Sitemap
The Rambler

The Rambler

Filmmaker, and film enthusiast. youtube.com/@TheRambler5000

Dominic and the Ladies’ Purse Review

5 min readFeb 14, 2025

--

8/10

Press enter or click to view image in full size

Gautham Vasudev Menon is my favourite Tamil director — a true director’s director. Watching his films, you can always sense that he understands cinema instinctively, not just as a storyteller but as someone who lives and breathes the craft. He’s the kind of filmmaker who belongs on a set, shaping performances, rhythms, and visuals in real time. Over the past few years, GVM himself has spoken openly about his frustration at not being able to direct as much as he wanted, instead turning to acting largely for financial reasons. That context makes this film especially satisfying, because it feels like a director returning to what he does best. Thankfully, he is back — and this film clearly benefits from that renewed focus.

At its core, GVM’s Malayalam debut is a well-directed, well-acted comedy investigation drama, elevated by strong cinematography and a very effective score. The technical polish is immediately apparent. The camera work is clean and confident, framing conversations and investigations in a way that keeps things visually engaging without drawing unnecessary attention to itself. The music complements the tone perfectly, enhancing both the humour and the mystery without overpowering either.

A common criticism I’ve seen is that the film is “predictable” and that only Mammootty’s performance works, particularly in terms of comedy. That is just plain wrong.

The screenplay is quite strong overall. Yes, it has a few hiccups — moments where the pacing falters slightly or certain ideas could have been developed further — but it is far from predictable. The narrative unfolds in a way that keeps you engaged, and the investigation elements are structured with enough care to avoid feeling routine.

The Sherlock Holmes influence is clearly present, but it’s handled with restraint. This isn’t a case of blindly copying tropes or leaning too heavily on eccentric genius clichés. Instead, the film borrows the spirit of sharp observation and deductive reasoning, while still feeling grounded in its own world. Importantly, it never loses its sense of originality. The film stands on its own and doesn’t rely on its influences as a crutch.

The screenplay and making is honestly something I’ve never seen before in Malayalam or India. But that isn't anything new for Malayalam these days.

Performances

Gokul Suresh delivers a solid performance, and his chemistry with Mammootty works well. Their interactions feel natural, and the dynamic between them adds warmth and humour to the investigation. It’s not just a mentor–assistant relationship played straight; there’s personality and rhythm to their scenes together, which helps maintain viewer interest throughout.

Get The Rambler’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Mammootty, of course, delivers a strong performance, as he almost always does. He is completely convincing in the role, anchoring the film with his screen presence and understated control. While this isn’t an epic Mammootty performance on the level of some of his career-defining roles, that’s perfectly fine — and arguably appropriate — for this kind of film. The character doesn’t demand grand emotional outbursts or towering dramatic moments; instead, it requires restraint, intelligence, and quiet authority, all of which Mammootty handles with ease.

What truly matters in this film is not a single powerhouse performance, but the investigation itself and the way the story unfolds. The narrative is designed to be driven by observation, logic, and gradual revelation rather than spectacle, and Mammootty understands that balance well. He never overshadows the story, instead allowing the investigation to remain the central focus. In that sense, his performance works in service of the film rather than dominating it — a choice that strengthens the overall experience.

Directing

Stylistically, the film makes some interesting choices. There are touches reminiscent of Guy Ritchie’s filmmaking, but instead of flashy fight choreography or hyper-stylized violence, the style here is applied to technology and details. Phones, text messages, visual cues, and small observational elements — like what someone is wearing or how a detail is revealed — are given emphasis. It’s a smart way of modernizing the investigative style without turning the film into something it’s not.

The action, while present, is not the main attraction — and that’s perfectly fine. The action sequences are good, not great, but this isn’t an action film, so they don’t need to be. They serve the story adequately without hijacking it or feeling out of place.

Criticisms

That said, Mammootty’s age is something that’s noticeable here. Visually, he looks around 50, but his physical movement sometimes suggests someone much older — closer to his 70s. This creates a slight disconnect, especially since he continues to play relatively younger roles. Interestingly, I didn’t feel this issue in Bheeshma Parvam or Rorschach, where his physicality felt far more convincing. That suggests the problem might not be his age itself, but rather the execution and staging in this particular film.

There is also a song-and-dance sequence that feels completely out of place and frankly cringe-worthy. It immediately reminded me of the Anushka Shetty song sequence in near the start of Yennai Arindhaal, another GVM film. Tonally, it clashes with the rest of the movie and adds nothing meaningful to the narrative.

Additionally, there is one fight involving Mammootty that simply doesn’t work. It contradicts the level of skill and competence he displays in other confrontations. It’s obvious why this choice was made — political or narrative convenience — but it still feels forced. Saying more would spoil the film, but it stands out as a misstep.

Another area where the film could have been significantly stronger is the emotional core of the crime. The reasoning behind the crime and the emotional connect needed more time and depth. More energy should have been spent developing this aspect, especially the character of the purse’s owner. With a richer emotional foundation, the payoff would have been much more impactful.

Despite these flaws, the film remains a very enjoyable watch. It’s engaging, stylish in a restrained way, and driven by a standout performance from Mammootty. Most importantly, it feels like the work of a director who is once again fully invested in directing. For fans of GVM and character-driven investigative dramas, this film delivers more than enough to be satisfying.

Overall, a very nice watch — imperfect, but confident — and a reminder of why Gautham Menon remains such a compelling filmmaker when he’s truly in his element.

--

--