A landmark, magisterial history of the trial of Japan’s leaders as war criminals—the largely overlooked Asian counterpart to Nuremberg
In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies to end World War II, the world turned to the question of how to move on from years of carnage and destruction. For Harry Truman, Douglas MacArthur, Chiang Kai-shek, and their fellow victors, the question of justice seemed clear: Japan’s militaristic leaders needed to be tried and punished for the surprise attack at Pearl Harbor; shocking atrocities against civilians in China, the Philippines, and elsewhere; and rampant abuses of prisoners of war in notorious incidents such as the Bataan death march. For the Allied powers, the trial was an opportunity to render judgment on their vanquished foes, but also to create a legal framework to prosecute war crimes and prohibit the use of aggressive war, building a more peaceful world under international law and American hegemony. For the Japanese leaders on trial, it was their chance to argue that their war had been waged to liberate Asia from Western imperialism and that the court was victors’ justice.
For more than two years, lawyers for both sides presented their cases before a panel of clashing judges from China, India, the Philippines, and Australia, as well as the United States and European powers. The testimony ran from horrific accounts of brutality and the secret plans to attack Pearl Harbor to the Japanese military’s threats to subvert the government if it sued for peace. Yet rather than clarity and unanimity, the trial brought complexity, dissents, and divisions that provoke international discord between China, Japan, and Korea to this day. Those courtroom tensions and contradictions could also be seen playing out across Asia as the trial unfolded in the crucial early years of the Cold War, from China’s descent into civil war to Japan’s successful postwar democratic elections to India’s independence and partition.
From the author of the acclaimed The Blood Telegram, which was a Pulitzer Prize finalist, this magnificent history is the product of a decade of research and writing. Judgment at Tokyo is a riveting story of wartime action, dramatic courtroom battles, and the epic formative years that set the stage for the Asian postwar era.
7 有用 NoNo 2024-06-21 03:34:48 美国
详实中立的历史巨作,为我厘清了许多思路。东京审判并非为了所谓正义,而是对日方袭击以英方为首的联合阵营所做的惩罚。微妙的是,当高贵的洋大人在亚洲殖民地被日军打得措手不及时,日方的行径看上去也似乎确是“作为亚洲共同体代表,发动对西方的反殖民反种族主义战争“但与此同时也更不能忽视那些被日方刻意隐瞒封锁的杀戮强暴。 种种原因导致庭审一团糟,如检察官并未准备好提审问题,反是日方准备齐全;美方有预设目标即天皇... 详实中立的历史巨作,为我厘清了许多思路。东京审判并非为了所谓正义,而是对日方袭击以英方为首的联合阵营所做的惩罚。微妙的是,当高贵的洋大人在亚洲殖民地被日军打得措手不及时,日方的行径看上去也似乎确是“作为亚洲共同体代表,发动对西方的反殖民反种族主义战争“但与此同时也更不能忽视那些被日方刻意隐瞒封锁的杀戮强暴。 种种原因导致庭审一团糟,如检察官并未准备好提审问题,反是日方准备齐全;美方有预设目标即天皇不定罪;更有印度法官质疑事后审判。战后MAO对日态度更是一变再变,先将审判认定为美帝阴谋,后为与美为敌,站队日本右翼,导致南京学者报告拖到79年才得以内部出版。梅汝敖反对中对日态度的轻描淡写,“勿忘国耻”的言论也导致其被批斗,可这话又成了现如今的主流言论,讽刺荒唐至极。 (展开)
1 有用 Nightwing 2024-03-08 03:54:01 天津
法庭凝固了时间,庭外的世界却在加速演进,大到国家政权的更迭,小到法官爱人的病逝,这本巨作不但理清了东京审判台前幕后多种元素的交互作用和深远影响,还写出了庭上一天、地上十年的沧桑。个人的喜怒哀乐放进国家间意形利益的博弈,再置入世界政治军事大势的变迁,悲痛、愤恨、智慧、妥协还有无处不在的种族、文化层面的碰撞。作者处处彰显一个新闻人的职业素养,援引翔实可靠的史料,佐以第一手的采访,保持中立的同时也不吝中... 法庭凝固了时间,庭外的世界却在加速演进,大到国家政权的更迭,小到法官爱人的病逝,这本巨作不但理清了东京审判台前幕后多种元素的交互作用和深远影响,还写出了庭上一天、地上十年的沧桑。个人的喜怒哀乐放进国家间意形利益的博弈,再置入世界政治军事大势的变迁,悲痛、愤恨、智慧、妥协还有无处不在的种族、文化层面的碰撞。作者处处彰显一个新闻人的职业素养,援引翔实可靠的史料,佐以第一手的采访,保持中立的同时也不吝中肯的质疑评点,激发读者更深的思考。大的原则不容侵犯,但其他部分都是值得重新探讨审视的。佩服梅汝璈的语言、法学素养和不卑不亢、踏实得体的为人,要获得西方的尊重,需要更多这样的人,而不是让他们被内耗掉。这是我读过最好的书之一。 (展开)
0 有用 hanena 2024-01-19 06:07:19 美国
从二战事实、国际政治、反殖民、种族歧视、冷战方方面面的视角来阐述,非常客观中立,受益良多!
0 有用 左岸单行道 2024-01-19 06:11:20 美国
Audible 1.18.2024. 非常客观和详尽的historical account. 从审判时错综复杂的多方政治利益到战后的东亚国际关系都给出了基于史实的解读。几位庭审法官的profile尤其生动,特别是代表中国的梅汝璈和执意dissent的印度法官Pal.
0 有用 Paper Planes 2025-01-31 19:53:09 浙江
一本细节翔实、视角全面、叙事议论切换游刃有余的杰作,完成这样的成就确实需要912页的篇幅。它从二战最后一个阶段开始,介绍了盟军、东亚东南亚及日本的政治、社会、思想背景,从挑选法官过渡到庭审过程,全面展现法官、诉讼、辩方三方的视角与证据。同时也补充了此时法庭外的国际关系变化背景,如美苏冷战、中国内战、东南亚反殖民抗争等对法庭内的影响。它揭示了今天对于太平洋战争的叙事如何被东京审判塑造,我们理想中的东... 一本细节翔实、视角全面、叙事议论切换游刃有余的杰作,完成这样的成就确实需要912页的篇幅。它从二战最后一个阶段开始,介绍了盟军、东亚东南亚及日本的政治、社会、思想背景,从挑选法官过渡到庭审过程,全面展现法官、诉讼、辩方三方的视角与证据。同时也补充了此时法庭外的国际关系变化背景,如美苏冷战、中国内战、东南亚反殖民抗争等对法庭内的影响。它揭示了今天对于太平洋战争的叙事如何被东京审判塑造,我们理想中的东京审判事实上在当时有着怎样的争议。最后一部分也讲述了人们对于东京审判叙事的诠释如何影响了中日关系、日本人对二战的态度、美国人对于国际法庭体系的态度等等。 (展开)