Play is already sandboxed and as was explained to me on their forum, separate profiles do not further isolate apps from each other so I operate with a single profile policy to keep the complexity down. Keep in mind that privacy is not my primary concern but rather the usability of a smartphone so Ymmv.
This PSA brought to you by the folks at Audible.
I understand your point but if it’s obvious, it’s likely easily-guessable and although you are thinking in terms of regaining access to your account, it’s just as important to keep other people from being able to gain access to your account by either guessing it or using social engineering to retrieve the answer.
I’ve used a password manager for many years (1password then bitwarden) and have never had an “oh shit” moment. I use a master password that I’ll never forget, have never needed a hint and have never lost or corrupted a password. I feel that as long as you treat your password manager as something that’s important and deserves your careful management, you’ll be a-ok. I have never once had an issue that was created by the manager itself.
Making the MP hint obvious makes it pointless, in regards to the security to every password you have stored.
would it make more sense to state “By complete coincidence…”?
That depends, would it work as well as our efforts of banning guns and drugs?
Meta and everything they do and stand for is why I chose Signal over Whatsapp.
you should totally crosspost this to /c/conspiracy, you’ll get much more entertaining responses.
It made no positive change in the surplus of weapons on the street. The only people that turned them in were people that would have never used them in the first place and many people in the deep red areas, like where I lived actually went out and bought more guns because they saw it as the beginning of forcefully taking their guns from them.
I would suspect that the only people that benefited from the program was the weapon industry and might have even helped get the program in place.
This reads like stricter age verification propaganda.
The AI uprising has begun.
I consume content here via all/new so my block list is used to make sure I don’t see users, communities and instances that keep me from enjoying my time here. It’s lengthy but does the job well.
Perhaps it’s more complex than a single reason but I believe all scenarios would most likely fall into the bucket of “things were that easy for them and they lack the critical thought to realize that it’s not that easy for everyone else”.
Boomers were buying houses and cars with only one person working, retiring at a decent age and living on mostly social security.
Generational wealth has ensured that their offspring would never have to struggle.
Some settled into a job that truly does pay for all their necessities.
etc., ad nauseum.
Basically, it’s a throwaway statement and I don’t think anyone should lose any sleep feeling like they need to further discuss it with them or defend themselves. They are clearly incapable of stepping outside of their knee-jerk assumptions to find out if they’re accurate or not.
I had no idea either but I did find this while Googling(Kagi-ing?)
https://grammarphobia.com/blog/2010/04/why-is-filipino-spelled-with-an-f.html
This sounds like an argument that an incel would make. You’re supposed to be intelligent enough not to be swayed by the presence of tits.
The attempt to compare the capability of psychological manipulation between AI and squished boobs is absolutely comical.
If someone is using a VPN, they’re at least a little tinkery and privacy-focused so maybe this will be the straw that breaks some of their decency on Microsoft.