AsyncAPI Hack & Conf 2021 - Who Decides on Hackathon winners and Conference CfP #71
Replies: 17 comments 5 replies
|
Count me in for reviewing cfp for the conference. |
|
Count me in for helping review CFPs for the conference. (not hackathon) |
|
Count me as well for CFPs |
|
I'll probably submit to the conference but not the hackathon so I could help with that if you like? Can you tell me a bit more about what I'm committing to first though? |
|
Count me in for any of above . |
|
I'd be happy to help review both/either. |
|
Count me as well for CFPs |
|
I'll volunteer for CFP review 💥 |
|
Aaaay I will volunteer for judging the hackathon! Done it a bunch of times at hackathons and would love to be help out with this |
|
Happy to help with either but prefer the Hackathon |
|
Happy to help with the proposal review. I've done this a few times in the past, most recently for API Specifications Conference. I can recommend https://sessionize.com/ for anonymous review if you're looking for a platform. They make it so you can't see who the speaker is during initial selection. Of course, there's always room for changing things after the fact, which can be good to allow for more diverse content and speakers. |
|
Happy to help with anything if needed 🙂 |
|
Happy to help review CfP |
|
Happy to help with reviews for Cfp and also Hackathon submissions |
|
Happy to review Hackathon submissions 👍 |
|
Happy to help with reviews for Hackathon submissions :) |
|
I'm happy to help with |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We need volunteers to help out with selection of:
If we choose to use TSC members for it, the problem is they cannot support Hackathon-decision making process because some want to take an active part in the event as participants. Another issue is that most members are engineers and we lose the opportunity to ask for opinions of people that do not code but talk to people (as Dev Rel in their companies) or are simply End Users of the spec.
Any volunteers?
All reactions