Skip to content

scala3 syntax reference: missing SimpleType1 definition #2164

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
unkarjedy opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

scala3 syntax reference: missing SimpleType1 definition #2164

unkarjedy opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@unkarjedy
Copy link
Contributor

SimpleType1 is used in several places but there is no definition of what it is:

https://docs.scala-lang.org/scala3/reference/syntax.html

@Shorla
Copy link
Contributor

Shorla commented Mar 5, 2022

Hi, I am new to contributing to scala repository. Can I work on this @SethTisue or can you direct me to an issue I can start with? thanks.

@Philippus
Copy link
Member

@julienrf
Copy link
Contributor

julienrf commented Mar 7, 2022

@Shorla Thank you for proposing your help! We are currently (this is taking a bit of time, though…) reworking the Scala 3 reference documentation. In this context, it is probably not worth fixing the content of these pages here. Hopefully this issue should be fixed within a couple of weeks.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

@Shorla hello, welcome! we've got a number of issues tagged either "help wanted" or "good first issue" or both. and really, any open ticket is fair game; you can inquire about status or difficulty level on any ticket you're considering working on.

if you want to do something non-trivial that's also very high value, consider #1711

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants