The Classical Guitar’s “Proper Posture” Lie

If “proper posture” were actually proper, why have so many classical guitarists come down with carpal tunnel syndrome, focal hand dystonia, tendinitis, and similar ailments? Why are all of them (the well-known cases) followers of classical guitar orthodoxy and none of them “Yepes guys”? And why does something branded as “proper” or even “ergonomic” violate so many principles of actual ergonomics, biomechanics, and somatic disciplines?

What most classical-guitar pedagogy in recent decades calls the “proper posture” — guitar at 45° or more, near-perpendicular (pluck-biased) attack, the inner forearm’s flexor muscles parked on the lower-bout edge, RH wrist flexion + deviation for tone, abducted left shoulder, work outside the ergonomic zone, maximally twisted neck to see first positions, one leg elevated on a footstool (or a “support” that locks in the same geometry) — is not an ergonomic design. It was never worked out from biomechanical principles — or even acoustic ones. It is a visual template that bakes in avoidable load paths + last century’s tone “ideals” (bright, non-projecting, lightweight, dynamically miniaturised sound that records easily with budget- to mid-tier equipment), canonised by authoritarian pedagogy (Segovia’s influence), propaganda, lineage, photography, group-think, and peer pressure, then mis-sold as health.

By contrast, the Narciso Yepes layout — ~25° string angle, oblique (displacement-biased) attack, upper-arm (not forearm) contact with the guitar’s side, uncompressed flexor muscles, relaxed shoulders, neutral wrists, work within the ergonomic power zone, and a Feldenkrais-balanced base — meets the principles of actual occupational/musical ergonomics, solves the very load paths the orthodox pose creates, and scales cleanly to 10-string technique. (It also projects better.)

FIRST, THE YARDSTICKS (real ergonomics)

Across competent ergonomics:

• Neutral joints by default (wrists: ≤15° flexion/extension, ≤15° ulnar/radial deviation).
• No contact stress (no hard edges under neurovascular tracts or muscles in use, e.g., those of the right inner forearm).
• Symmetry at the base (no fixed pelvic obliquity for long durations).
• Short, unconstrained reaches with free scapular motion. (Keep work close to the body, in the ergonomic power zone, between mid-thigh and mid-chest, not head height and off to the left.)
• Task fitted to the body (of an individual), not body forced to fit a photograph.

WHAT THE ORTHODOX “PROPER” TEMPLATE ACTUALLY DOES (and why the body doesn’t want it)

Orthodox “Proper Posture” (annotated stock image).

RIGHT HAND (edge-fulcrum = strain on muscles, tendons, wrist, and nerves)

Bracing the inner forearm’s flexor muscles on the guitar’s edge (or an “arm rest”) makes the wrist a hinge to reach the strings, strains the forearm muscles that are supposed to move the fingers via tendons, and drags those tendons across said hinge. To “colour” the tone, you add deviation on top of flexion: towards the little finger to conform to Segovia/Presti dogma (ulnar deviation → somewhat bright sound = little projection in exchange for TFCC/ECU stress), or towards the thumb for “warmth” (radial deviation → darker sound [more low-mid spectral energy] = more projection in exchange for thenar overuse, first dorsal compartment load). That “tone-by-deviation” approach — colour correction for the tinny tone of a ~90º attack — buys sound with joint distortion → friction, sheath irritation, nerve compression. Predictable fallout: De Quervain’s, carpal tunnel syndromes, Guyon’s canal syndromes, ulnar neuropathies, flexor tendinopathies, and the co-contraction patterns implicated in focal hand dystonia.

Additionally, in the case of a 10-string guitar: With a 45°+ neck and near-perpendicular attack, the right-hand thumb must make a longer, diagonal crossing to string 10, with CMC hyper-abduction/extension + wrist deviation; fingers hook to stay on trebles → forced “C-clamp” hand shape → classic set-up for De Quervain’s (APL/EPB), basal-thumb CMC compression, increased carpal/Guyon pressures, co-contraction and loss of speed/precision. (Ever see a 10-/11-stringed hobbyist seated in the orthodox position struggling to play the instrument’s basses in time? This is why their accuracy and timing suffer; strain and injury may result over time.)

LEFT HAND (steep shoulder tax)

A 45°+ guitar angle forces shoulder abduction + external rotation (ER); many chord shapes pile on extreme forearm supination and wrist flexion. That combination increases scapulo-humeral over-compensation (upper-trapezius/neck co-contraction); raises tissue load at the rotator cuff and biceps; irritates the radial-nerve corridor; increases flexor tendon load and carpal-tunnel pressure; and compromises line-of-force through the flexors/extensors. The “Segovia claw” (fingers parallel to frets + thumb-as-anchor behind 2) reduces adaptability and raises palm/interosseous tone. Musical consequences → less strength, less endurance, less finger independence, smaller reach → increasingly lower action (and smaller scales) on classical guitars over the past 4 decades → loss of dynamic range, loss of musical expression → rise of empty, theatrical body language to “emote.”

SPINE & BREATH (asymmetry baked in)

Pelvic obliquity: the footstool tilts the pelvis, so the lumbar spine side-bends and rotates → thoracolumbar shear. The head/neck must over-rotate left and protract to see the fingerboard (worst in 1st position). The rib cage compresses, reducing diaphragmatic excursion → endurance suffers. None of this is neutral. It’s a blueprint for SCM/levator/upper-trapezius strain, back/neck pain, tension headaches, fatigue, and reduced proprioception.

BOTTOM LINE OF THE TEMPLATE

It violates at least 3 out of 4 non-negotiables of actual ergonomics: neutral joints, work in the power zone, no hard-edge compression of moving muscles, no rigid pelvic asymmetry. Focusing only on the elimination of the footstool (which can, in fact, be compensated for in other ways) still leaves three of these violations: multiple non-neutral joints + an arm held up and away from the body + an edge compression in the worst possible place: the flexor muscles that control the RH touch.

PATHOLOGIES THE ORTHODOX TEMPLATE CORRELATES WITH (what clinicians actually see in guitarists who’ve subscribed to the “proper posture” myth)

• De Quervain’s tenosynovitis; carpal tunnel syndrome; Guyon’s canal syndrome; ulnar neuropathy at the wrist; flexor tendinopathies; lateral/medial epicondylitis.
• Rotator-cuff/bicipital overload; radial nerve irritation near the lateral epicondyle.
• Low-back/SI pain; cervical facet pain; tension headaches; respiratory inhibition.
• Elevated risk factors for focal hand dystonia via chronic co-contraction and repetitive, distorted joint use — especially when combined with mechanical exercises and non-variability (e.g., the “pumping nylon” mentality + “always alternate i and m” dogma).

WHAT THE YEPES LAYOUT FIXES — BY DESIGN

Yepes-informed layout:

• Guitar angle lowered to ≈25°. Oblique string attack comes naturally.
• Right arm: upper arm rests on the guitar’s side; forearm is free; flexor muscles are uncompressed; wrist neutral by default; displacement-biased touch by default. (Flesh + nails — very finely polished, no longer than the fingertips — make simultaneous contact with the strings.)
• Left arm: relaxed shoulder; significantly reduced abduction/external rotation; neutral wrist/finger lines are feasible more often; left arm works with gravity, not against it. No “Segovia claw” — oblique approach is informed by violin/cello technique; the thumb is free to adapt to context (move, wrap, release as needed).
• Trunk/vision: fretboard sits in the natural lower visual field → only a mild left/down glance is needed.†
• Base: balanced not by ditching the footstool but by applying principles of the Feldenkrais Method to the positioning of the right leg + foot.

† [Yepes himself sometimes tilted to the left — perhaps due to the fact that he was nearly blind. This trunk lean isn’t baked into a Yepes-informed posture.]

RIGHT HAND (what loads actually change)

• No distal fulcrum; forearm floats. Wrist stays near neutral as the default; stability from system geometry, not from ergonomically illegal bracing against muscles in motion.
• The flexor muscles that actually move the fingers via tendons aren’t being compressed against a hard edge; those tendons aren’t being dragged across the edge of a bent wrist.
• Oblique attack aligns finger travel with the forearm axis → shorter excursion, less tendon glide/friction, cleaner release, and a naturally “warmer” (darker, better-projecting) sound without wrist distortion.
• 10-string: With a ~25° neck and oblique attack, the thumb path to the farthest basses is shorter and aligns with neutral CMC motion → less tendon glide, lower peak moments at wrist/CMC, better timing and precision at speed. Yepes’s geometry scales to hyperhexal guitars [guitars with “more than 6” strings] — the orthodox geometry doesn’t. On a 10-string, that isn’t a preference; it’s a structural requirement.

LEFT HAND (shoulder, forearm, wrist)

• Lowering the guitar neck reduces left-shoulder abduction/rotation and, thus, shoulder demands to near nothing.
• Actions are kept within the ergonomic power zone (i.e., close to the body, above mid-thigh and below mid-chest height), not head height and off to the left.
• Left arm works with gravity, not against it. In the orthodox position, the entire arm wants to drop down from the shoulder to undo abduction. The orthodox geometry has to be maintained through constant active effort from the deltoid and supporting muscles in the rotator cuff (i.e., permanent tonic contraction, which wastes energy and builds fatigue). In the Yepes position, gravity now acts only on the forearm (a lighter, shorter lever), which wants to drop forwards (to extend the elbow). The thumb now acts as stabiliser: light, passive thumb contact with the neck provides a simple counterforce to gravity’s pull on the forearm. No continuous lifting at the shoulder — just a local, minimal balancing action.
• With the orthodox geometry, shoulder muscles are also recruited for fret/position changes; this is mechanically inefficient — moving a big lever to accomplish a fine adjustment — and puts additional, repetitive strain on the shoulder. With Yepes’s position, instead, the forearm pivots from the elbow, swinging slightly in and out relative to the torso. This “swing” is subtle — a change of angle at the elbow, gently driven by the upper arm muscles around the elbow (not usually the shoulder abductors). The forearm’s swing handles position changes smoothly → less gross effort, more localised control, and less cumulative strain. It matches what violinists/cellists do, not shoulder heaving for the sake of the mythical “Segovia claw.”
• Left hand, informed by violin/cello technique (which Yepes learned from Asencio, Cassadó, and Enesco), ditches forced parallels and “thumb behind 2” dogma. The orthodox LH “claw” does nothing but promote clamping and co-contraction, worsen finger independence, add tension, and impede reach. With Yepes’s oblique finger approach, reach and fluidity improve: fretting the strings on a slight diagonal reduces abduction at the MCP joints (i.e., each finger doesn’t have to “fan out” sideways because the angle lets them share some of the spread along the natural arc of the hand → same/bigger reach with less strain); this eases 3–4 finger placements, and smooths position changes — mirroring what motion-science work documents for violin left-hand shifting and economy of motion.

• A relaxed shoulder also lets the left wrist run closer to straight more often. A less supinated forearm and straighter wrist → straighter forearm path, lower pressure and cleaner gliding in the tendons → improved flexor/extensor efficiency, force transmission, and finger independence.
• Dynamic thumb use replaces the “thumb behind 2” anchor myth. The thumb position changes with the fluid musical context.
• Net result: lower cumulative tissue load; greater strength, endurance, fluidity, and finger independence; wider, more relaxed reach; and cleaner sound. The instrument’s proper/historical action can be restored ‡— not the “expensive toy” action that most luthiers have built into guitars over the past 4 decades, to ease an over-burdened left hand, resulting in miniaturised dynamics and the substitution of cheap theatrics for musical expression.

‡ Guitars of the 1960s and ‘70s had higher action than today’s. Surviving witnesses, like Yepes alumnus Fritz Buss, recall that their guitars had even higher action in the 1930s and ‘40s — before the widespread dissemination of Segovian propaganda + Aaron Shearer’s method — the first to explicitly prescribe “Neck of guitar a 45° angle with floor” and headstock near eye level (Classic Guitar Technique, 1959)— resulted in the “proper posture” myth becoming institutional orthodoxy by the 1990s. Since then, predictably, action has been lowered — with nontrivial musical consequences.

SPINE, HEAD, AND BREATH

• With ~25° neck, the fingerboard sits in the natural lower field of vision → a much milder left/down glance is required; cervical alignment is closer to neutral; breathing is freer.
• In the “Yepes school,” we use a footstool (preferably a level one) because no adjustable guitar support exists to hold ~25°. Crucially, Yepes used a Feldenkrais-informed counter-placement of the right leg + foot to balance pelvic asymmetry dynamically. If a support existed that preserved ~25°, both feet could rest flat with a level pelvis.

BALANCED BASE (Feldenkrais)

Yepes incorporates a smart, Feldenkrais-consistent, body-aware countermeasure to the footstool’s built-in asymmetry. Feldenkrais teaches that posture is not a goal, but a dynamic means — an organisation for action with minimal effort, maximal reversibility. He warns against fixing the body into symmetrical appearances when functional asymmetries are imposed (e.g., a raised left leg).

Yepes’s right foot angle is a classic Feldenkrais solution:

• The elevated left leg causes the pelvis to tilt up on the left, inducing pelvic obliquity and often axial rotation.
• Rather than forcing the torso to look symmetrical (which increases muscular bracing), the right foot turns out to realign the right hip and sacrum, letting the spine decompress and lengthen effortlessly.
• This brings the pelvis towards a functional neutral, even if it looks asymmetrical.

The toe-out right foot is not unconscious; it’s a small, high-leverage adjustment that neutralises the footstool’s pelvic torsion, protects the knee, frees the hips and breath, and supports Yepes’s neutral right-hand mechanics. This is a textbook case of the Feldenkrais principle: don’t fight asymmetry — organise around it. It’s a micro-adjustment with macro-effects.

BALANCED BASE (biomechanical view)

Pelvis: Countering Obliquity

• Raising the left foot hikes the left iliac crest.
• External rotation of the right leg via toe-out counteracts that hike, letting the sacroiliac joints balance their loading.
• Pelvic torsion is partially reversed, reducing the compensatory curve in the lumbar spine.

Hip Joint: Promoting External Rotation

• Toes pointed outwards allow the femur to sit more neutrally in the acetabulum. That means less muscular effort to maintain uprightness.
• Avoids forced internal rotation of the right leg, which would otherwise restrict hip movement and pinch the psoas.

Knee: Aligning with Natural Gait

• The external rotation of the foot lets the patella track properly — knee over second toe, preventing valgus stress and medial strain.
• This also preserves spiral integrity of the leg (from foot arch → tibia → femur → hip), allowing small postural adjustments without muscular fight.

Foot: Spreading Ground Contact

• The tripod base (heel, big toe, little toe) is preserved.
• Toe-out lets the right foot bear more weight comfortably, compensating for the centre-of-mass shift to the left (due to footstool + guitar).
• Enhances both lateral and anterior-posterior stability.

Breathing, Spinal Decompression

• With the right foot turned out and the pelvis better oriented, the waist and ribs on the right side open up.
• Breathing becomes less lateralised, with diaphragmatic action preserved. This supports endurance and focus.

WHY “SUPPORTS” AREN’T THE FIX YOU WERE PROMISED

Commercial supports (Sagework, ErgoPlay, Gitano, Dynarette, etc.) enforce the 45°+ neck geometry + its unspoken ergonomic, biomechanical, and acoustic shortcomings. They may level the pelvis (good), but they lock in the raised left shoulder (that’s work outside the ergonomic zone), the twisted neck, the distal fulcrum (compression of muscles in use), the near-perpendicular attack (tinny sound by default), and thus the wrist deviations for warmth — i.e., they function as gates of orthodoxy with suction cups, not as holistic ergonomic solutions. By design, they can’t be adjusted to accommodate Yepes’s biomechanically- and acoustically-informed geometry. Thus, they serve as a convenient decoy, allowing the orthodoxy to market itself as supposedly “ergonomic” while violating several ergonomic principles in order to cling to twentieth-century tonal ideals: bright yet non-projecting, lightweight, and dynamically miniaturised, all dependent on amplification. By slapping on a specious “Good for You” label, these so-called supports divert attention from far more critical issues — not the pelvis, but the very anatomy that actually produces the sound.

SOMATIC DISCIPLINES (what they teach vs how they’re misused)

Alexander Technique and Feldenkrais Method do not prescribe rigid shapes. They prioritise neutrality, adaptable symmetry, dynamic balance, and awareness of load paths. Invoking these methods to justify the orthodox posture is a category error. Yepes actually studied these disciplines (Feldenkrais with Moshe Feldenkrais himself; also, Seitai with Katsumi Mamine) and imported their logic into guitar use long before mainstream classical guitarists ever started cherry-picking from them. That’s why his layout works as a system.

[I studied both Alexander and Feldenkrais with certified instructors in Sydney; neither insisted on anything resembling the orthodoxy’s “proper posture.” Crucially, my Feldenkrais instructor independently recommended precisely the same adjustments to the right leg + foot that I later recognised in photos/videos of Yepes.]

I, too, used the “proper posture” — before I knew better.

PEDAGOGY, IDEOLOGY, AND WHY “proper posture prevents injury” IS A LIE IN EFFECT

• The orthodox template was not designed from biomechanics; it was canonised by photography, lineage, and above all a twentieth-century, Modernist mania for control and standardisation (like Segovian pedagogy), justified by classical guitar magazine propaganda.

• Teachers often pass on a look they were taught and adopted uncritically, then retrofit rationales (“NO MORE PAIN,” “BEWARE neutral wrists,” “stabilise on the edge,” “how not to destroy your body!”). That is misinformation with consequences.
• Some co-opt Alexander/Feldenkrais language while prescribing the very geometry those disciplines undermine.
• In competitions/classrooms, visual conformity is rewarded over musicianship, fit-to-body design, and biomechanical/acoustic facts; pupils are often under duress to conform. (I know of students “put through hell” because they didn’t; predictably, many drop out of Music degrees.) Those reporting relief with a more neutral setup — or preference for a darker/projecting tone — are told it’s “incorrect.” That is institutional gaslighting — orthodoxy protecting itself.

Call it what it is: SYSTEMIC MISREPRESENTATION sold as if it were “injury prevention.” It isn’t. Nor has it been standard practice for more than half a century: it’s not even a true tradition.

Intentions may vary, but the outcome remains a harmful lie.

QUICK SELF-AUDITS

1. Three-N Rule of Ergonomics: Neutral joints; No hard-edge compression; No fixed pelvic asymmetry. If you can’t keep wrist flexion ≤15° and deviation ≤15° by default, the system is wrong — not you. The same goes, if you can’t play the guitar without bearing down on the inner forearm (flexor muscles).

Get Viktor van Niekerk’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

2. Head-Turn Test: Can you see first-position work with only a small left/down glance? Is it in the ergonomic zone (not head height)? If you must crank the neck to the max, the geometry is wrong.

3. Left-Shoulder Check: Compare tension with the shoulder relaxed (arm hanging) versus held in abduction over a period of time.

4. Deviation-for-Tone Check: If “warmth” only appears when you play “tasto” and/or deviate the wrist, the system is wrong and you’re buying tone with joint + tendon stress. In a Yepes layout, warmth/projection appear without wrist deviation. (Check by ear — not recording technology, which inevitably alters the spectral recipe — or have a neutral + competent auditor like a non-guitarist musician check it for you.)

HOW TO TRANSITION TO YEPES’S ERGONOMICALLY AND ACOUSTICALLY INFORMED TEMPLATE (practical steps)

• Begin by filing the nails not with an acoustically nonsensical “ramp” (which causes the string to twist around its axis, producing HF “chiff”), not curved (which, produces a tinny, plucked sound), but nearly straight across and no longer than the fingertips, so that both flesh and nail can make simultaneous contact with the string, displacing it towards the soundboard and slightly towards the bass side — not plucking it. The playing edge must be polished to the consistency of glass/marble, with absolutely no remaining burrs/swarf left along or under the playing edge. Crucially, the 500-grit sandpaper normally promoted to guitarists is inadequate for truly clean tone production — it can be used, at best, as an intermediate step between a fine crystal file (for quick shaping) and various polishing tools of significantly higher grit.
• Balance the base by applying this Feldenkrais-informed right-foot counter to the pelvic obliquity imposed by the footstool:
  ◦ Start seated with left foot on the stool, both feet flat. Notice sit-bone pressure and any trunk lean.
  ◦ Pivot the right foot out on the heel until knee and second toe point the same way (often ~10–20°, sometimes a touch more).
  ◦ Let the right knee drift a few millimetres outwards; don’t collapse the arch — keep tripod contact (heel + 1st & 5th metatarsal heads).
  ◦ Recheck: pelvis feels more square; right waist longer; breathing easier.
  ◦ The goal is neutral organisation, not a “duck-foot.” Too much toe-out (>~30°) can over-pronate the foot and load the medial knee.
  ◦ Individual anatomy varies (femoral anteversion/tibial torsion). Find the minimum toe-out that equalises sit-bone pressure and quiets compensations.
  ◦ Keep the cue: “Patella points where the second toe points.” If those diverge, fix it.
  ◦ Bonus hint: an old-fashioned, level footstool is ergonomically superior to the mass-produced ones, though lacking their height adjustability — adjust/change the chair instead. The adjustable footstool being sold to guitarists — slanted and designed to bear weight (i.e., the heel) on the lower end, thus imposing dorsiflexion of the foot/ankle and tension in the shin — is yet another example of the far-reaching ergonomic ignorance undergirding classical-guitar culture.
• Lower the guitar and line of strings to ≈25°. Rest the smaller (upper) bout on the left leg, the larger (lower) one on the right leg. (Less of the guitar body’s surface area is in contact with the player — this also increases sonority, to some extent.)
• Don’t cant the soundboard. You don’t have to see the fingerboard, only a side-view of it. Angling the guitar upwards (or 45°+) aims the beamy, HF content of the spectrum away from the audience.
• Move right arm contact proximally: rest the upper arm on the side of the lower bout.
• Free the forearm; stop “stabilising” by compressing flexor muscles against a hard edge.
• Adopt oblique attack and keep the wrist neutral by default (don’t ulnar deviate to maintain orthodox plucking technique — displace the string with flesh + nail touching it simultaneously). Let “warmth” and projection come from attack geometry, not wrist deviation. The closer to horizontal the guitar is positioned, the “warmer” (actually darker) and more projecting the neutrally resulting tone should be.
• For the 10-string specifically: verify the shorter, more neutral thumb path to string 10 (with fingers on trebles); your bass timing and accuracy should improve rapidly.
• Relax the left shoulder; you no longer need to lift it — certainly, never outside the ergonomic power zone.
• Shift positions by pivoting from the elbow; this motion naturally supinates gently towards 1st position.
• Let the left-hand thumb adapt as needed; stop anchoring it behind 2. The thumb may approach the neck with its tip/pad only, wrap its entire length around the neck, act as a pivot while shifting between two positions, release entirely, etc., depending on the musico-technical context.
• Fret the strings with an oblique approach as violinists/cellists stop theirs, the way the fingers naturally arc when relaxed while the palm is gently supinated upwards — your reach will be bigger, with less tension. Stop trying to hold “fingers parallel to frets” + “palm parallel to fretboard” — it’s not biomechanically informed.
• Maintain neutral LH wrist as often as possible. If a musical context requires a degree of flexion, keep it ≤15º, if possible.
• Bonus hint re YouTube videos on the topics of “Dos vs Don’ts,” “Pros vs Noobs,” and “Common Mistakes” — they’re not about helping you. More often than not, this is orthodoxy protecting itself, looking for false dilemmas and easy, visual excuses not to have to engage ethically with or even listen to its Others, like Yepes. For example, if a left-hand finger tells you it wants to release tension by briefly stretching out, at an opportune moment, rather than staying locked in “efficient” readiness, listen to your body — it knows what it needs and what it doesn’t. That’s what somatic disciplines like Alexander and Feldenkrais are really about: bodily awareness — not Modernist, “efficiency-” and standards-obsessed straightjackets.

MYTH VS FACT

MYTH: “Proper posture prevents injury.”
FACT: What classical guitarists are calling “proper posture” violates multiple ergonomic principles; the risk factors are built in. “Proper posture” with a “guitar support”? = Neutral joint violations and contact stress with suction cups.

MYTH: “BEWARE! Neutral wrists are dangerous” / “floating forearms are unstable.”
FACT: Neutral + free is the baseline of every sane ergonomic discipline; system-level positioning provides stability. Evidence-based posture starts neutral by default. Those who say otherwise are either lying to you or to themselves.

MYTH: “Supports are ergonomic.”
FACT: Current supports enforce the same 45°+ geometry; they solve one problem (pelvis) while preserving the rest. Hardware ≠ solution if the geometry remains the problem. Blaming everything on the footstool is a convenient red herring.

MYTH: “Somatic methods justify the orthodox look.”
FACT: Those methods reject static shapes and teach neutrality/adaptability. The Yepes layout was informed by them long before classical-guitar orthodoxy started cherry-picking from them. Yepes worked with Moshe Feldenkrais himself.

A WORD TO THE GATEKEEPERS (and to the injured)

“BEWARE of neutral wrists,” “this is how to hold the classical guitar PROPERLY,” “this means NO MORE PAIN,” “this is how to hold a guitar without destroying your body!” — we’ve heard it all before…from people too young and/or nowise medically informed enough to make such predictions about themselves, leave alone the future of your body.

Stop confusing a photograph, group-think, or peer pressure with good science, good pedagogy, or good musicianship. Instead, start honouring actual physiology and acoustics. Teach/adopt evidence-based principles, not a photograph. Fit the instrument to the (individual) player, not the player to a myth. Follow the principles, personalise them, and let the music — not the template — decide the rest. That’s the important thing, after all: the music.

If you prefer the orthodox (Modernist) tone ideals over Yepes’s, that’s fine — these are complementary approaches, each with its pros and cons, and there is room enough in the world for multiple ways of doing to coexist — but be honest with yourself and others about the relation between those tone ideals and the orthodox posture. Words like “proper” or “best” aren’t the proper or best way of talking about such things. Neither is slapping a “Good for You” label on it, if the science doesn’t support it holistically.

BOTTOM LINE

The classical guitar’s “proper posture” myth is a Modernist aesthetic convention passed off as health. It concentrates stress where you can least afford it (arms, wrists, flexor mass) and then blames you or anything but the system itself when injury results. The Yepes layout is the rare system developed by a top concert guitarist that actually incorporates both ergonomics/biomechanics and acoustics at the design level. Calling orthodoxy “how to hold a guitar properly without destroying your body” is misinformation. The Yepes layout meets real ergonomic criteria. The orthodox template does not.

A CODA ON PROPAGANDA (Graham Wade, Orthodoxy, and the Suppression of Yepes)

Understanding why biomechanically flawed systems persist despite obvious evidence requires examining the mechanisms that protect orthodoxy from scrutiny. Institutional figures don’t typically acknowledge that the methods they’ve championed cause harm — instead, they deflect blame onto footstools, “overwork,” individual bodies, or the inherent difficulty of the instrument itself. This defensive rationalisation isn’t accidental; it is how systems protect themselves when confronted with their failures. To illustrate how this works in practice, let’s examine how Graham Wade responds in YouTube interviews when forced to acknowledge the injury epidemic his promoted classical-guitar orthodoxy has helped to create.

Graham Wade on YouTube.

SUMMARY OF WADE’S POSITION

He says playing the guitar is inherently unnatural, something we only try to make seem natural. He acknowledges many of his contemporaries (e.g., Bream) suffered back problems, but blames this on “working too hard.” When pressed, he blames the footstool. He then admits that even John Williams now has hand problems, though he claims Williams makes everything “look natural.”

He generalises: the profession itself carries the danger of injury. He attributes this to hours of practice → “just over-use syndrome.” He adds that giving concerts is “intrinsically unnatural,” because the load on the fingers and arms is inevitably very strenuous, no matter how one plays. [Even with today’s no-action, “toy” guitars!?]

He points to Julian Bream, claiming [without specifics] that there’s a lot to learn from him because he changed his way of playing in his 30s [allegedly].

He blames the “repetitive concept,” but does not explain how playing is repetitive in a damaging way. He blames pieces being [supposedly] too difficult, over-working, and repetition more generally.

Finally, in a dark turn, he blames it on the individual body: some people are physically able to play without injury, others are not.

THE CONTRADICTION LAID BARE

Wade makes an extraordinary admission. He is aware that the system he helped establish is biomechanically “unnatural” and that classical guitarists have been injured.

But what follows is worse. No meaningful attempt to correct the mechanics — only vague moral appeals to “hard work,” fatalistic shrugs about “the profession,” and platitudes about “learning from Bream” and “changing your playing in your 30s.”

He knows the geometry is broken. Yet he suppresses, as per usual, the insights of the only significant concert guitarist who had the courage and foresight to rebuild the geometry from first ergonomic (and acoustic) principles — Narciso Yepes.

“REPETITION” ISN’T THE PROBLEM (repetition + orthodoxy is)

Wade blames injuries on “overuse syndrome” and the “repetitive concept.”

No. Repetition alone is not the problem. Repetition in poor alignment is the problem:

• Typists, pianists, violinists, surgeons etc. repeat.
• They don’t appear to break down to the same extent.

What’s different in classical guitar orthodoxy?

• Repetition in non-neutral joint angles
• With chronic static load
• Under conditions of asymmetry and compression
• Reinforced by pedagogical dogma that makes these non-negotiable, with near-zero variability (e.g., the “always alternate i and m” dogma)
• Specifically: deviated wrists, abducted shoulders, asymmetric spines, twisted necks, compression of muscles in use, work outside the ergonomic zone

Hours aren’t the issue. Angles are. And how those hours are spent — either intelligently, consciously, or on mindless, dogmatic repetition (“no pain no gain,” “pumping nylon”) within a biomechanically questionable system, untruthfully touted as “ergonomic.”

THE FOOTSTOOL? (a symptom, not the cause)

Wade predictably blames the footstool. Of course he does. Because the footstool is an easy scapegoat. It’s a visible target, and it lets orthodoxy off the hook. But it’s not the root.

Footstools and (even more so) “guitar supports” enable a 45° guitar angle that:

• Twists the (cervical) spine (to see 1st-position work)
• Induces left shoulder elevation and abduction
• Forces deviation in the right wrist for colour correction
• Compresses flexor muscles in use against a hard edge
• Imposes work outside the ergonomic power zone

All of this is solved by the Yepes posture.

In keeping with Wade’s decades of myth-making and gatekeeping in the world of the classical guitar, when it comes to Narciso Yepes’s innovations, such insights are omitted from the narrative.

“SOME PEOPLE JUST BREAK” = EUGENICS, NOT PEDAGOGY

Wade shrugs: Some have the body to do it without injury, some don’t.

This is grotesque. It’s not pedagogy — it’s weeding. And it admits a dark truth: the system selects for genetic survivors, not those with healthy technique; not those with good musicianship; not those best at resonating with general (non-guitarist) audiences.

Yepes didn’t accept eugenic ‘thinking.’ He designed technique around (individual) human anatomy, and acoustics, not ideology.

WHAT WADE WON’T SAY, AND WHY

Let’s be clear:

Wade’s comments are a tacit acknowledgment of the failures of the very Modernist system of guitar-playing he spent his career glorifying.

Wade’s comments admit:

• The system causes injury
• The postures are unnatural
• The injuries are real
• The system is rigged against longevity

Yet he:

• Blames the player, not the method
• Blames overwork, not geometry
• Blames footstools, not angles
• Mentions Bream, but not Yepes

Why? Because Yepes’s approach proves orthodoxy wrong.

Wade’s omission re Yepes here, as always, is not accidental. It is theoretical repression. The very existence of Narciso Yepes (unless tokenised or mischaracterised) disproves Wade’s mythical narrative — in this case, that injuries are inevitable, that posture is secondary, that hard work and difficult repertoire are the culprits.

In a future series of videos/essays, I’ll be applying techniques from the analysis of myth, literature, and propaganda to reveal precisely how Wade’s influential book, Traditions of the Classical Guitar (1980) operates:

1. as a Modernist narrative,

2. as myth, and

3. as authoritarian propaganda intended to

4. subliminally prejudice its readers against Narciso Yepes.

FINAL WORD (the emperor’s cracked spine)

Wade’s logic is clear:
Playing guitar causes injuries. That’s just how it is.
Some people cope, others don’t.
Blame the work, not the method.
Blame the player, not the posture.
Blame the footstool, not the 45° neck angle.
But never — never — blame the orthodoxy Wade spent his life defending.

Nevertheless, the evidence is in:

• Carpal tunnel syndrome
• Herniated discs
• Burned-out hands
• Silenced careers

Meanwhile, Narciso Yepes, the one who redesigned guitar posture from first ergonomic and acoustic principles, was buried under decades of mischaracterisation — thanks in part to Wade and his circle.

Yepes didn’t “look natural.” He was natural.
And that, apparently, was unforgivable.

#ClassicalGuitar #GuitarTechnique #MusicErgonomics #NarcisoYepes #GuitarPosture #MusicEducation #PerformanceInjury #Biomechanics #GuitarPedagogy #MusicalHealth #FeldenkraisMethod #ClassicalMusic #GuitarTeaching #RepetitiveStrainInjury #MusicianHealth #10StringGuitar #GuitarScience #AaronShearer #GuitarOrthopraxy #MusicianWellness