calling people black

Applies to all skin shades.

written record, it’s clearly history, accuracy disclaimers aside.

With that definition, isn’t Frodo dumping the One Ring into a vulcano history too?

Thats… weird. I have Kindle Paperwhite 1st gen. It never kissed a Wifi. It was factory reset at least twice.

I live in EU though. Maybe that’s a difference?

What? No.

Bigos in English is called Hunter’s Stew, and you ideally include wild game meat in it.

Besides that, shitton of spices, few other kinds of meat like pork and sausage, shrooms, prunes, cabbage (required) and onions.

And it must stew for at least half a day.

Yo, a Pole here. Can you explain what the commenter misrepresented and what’s the reality in Germany? I am curious.

I am assuming that like in the rest of the Europe, everyone gets healthcare and education, and that jobless do get welfare, as well as sick people. I can also see that your senior numbers are growing compared to young, so more of the budgets goes to supplement the pension schemes?

(And I don’t think Germany needs skilled/unskilled migrants to fill in open positions, as Germany has what, 3M unemployed people that could be retrained for them)

Both IIRC.

I read it as “while Claude is actively working on this particular file, I do not touch that file”.

because it will confuse Claude. 🤦🏻‍♂️

You’re kidding? Or did he really wrote that?

How would that help? Bots will just move to another instance. Maybe yours.

Consider the fact he was in power for like 20 years, and he was purged during power struggles. And the problem, like always, is not communism, but the fact it was USSR - contemporary communists, like Mao, were calling it socialist in words, imperialist in deeds.

I don’t think his downfall screems “oh, he was arrested for his crimes” - it seems more “he’s getting purged for political reasons”?

As a foreigner whose native tongue has gendered nouns and adjectives: we default to sir to sir-presenting people, ma’am to ma’am presenting, and "sir? ma’am? " when unsure and clarification is needed.

I do not understand why you’d want to preemptively force gender someone by choosing a neutral/or newspeak/ form of address - to me it seems much much much worse than defaulting to asking for preference (“sir? ma’am?” option is the best - it declares you’ve noticed the interlocutor is a nb and passes the ball to them).

If you’re looking for 1 word that would always work, I recommend embracing your inner old British Lady and calling everyone pet (petal), dear or love. :-)

Removed by mod

gay music video night

It’s called a kiki.

Let’s have a kiki: https://youtu.be/eGCD4xb-Tr8

Or a kaikai https://youtu.be/rfWeBYd7rkQ

Oh god no. This is still monopoly. Every company that reaches significantly lower market rate - say 4% - should be forcibly split or wound down (IIRC correctly at 5% market rate it becomes more profitable to buy the competition out so you don’t have to compete with them).

When was the last time China got a trade deal or negotiated settlement because it pointed a load of guns and

~1950.

Imperialism is the stage of Capitalism where a militaristic foreign policy is developed and employed as a continuation of economic policy.

Same book - “socialist in words, imperialist in deeds”? But that doesn’t really matter, as you’re just gonna cherry pick other Lenin quotes at me like if its the Bible. Or call me names.

Nonetheless, I highly recommend the article I linked - but since it might paint a picture that you’re unable to comprehend (or unwilling to entertain), you will of course not read it.

Edit: and if you don’t like that source, here’s another fav of mine https://spectrejournal.com/one-should-not-camouflage-capitalist-and-imperialist-china-as-socialist/.

the US is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and that people still fail to see that after the epstein files is actually shocking

While this is true

https://progressive.international/blueprint/cb7dbaf4-b106-4105-8bde-fdab4bfc2fe8-building-whole-process-peoples-democracy-in-china/en/

To be fair, you didn’t pick ubiased authors here. Neither of the authors is capable of saying anything negative of China.

For example, Paweł Wargan proponent of new Chinese imperialisms with extra steps - e.g. https://www.thecommunists.net/worldwide/global/multi-polar-world-order-is-multi-imperialism/

Like birds! Are women just featherless bipedal land birds?

Who holds the political power in China

On executive level? Princelings.

In the NPC? Worker representatives are 15% vs 50% in the 1970’s. So… bureaucrats and the princelings?