作者:
James C. Scott 出版社: Yale University Press 副标题: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance 出版年: 1987-9-10 页数: 392 定价: USD 24.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780300036411
Weapons of the Weak is an ethnography by James C. Scott that studies the effects of the Green Revolution in rural Malaysia. One of the main objectives of the study is to make an argument that the Marxian and Gramscian ideas of false consciousness and hegemony are incorrect. He develops this conclusion throughout the book, through the different scenarios and characters that come...
Weapons of the Weak is an ethnography by James C. Scott that studies the effects of the Green Revolution in rural Malaysia. One of the main objectives of the study is to make an argument that the Marxian and Gramscian ideas of false consciousness and hegemony are incorrect. He develops this conclusion throughout the book, through the different scenarios and characters that come up during his time of fieldwork in the village. This publication, based on 2 years of fieldwork (1978-1980), focuses on the local class relations in a small rice farming community of 70 households in the main paddy-growing area of Kedah in Malaysia. Introduction of the Green Revolution in 1976 eliminated 2/3 of the wage-earning opportunities for smallholders and landless laborers. The main ensuing class struggle is analyzed being the ideological struggle in the village and the practice of resistance itself consisting of: foot-dragging, dissimulation, desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance and sabotage acts. Rich and poor are engaged in an unremitting if silent struggle to define changes in land tenure, mechanization and employment to advance their own interests, and to use values that they share to control the distribution of status, land, work and grain.
James C. Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrariane, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seei Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Cong Like a State: How...
James C. Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrariane, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seei Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Cong Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistancendition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Be: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia.ing Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia." He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Science" He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper. s and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper.
0 有用 グルママ 2016-02-06 00:07:54
沉着等待,微权利的一种乡野观察。
0 有用 Lucien在昂古莱 2024-03-02 01:26:22 美国
more nuanced than people credit it to be but the analysis is lacking
1 有用 nightdreamer 2015-04-19 19:29:50
画风马上就变了。应该算是采用民族志法研究抗争的早期学者。
0 有用 Le Flaneur 2025-02-10 21:06:43 江苏
标题很吸引人,但结合实际内容来看有点标题党了,我以为整本书都会讲贫农是如何通过日常的不合作行为来抵抗剥削的,但这只是前面的一小部分,整本书主要还是在讲作者在这个马来西亚村庄观察到的劳动与阶级分化现象;写得有点散,充满了作者观察记录的小故事,但作者的人类学洞察力太强了,对日常生活的批判与分析非常精辟,而且还是从我感兴趣的劳工与阶级角度出发,让人读得停不下来,即使是枯燥的理论部分也能坚持得下去
5 有用 秋江暝泊 2013-11-04 05:40:45
四星半。完全是一个在葛兰西/马克思框架下阶级结构和文化霸权的传统下的东西,生产关系变化历史变迁中意识形态/霸权和社会运动之间的dynamics。这是发展研究课上的阅读,但我读下来感觉这个ethnography更像是在跟比较历史和宏大理论对话:怎样用一地的经验映照到更为宏阔的理论,怎样理解现代化,或者确切的说农业技术的引进带来的阶级结构的变化,两个阶级的两种历史叙述、文化构建、话语认知在更新和重构,... 四星半。完全是一个在葛兰西/马克思框架下阶级结构和文化霸权的传统下的东西,生产关系变化历史变迁中意识形态/霸权和社会运动之间的dynamics。这是发展研究课上的阅读,但我读下来感觉这个ethnography更像是在跟比较历史和宏大理论对话:怎样用一地的经验映照到更为宏阔的理论,怎样理解现代化,或者确切的说农业技术的引进带来的阶级结构的变化,两个阶级的两种历史叙述、文化构建、话语认知在更新和重构,所谓的日常抗争概念,更不如说是作者重构的理论中,subordinate class的阶级文化,意识形态与行动之间的关系之后才申发表征出来的一个说法。核心论述绝对不在看上去像是的第二章啊,而是在从第五章一直到第六章第七章意思顺延下来的第八章,对霸权理论的批判和重构。 (展开)