Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is developing in a manner that blurs the boundaries between specific areas of application and expands its capability to be used in a wide range of applications. The public release of ChatGPT, a generative AI chatbot powered by a large language model (LLM), represents a significant step forward in this direction. Accordingly, professionals predict that this technology will affect education, including the role of teachers. However, despite some assumptions regarding its influence on education, how teachers may actually use the technology and the nature of its relationship with teachers remain under-investigated. Thus, in this study, the relationship between ChatGPT and teachers was explored with a particular focus on identifying the complementary roles of each in education. Eleven language teachers were asked to use ChatGPT for their instruction during a period of two weeks. They then participated in individual interviews regarding their experiences and provided interaction logs produced during their use of the technology. Through qualitative analysis of the data, four ChatGPT roles (interlocutor, content provider, teaching assistant, and evaluator) and three teacher roles (orchestrating different resources with quality pedagogical decisions, making students active investigators, and raising AI ethical awareness) were identified. Based on the findings, an in-depth discussion of teacher-AI collaboration is presented, highlighting the importance of teachers’ pedagogical expertise when using AI tools. Implications regarding the future use of LLM-powered chatbots in education are also provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Altman, S. (2022, December 5). Twitter. https://twitter.com/sama/status/1599668808285028353?s=20&t=j5ymf1tUeTpeQuJKlWAKaQ
Bibauw, S., François, T., & Desmet, P. (2019). Discussing with a computer to practice a foreign language: Research synthesis and conceptual framework of dialogue-based CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 827–877.
Bibauw, S., François, T., Van den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2022). Dialogue systems for language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–24.
Bower, M. (2019). Technology-mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, Jeffrey, Winter, C. …, & Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165
Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Jarvela, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66, 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023a). Influence of Pedagogical Beliefs and Perceived Trust on Teachers’ Acceptance of Educational Artificial Intelligence Tools. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023b). Exploring factors influencing students’ intention to use intelligent personal assistants for learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2194927
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative approaches to research (3rd ed.). Merrill/Pearson Education.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning (pp. 525–552). Springer Science + Business Media.
Dizon, G. (2020). Evaluating intelligent personal assistants for L2 listening and speaking development. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 16–26.
Fryer, L., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 8–22.
Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K., & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(December 2018), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023
Heidt, A. (2023). ‘Arms race with automation’: Professors fret about AI-generated coursework. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00204-z
Hew, K. F., Huang, W., Du, J., & Jia, C. (2023). Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities: Learner engagement and perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35, 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09338-x.
Holstein, K., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2020). A Conceptual Framework for Human–AI Hybrid Adaptivity in Education. In: I. Bittencourt, M., Cukurova, K., Muldner, R., Luckin, & E., Millán (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 12163). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_20
Holstein, K., & Aleven, V. (2022). Designing for human–AI complementarity in K-12 education. AI Magazine, 43(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12058
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher–ai complementarity. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.3
Huang, X., Zou D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Society & Technology 26(1), 112–131. https://www.j-ets.net/collection/forthcoming-articles/26_1
Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38, 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gasevic, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles, and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
Jeon, J. (2021). Chatbot-assisted dynamic assessment (CA-DA) for L2 vocabulary learning and diagnosis. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1987272
Jeon, J. (2022a). Exploring a self-directed interactive app for informal EFL learning: a self-determination theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5767–5787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10839-y
Jeon, J. (2022b). Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241
Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2022). Enhancing EFL pre-service teachers’ affordance noticing and utilizing with the Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence strategies: An exploratory study of a customizable virtual environment platform. Computers & Education, 190, 104620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104620
Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873. Advance online publication.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Gunnemann, S., Hullermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Jurgen, P., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T. …, & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 6069–6104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2022). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3. Advanced online publication.
Lee, S., & Jeon, J. (2022). Visualizing a disembodied agent: Young EFL learners’ perceptions of voice-controlled conversational agents as language partners. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2067182
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT. OpenAI. https://chat.openai.com/chat
Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). AI Bot ChatGPT writes smart essays--should professors worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04397-7
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Timpe-Laughlin, V., Sydorenko, T., & Daurio, P. (2022) Using spoken dialogue technology for L2 speaking practice: what do teachers think? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1194–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774904
Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2023). What matters in AI-supported learning: A study of human-AI interactions in language learning using cluster analysis and epistemic network analysis. Computers & Education, 194, 104703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36–45.
Xu, W., & Ouyang, F. A. (2022). A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 4195–4223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10774-y
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418
Zhang, Z., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Yao, B., Ritchie, D., Wu, T., Mo, Y., Wang, D., & Li, T. J. J. (2022). StoryBuddy: A human-AI collaborative chatbot for parent–child interactive storytelling with flexible parental involvement. In CHI ’22: CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–21). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517479
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jeon, J., Lee, S. Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Educ Inf Technol 28, 15873–15892 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1