Those who continue to deny the Bible changes need to start explaining why.
Because the time for repeating a couple of misunderstood preservation promises and calling a growing number of people names, is starting to wear a bit thin.
It’s become very apparent there’s a disconnect between those trying to get the message out about the Bible changes, and those still refusing to listen.
The shocking events in the Little Season community over the last few weeks have revealed the most fervent deniers have not done any research, at all. Some claim to, but it quickly becomes apparent that’s not the case.
They’ve clearly got no understanding of this subject and are running purely on emotional denial. And where have we seen that before..? Oh yes, among the most die-hard ‘futurists’ when presented with the notion that Jesus has already returned.
I think we’ve all grown weary of the scalding cries of ‘charlatans’, ‘heretics’ and ‘liars’ etc.. and need to move on to actually discussing these reported changes objectively, some of which are so overtly horrific they need to be properly scrutinised and questions need answering.
Here’s an example of one posted recently by BookOfLife144 on Malachi 2:3, which now reads… “Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it.”
If you want to argue the once beautiful and poetic prose of the KJV always read like that, fine go ahead, but what’s your actual explanation for all the testimonies of lifelong KJV readers and the residue that says it didn’t?
How many of those unwilling to accept this is happening only even started reading the KJV within the last 10 years, after many of the changes had already occurred according to the old timers and those who started noticing them over a decade ago at least?
How do you explain all of the hundreds of changes being pointed out by the many channels who’ve been devoted to this subject for years, and explain all the residue they show proving how verses used to read?
I mean, do you even know what genuine residue is, and how to find it and distinguish it from non-residue? Are you aware that many changes are KJV only, while some affect only newer versions, and others can be ‘universal’ affecting all translations?
Have you spent hours doing the due diligence on reported changes, and painstakingly checked them across online sources, multiple translations and hard copies to verify them?
Do you know that Strong’s Concordance is also being heavily targeted and affected by changes (sometimes but not always correlating with specific Bible changes) as are the original Greek and ‘Hebrew’ manuscripts and even the lexicon word definitions in some cases?
Have you spent time considering how we may have all been misled to believe the Bible is untouchable through the misunderstanding of the preservation verses, and how that may have been a deliberate long term deception to set us up for what’s happening now?
And what about the retroactive nature of these changes? Do you know that every time a change happens almost everything related to it going all the way back in time also changes? Apart from whatever leftover traces of residue that might still exist, if we’re fortunate.
Get Jesus Kept His Word’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
So no, it doesn’t matter how old the oldest Bible you can find is, it’s got the change in that too! As have the old commentaries, recorded sermons and everything else associated with it, like it’s always been that way.
This is what we’re dealing with.
People can’t just keep sticking their fingers in their ears and quoting Psalm 12:6–7 ad nauseam, while ignoring the fact the Bible is very evidently and verifiably changing at an alarming rate.
Without running to ChatGPT for help, we want your explanation why ‘wineskins’ have vanished from the KJV, but are still in the NKJV?
We want to hear why people in biblical times are now wearing ‘shoes’ instead of sandals, and owning ‘stuff’ instead of belongings, and putting their money in ‘the bank’?
Explain to us why Jesus is now spitting directly in people’s eyes to heal them? And why female sheep and ‘turtles’ are now being sacrificed?
Why is Rachel sitting on the camel’s ‘furniture’ instead of a saddle? How is it that Sarai is now giving Hagar to be Abram’s ‘wife’? Wouldn’t that have made Ishmael the rightful heir by law?
Why is ‘corn’ now mentioned 94 times in the KJV when we’re officially told it wasn’t even a thing in the Middle East? Why are God’s commands now written on ‘tables’ instead of tablets? Why does the Lord’s prayer now say ‘debts’ instead of trespasses?
How is ‘charity’ now greater than love? Since when did Jesus explain things in ‘proverbs’ and not parables? Why does the dove now bring back an olive ‘leaf’ instead of a branch? Why is Noah now called ‘Noe’, and Jeremiah referred to as ‘Jeremy’?
And these are just some of the ‘harmless’ ones, many more that I don’t even want to repeat are clearly blasphemous, change the meanings of verses, promote questionable practices, introduce demonic themes and change the character of God.
This is what those who claim the Bible isn’t changing are inadvertently defending and supporting, through their refusal to listen to others who are trying to warn them and do the research themselves.
I defy anyone to spend serious time researching this subject properly, and then come back and say ‘no the Bible’s not changing’.
It’s not possible, because it is.
If you’re unwilling to do the study required or accept that these changes are happening, then please just give us your attempt at an explanation for them.
Thank you.
‘Is the Bible ‘supernaturally’ changing? Examining the evidence of supernatural Bible changes and the Mandela effect, in a season of deception’ — available on Amazon USA (search for title directly in other countries).
Testimonies: https://thesupernaturalbiblechanges.com/testimonies
