With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. But if we were to let go of this fond conviction, Bruno Latour asks, what would the world look like? His book, an anthropology of science, shows us how much of modernity is actually a matter of faith. What does it mean to be modern? What d...
With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. But if we were to let go of this fond conviction, Bruno Latour asks, what would the world look like? His book, an anthropology of science, shows us how much of modernity is actually a matter of faith. What does it mean to be modern? What difference does the scientific method make? The difference, Latour explains, is in our careful distinctions between nature and society, between human and thing, distinctions that our benighted ancestors, in their world of alchemy, astrology, and phrenology, never made. But alongside this purifying practice that defines modernity, there exists another seemingly contrary one: the construction of systems that mix politics, science, technology, and nature. The ozone debate is such a hybrid, in Latour's analysis, as are global warming, deforestation, even the idea of black holes. As these hybrids proliferate, the prospect of keeping nature and culture in their separate mental chambers becomes overwhelming--and rather than try, Latour suggests, we should rethink our distinctions, rethink the definition and constitution of modernity itself. His book offers a new explanation of science that finally recognizes the connections between nature and culture--and so, between our culture and others, past and present. Nothing short of a reworking of our mental landscape. "We Have Never Been Modern" blurs the boundaries among science, the humanities, and the social sciences to enhance understanding on all sides. A summation of the work of one of the most influential and provocative interpreters of science, it aims at saving what is good and valuable in modernity and replacing the rest with a broader, fairer, and finer sense of possibility.
Bruno Latour is Professor Emeritus at Sciences Po Paris. He is the 2021 Kyoto Prize Laureate in Arts and Philosophy and was awarded the 2013 Holberg International Memorial Prize.
目录
· · · · · ·
Acknowledgements
1. Crisis
1.1 The Proliferation of Hybrids
1.2 Retying the Gordian Knot
1.3 The Crisis of the Critical Stance
1.4 1989: The Year of Miracles
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Acknowledgements
1. Crisis
1.1 The Proliferation of Hybrids
1.2 Retying the Gordian Knot
1.3 The Crisis of the Critical Stance
1.4 1989: The Year of Miracles
1.5 What Does It Mean To Be A Modern?
2. Constitution
2.1 The Modern Constitution
2.2 Boyle and His Objects
2.3 Hobbes and His Subjects
2.4 The Mediation of the Laboratory
2.5 The Testimony of Nonhumans
2.6 The Double Artifact of the Laboratory and the Leviathan
2.7 Scientific Representation and Political Representation
2.8 The Constitutional Guarantees of the Modern
2.9 The Fourth Guarantee: The Crossed-out God
2.10 The Power of the Modern Critique
2.11 The Invincibility of the Moderns
2.12 What the Constitution Clarifies and What It Obscures
2.13 The End of Denunciation
2.14 We Have Never Been Modern
3. Revolution
3.1 The Moderns, Victims of Their Own Success
3.2 What Is a Quasi-Object?
3.3 Philosophies Stretched Over the Yawning Gap
3.4 The End of Ends
3.5 Semiotic Turns
3.6 Who Has Forgotten Being?
3.7 The Beginning of the Past
3.8 The Revolutionary Miracle
3.9 The End of the Passing Past
3.10 Triage and Multiple Times
3.11 A Copernican Counter-revolution
3.12 From Intermediaries to Mediators
3.13 Accusation, Causation
3.14 Variable Ontologies
3.15 Connecting the Four Modern Repertoires
4. Relativism
4.1 How to End the Asymmetry
4.2 The Principle of Symmetry Generalized
4.3 The Import-Export System of the Two Great Divides
4.4 Anthropology Comes Home from the Tropics
4.5 There Are No Cultures
4.6 Sizeable Differences
4.7 Archimedes’ coup d’état
4.8 Absolute Relativisim and Relativist Relativism
4.9 Small Mistakes Concerning the Disenchantment of the World
4.10 Even a Longer Network Remains Local at All Points
4.11 The Leviathan is a Skein of Networks
4.12 A Perverse Taste for the Margins
4.13 Avoid Adding New Crimes to Old
4.14 Transcendences Abound
5. Redistribution
5.1 The Impossible Modernization
5.2 Final Examinations
5.3 Humanism Redistributed
5.4 The Nonmodern Constitution
5.5 The Parliament of Things
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
非常insightful,但挺多地方不太认同,也或许是没有理解,嗯,很大的可能是我没有理解,作为一个历史学生我对sts确实理解太浅,but anyway this does offer an alternative understanding of modernity。不过latour基本上还是在define modernity in terms of science and technology...非常insightful,但挺多地方不太认同,也或许是没有理解,嗯,很大的可能是我没有理解,作为一个历史学生我对sts确实理解太浅,but anyway this does offer an alternative understanding of modernity。不过latour基本上还是在define modernity in terms of science and technology, which is inevitably Eurocentric.(展开)
Is Bruno Latour a human being, or is he a God? That’s the question I ask as I flip through the pages of We Have Never Been Modern. Latour seems like a God because the network he describes does not seem to exclude anything. It is similar to a monad, simulta...
(展开)
As a highly acclaimed philosopher and sociologist, Bruno Latour is renowned for his ideas on the concept of modernity. In his book "We Have Never Been Modern," he boldly declares that despite the many advancements in technology and science, we have never tr...
(展开)
0 有用 Master Faust 2010-09-18 16:25:58
完全看不懂
0 有用 昆玉河边扒猪脸 2010-04-24 03:30:08
近年看的最好的书之一
0 有用 einZebra 2013-01-11 10:31:06
Isn't Latour just adorable!
21 有用 tifanie 2014-10-07 23:32:16
读得想哭,真想跪在各位哲学大神面前,求求他们能不能用一句话说明白而不要写一本书。
1 有用 curatingtears 2022-02-05 20:31:22
非常insightful,但挺多地方不太认同,也或许是没有理解,嗯,很大的可能是我没有理解,作为一个历史学生我对sts确实理解太浅,but anyway this does offer an alternative understanding of modernity。不过latour基本上还是在define modernity in terms of science and technology... 非常insightful,但挺多地方不太认同,也或许是没有理解,嗯,很大的可能是我没有理解,作为一个历史学生我对sts确实理解太浅,but anyway this does offer an alternative understanding of modernity。不过latour基本上还是在define modernity in terms of science and technology, which is inevitably Eurocentric. (展开)