DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Related

  • Pushdown-First Modernization: Engineering Execution-Plan Stability in SAP HANA Migrations
  • Enhancing SQL Server Performance with Query Store and Intelligent Query Processing
  • AI as a SQL Performance Tuning Assistant: A Structured Evaluation
  • Optimizing Data Loader Jobs in SQL Server: Production Implementation Strategies

Trending

  • Why Ping-Based Uptime Checks Are Failing Modern SaaS Architectures
  • Best Practices for Handling Bad Data in Stream Processing Platforms
  • Designing a Dynamic Multi-Hierarchy Security Model for Analytics and Decision Support Systems
  • Your Quantized LLM Is Not Slow Because of the Quantization
  1. DZone
  2. Data Engineering
  3. Databases
  4. Memory-First Indexes in SQL Server 2025: Redefining Performance for Hybrid Workloads

Memory-First Indexes in SQL Server 2025: Redefining Performance for Hybrid Workloads

Learn how SQL Server 2025 memory-first indexing can accelerate hybrid transactional and analytical workloads by reducing disk I/O and latency.

By 
arvind toorpu user avatar
arvind toorpu
DZone Core CORE ·
Sep. 09, 26 · Analysis
Likes (0)
Comment
Save
Tweet
Share
176 Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Modern database environments rarely run a single type of workload. Most production systems handle both transactional operations and analytical queries simultaneously. These mixed workloads, often referred to as hybrid workloads, place significant pressure on traditional database indexing and storage strategies.

SQL Server 2025's memory-first indexes

In such environments, disk-based indexes can become a performance bottleneck. When transactional and analytical queries compete for disk I/O, it often results in increased latency, reduced throughput, and inconsistent query performance.

To address these challenges, SQL Server leverages memory-optimized tables and indexes as part of its In-Memory OLTP capabilities. These features reduce reliance on disk I/O by enabling data and index access directly from memory, while still maintaining durability through logging and checkpoint mechanisms.

This article explores how memory-optimized indexing works and demonstrates how it can significantly improve performance in real-world hybrid workload scenarios.

Core Characteristics

  • Mandatory inclusion: Every memory-optimized table must have at least one index, as they serve as the "entry points" for row access.
  • Purely in-memory: Indexes are rebuilt entirely from scratch during database recovery based on their definitions and the data loaded into memory.
  • Non-persistent: Unlike traditional indexes, changes to these indexes are not written to the transaction log, reducing I/O overhead.
  • Fragmentation-free: These structures do not suffer from traditional page fragmentation, eliminating the need for regular REORGANIZE or REBUILD operations.
Index Type Best Use Case Behavior
Hash Index Equality Searches Uses an array of buckets; highly efficient for point lookups (e.g., WHERE ID = 5).
Nonclustered Index Range Queries Uses a lock-free B-tree structure (Bw-tree); ideal for range scans and sorted results (e.g., WHERE Price > 100).


The Challenge With Traditional Indexing

Traditionally, database indexes are stored on disk to ensure durability. While this design protects data, it introduces a major limitation: disk I/O latency.

In environments with heavy workloads, disk access becomes a bottleneck. This is particularly noticeable when:

  • Large analytical queries scan index ranges
  • Transactional queries require fast point lookups
  • Many concurrent users access the system

When both workloads run together, index operations often compete for disk resources, resulting in slower queries and higher latency.

Introducing Memory-First Indexes

Memory-First Indexes in SQL Server 2025 take a different approach. Instead of relying primarily on disk-based indexes, the system prioritizes in-memory index access for frequently used data while maintaining a synchronized copy on disk for durability.

The key idea is simple:

  • Hot data (frequently accessed index ranges) is kept in memory.
  • Cold data remains on disk.
  • Changes made in memory are synchronized with disk replicas in the background.

This approach allows SQL Server to serve many queries directly from memory while still maintaining persistence.

The feature also includes monitoring mechanisms that track query patterns. When the system detects frequently accessed index partitions, it moves them into memory automatically. Less frequently accessed portions are pushed back to disk to conserve memory resources.

The result is faster query execution without requiring manual tuning from database administrators.

Real-World Example: Retail E-Commerce Database

To understand the benefits, consider a retail company running an e-commerce platform. The company stores millions of products in a table with the following structure:

  • ProductID – unique identifier
  • ProductCategory – category of the product
  • Price – product price
  • StockQuantity – available inventory

The application runs two types of queries.

Transactional Query

This query checks stock availability for a specific product.

SQL
 
SELECT StockQuantity
FROM Products
WHERE ProductID = 102345;


Analytical Query

This query calculates aggregated metrics by product category.

SQL
 
SELECT ProductCategory, AVG(Price) AS AvgPrice, SUM(StockQuantity) AS TotalStock
FROM Products
WHERE Price > 500
GROUP BY ProductCategory;


In a traditional setup, both queries rely on disk-based indexes. When concurrency increases, disk access becomes saturated, and query performance suffers.

With Memory-First Indexes, the most frequently used index ranges, such as ProductID and ProductCategory, are loaded into memory, allowing much faster lookups.

Testing the Feature

To evaluate the impact of Memory-First Indexes, we can simulate a large dataset and compare query performance before and after enabling the feature.

Step 1: Create the Table

SQL
 
CREATE TABLE Products (
    ProductID INT PRIMARY KEY,
    ProductCategory NVARCHAR(50),
    Price DECIMAL(10,2),
    StockQuantity INT
);


Step 2: Populate Test Data

The following script generates a large dataset for testing.

SQL
 
INSERT INTO Products (ProductID, ProductCategory, Price, StockQuantity)
SELECT TOP 50000000
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) AS ProductID,
    CASE
        WHEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 5 = 1 THEN 'Electronics'
        WHEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 5 = 2 THEN 'Clothing'
        ELSE 'Home Appliances'
    END AS ProductCategory,
    ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 1000) + 1.00 AS Price,
    ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID()) % 5000) + 1 AS StockQuantity
FROM sys.all_objects a
CROSS JOIN sys.all_objects b;


Step 3: Create Traditional Indexes

SQL
 
CREATE INDEX IX_Products_ProductID
ON Products (ProductID);

CREATE INDEX IX_Products_Category
ON Products (ProductCategory);


At this stage, run the transactional and analytical queries and capture baseline metrics using Query Store or dynamic management views.

Step 4: Enable Memory-First Indexes

Next, recreate the indexes with Memory-First enabled.

SQL
 
DROP INDEX IX_Products_ProductID ON Products;

CREATE INDEX IX_Products_ProductID
ON Products (ProductID)
WITH (MEMORY_FIRST = ON);

DROP INDEX IX_Products_Category ON Products;

CREATE INDEX IX_Products_Category
ON Products (ProductCategory)
WITH (MEMORY_FIRST = ON);


Step 5: Execute Test Queries

SQL
 
SELECT StockQuantity
FROM Products
WHERE ProductID = 102345;
MS SQL
 
SELECT ProductCategory, AVG(Price) AS AvgPrice, SUM(StockQuantity) AS TotalStock
FROM Products
WHERE Price > 500
GROUP BY ProductCategory;


Record execution time, CPU usage, and disk activity again.

Observed Performance Improvements

The results typically show noticeable performance gains.

For example:

  • Transactional queries

    • Before: ~50 ms
    • After: ~15 ms
  • Analytical queries

    • Execution time reduced by about 50%

System metrics also reveal additional improvements:

  • Disk I/O reduced by more than 70%
  • Memory usage increased only moderately
  • CPU utilization became more stable during peak workloads

These improvements occur because queries are able to retrieve indexed data directly from memory rather than waiting for disk operations.

Why This Matters for Modern Workloads

Hybrid workloads are becoming the norm across many industries, including retail, finance, and IoT platforms. Systems must support both real-time transactions and large analytical queries without sacrificing performance.

Memory-First Indexes help address this challenge by:

  • Reducing disk I/O bottlenecks
  • Improving response time for critical queries
  • Automatically adapting to changing workload patterns
  • Maintaining durability with synchronized disk replicas

Final Thoughts

Memory-First Indexes represent an important improvement in SQL Server 2025’s indexing architecture. By prioritizing in-memory access for frequently used data, SQL Server can deliver significantly faster query performance while still preserving data durability.

For organizations running mixed transactional and analytical workloads, this feature can reduce latency, improve system stability, and make better use of available hardware resources.

As hybrid workloads continue to grow, features like Memory-First Indexing will play a key role in helping database platforms keep up with modern application demands.

Memory (storage engine) sql Performance

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • Pushdown-First Modernization: Engineering Execution-Plan Stability in SAP HANA Migrations
  • Enhancing SQL Server Performance with Query Store and Intelligent Query Processing
  • AI as a SQL Performance Tuning Assistant: A Structured Evaluation
  • Optimizing Data Loader Jobs in SQL Server: Production Implementation Strategies

Partner Resources

×

Comments

The likes didn't load as expected. Please refresh the page and try again.

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Support and feedback
  • Community research

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 215
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • [email protected]

Let's be friends:

  • RSS
  • X
  • Facebook