The evil genius proves to be even more clever than the cogito. As for Nietzsche's own philosophy, cither it exempts itself from the universal reign of Verstellung (but through what higher ruse could it escape the sophism of the liar?), or else it succumbs to it (but then how can one justify the tone of revelation with which the will to power, the overman, and the eternal return of the same are proclaimed?). This dilemma, which does not seem to have kept Nietzsche from thinking and writing, has become that of his commentators, split into two camps: the faithful and the ironists. [20]
[20]: French commentators line up generally in the second camp, accompanied by Paul de Man in his essay "Rhetoric of Tropes," in Allegories of Reading (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), pp. 103-18. (查看原文)
La question sera pour nous de savoir si, comme Hume, Parfit n'a pas cherché ce qu'il ne pouvait trouver, à savoir un statut ferme de l'identité personnelle définie en termes de mêmeté (查看原文)
![[法国] 保罗·利科](https://img1.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1525328468.9.jpg)
保罗·利科 作者
哲夫成城
商务印书馆2013版
还没人写过短评呢