You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Auto merge of #147372 - jieyouxu:rust-analyzer-main-tests, r=Kobzol
Run main rust-analyzer tests in rust-lang/rust CI
Part of #147370.
MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#923
This PR prepares `rust-analyzer` crates with `in-rust-tree` cargo featues where needed, and and updates bootstrap to run the main `rust-analyzer` tests in rust-lang/rust CI, not just the `proc-macro-srv` crate tests.
This supersedes the earlier attempt at #136779. I was honestly expecting more failures in this PR, but looking back at the previous attempt, that makes sense because we no longer run `i686-mingw` (32-bit windows-gnu) which had a _bunch_ of these failures. In the earlier attempt I also disabled the `i686-mingw`-related failures for `i686-msvc` since I didn't feel like digging into 32-bit msvc at the time. Try results from this PR shows that it's most likely limited to 32-bit windows-gnu specifically.
### `rust-analyzer` test remarks
- I actually had to _remove_ the `CARGO_WORKSPACE_DIR` `expect-test`-hack in order for `expect-test` to be able to find the test expectation HTML files (for `syntax_highlighting` tests in `ide`). When I added the hack, ironically, it made `expect-test` unable to find the expectation files. I think this was because previously the path was of the `proc-macro-srv` crate specifically, now we point to the root r-a workspace?
- The `cfg`-related differences on `aarch64-apple-darwin` might've been fixed? I can't tell, but we don't seem to be observing the differences now.
- I'm not sure why `config::{generate_config_documentation, generate_package_json_config}` no longer fails. Perhaps they were fixed to no longer try to write to source directory?
### Review remarks
- Commit 1 updates r-a crates that are involved in tests needing artifacts from `rustc_private` compiler crates to use the `in-rust-tree` cargo feature. I briefly tried to use a plain `--cfg=in_rust_tree`, but quickly realized it was very hacky, and needed invasive bootstrap changes. The cargo feature approach seems most "natural"/well-supported to both bootstrap and cargo.
- Commit 2 updates bootstrap to not only run the `proc-macro-srv` tests, but the whole r-a tests.
- Commit 3 restricts r-a main tests to non-32-bit targets we test in CI, since (1) r-a repo does not run tests against 32-bit platforms, and (2) there are some target pointer width sensitive hash differences causing tests to fail. Notably, this means that we also no longer run r-a `proc-macro-srv` tests against 32-bit targets, but we don't expect that crate to be have target pointer width differences. Discussed this in [#t-compiler/rust-analyzer > 32-bit tests?](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/32-bit.20tests.3F/with/563145736).
---
// try-job: aarch64-gnu
// try-job: aarch64-apple
// try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
// try-job: i686-msvc-1
// try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
// try-job: aarch64-msvc-1
0 commit comments