還以為又有好書再版,原來還是舊版