The TACO loop

To Claude:

How many events can you pattern match to this mechanism?

1. Trump makes a stupid decision
2. Something really bad happens
3. Trump convinces his followers the problem is now magically solved
4. Trump reverses the decision

Claude:

Let me think through this systematically.

The TACO Pattern: Documented Instances

1. Liberation Day Tariffs (April 2025)

1. Announces sweeping global tariffs with dramatic fanfare
2. Markets crash, trillions wiped out, business panic, allies retaliate
3. Declares the tariffs showed strength, other countries are now “respecting” America
4. 90-day pause, most tariffs never implemented

2. Greenland Crisis (January 2026)

1. Threatens invasion of NATO ally’s territory, tariffs on European allies
2. NATO solidarity strengthens, allies deploy troops to Greenland, diplomatic crisis
3. Announces “framework” deal, claims victory on Arctic security
4. Tariffs withdrawn, invasion rhetoric dropped

3. First Government Shutdown Threat (First Term)

1. Demands wall funding, refuses to sign budget
2. Longest shutdown in US history, federal workers suffer, airports chaos
3. Claims he’s fighting for border security, blames Democrats
4. Signs bill without wall funding, declares national emergency as face-saving measure

4. North Korea “Fire and Fury” (2017–2018)

1. Threatens nuclear war, “fire and fury like the world has never seen”
2. International alarm, allies panic, markets wobble
3. Pivots to summits, claims historic diplomacy, “we fell in love”
4. No denuclearization achieved, North Korea keeps weapons, Trump claims victory anyway

5. Iran Drone Strike (2019)

1. Orders military strike on Iran after drone shootdown
2. Planes in the air, strike imminent, risk of major war
3. Claims he saved 150 Iranian lives by calling it off, portrays himself as merciful
4. Strike cancelled ten minutes before execution

6. Family Separation Policy (2018)

1. Implements “zero tolerance” separating children from parents at border
2. Global outrage, images of children in cages, bipartisan condemnation
3. Claims Democrats forced this policy, he’s the one fixing it
4. Signs executive order ending the policy he implemented

7. Muslim Travel Ban — First Version (2017)

1. Signs sweeping ban on travelers from Muslim-majority countries
2. Airport chaos, legal challenges, courts block it, massive protests
3. Claims it’s about security, blames courts and Democrats
4. Revised multiple times until a narrower version survives legal challenge

8. Withdrawal from Syria — First Attempt (2018–2019)

1. Announces immediate, complete withdrawal of US troops
2. Allies blindsided, Kurds endangered, Mattis resigns in protest, bipartisan condemnation
3. Claims ISIS is defeated, mission accomplished
4. Withdrawal slowed, troops remain, policy essentially reversed

9. COVID Injection/Disinfectant Comments (2020)

1. Suggests injecting disinfectant might treat COVID, looking into UV light inside body
2. Medical community horrified, poison control calls spike, global mockery
3. Claims he was being “sarcastic” to test reporters
4. Never mentions it again, moves on

10. Buying Greenland — First Attempt (2019)

1. Floats idea of purchasing Greenland from Denmark
2. Denmark dismisses it as “absurd,” international ridicule
3. Calls Danish PM’s response “nasty,” cancels state visit
4. Quietly drops the idea (until 2026)

11. Threatening to Adjourn Congress (2020)

1. Threatens to use constitutional provision to adjourn Congress to make recess appointments
2. Constitutional scholars alarmed, bipartisan pushback
3. Claims he has the power, he’s just choosing not to use it
4. Never does it

12. Delaying Election Comments (2020)

1. Tweets about delaying the election due to mail-in voting concerns
2. Immediate bipartisan condemnation, even McConnell rejects it
3. Claims he’s just “asking questions” about election integrity
4. Election proceeds on schedule

13. Pardoning Himself Discussion (First Term)

1. Publicly discusses whether he can pardon himself
2. Legal and constitutional alarm, debate about limits of power
3. Claims he has the “absolute right” but doesn’t need to because he’s done nothing wrong
4. Never actually attempts it

14. Withdrawing from NATO Threats (First Term)

1. Repeatedly threatens to withdraw from NATO, calls it “obsolete”
2. Allies panic, defense establishments alarmed
3. Claims he’s just demanding fair burden-sharing
4. Remains in NATO, claims credit for increased allied spending

15. Minneapolis ICE Crisis (January 2026)

1. Sends 3,000 agents, aggressive tactics, “domestic terrorist” rhetoric
2. Two American citizens killed, video contradicts narrative, million-dollar GoFundMe, Republican cracks emerge
3. (In progress) Sending Homan suggests claiming he’s “fixing” the situation
4. (Likely) Operational de-escalation while claiming victory

The Pattern’s Core Logic

What these share:

Get Kevin O'Shaughnessy’s stories in your inbox

Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.

Remember me for faster sign in

Impulsivity without planning: The initial decision is made for emotional/political impact without thinking through consequences.

Reality intrudes: The world doesn’t cooperate. Markets crash. Allies resist. Courts intervene. People die. Video emerges.

Narrative pivot: Rather than admit error, construct a story where the problem is solved, was never that bad, or was someone else’s fault.

Quiet reversal: Change the actual policy while maintaining rhetorical position. Declare victory regardless of outcome.

The Enablers

This pattern only works because:

Media moves on. The news cycle doesn’t hold attention long enough to compare the initial announcement to the final outcome.

Base doesn’t care about consistency. Supporters follow Trump’s current position, not his previous one. If he says it’s a victory, it’s a victory.

Opposition exhaustion. Critics can’t maintain outrage across dozens of crises. Each new one displaces the last.

No accountability mechanism. Congress doesn’t hold him accountable. Courts are slow. The system isn’t designed for someone who does this repeatedly.

What It Reveals

This pattern reveals something important about Trump:

He’s not strategic. A strategic actor would think through consequences before acting. Trump acts, then reacts to consequences.

He’s not committed to outcomes. He doesn’t actually care whether North Korea denuclearizes, whether the wall gets built, or whether tariffs restructure trade. He cares about the appearance of winning.

He’s responsive to pressure. Despite the strongman rhetoric, he backs down when costs mount. The resistance isn’t futile — it just has to be sustained and visible enough.

He’s protected by chaos. The sheer volume of crises makes it impossible to hold him accountable for any single one. Each TACO cycle is forgotten as the next one begins.

The Count

By my count: at least 15 instances of this pattern that I can identify with reasonable confidence.

There are probably more I’m not recalling, and some might be debatable. But the pattern is robust enough that “Trump Always Chickens Out” appears to be genuinely predictive.

The tragedy is that the “something really bad happens” phase often involves real harm — children separated from parents, federal workers unpaid, markets crashed, and now people killed. The chickening out limits further damage but doesn’t undo what’s already done.

TACO means the worst outcomes are often avoided. It also means the worst outcomes are always risked before they’re avoided.