The EdTech Paradox: Why Scale Doesn’t Equal Sustainability
When the unicorn stumbled…
In January 2026, Unacademy ditches offline centres, eyes franchise profitability boost, the news rippled through India’s technology and education sectors. One of the country’s most ambitious EdTech ventures was choosing franchises over company-owned centres — a tactical pivot that on the surface makes sense: lighter balance sheets, fewer fixed assets, reduced capital intensity.
But this pivot tells a deeper story — a narrative about why India’s EdTech industry struggles to build sustainable models, despite record funding, ambitious valuations, and global attention.
The real problem? Scale doesn’t automatically mean sustainable success.
The pandemic effect: A boom built on borrowed time
Remember 2020? Classrooms shut, teachers scrambled online, and millions of students logged in from home. EdTech startups seemed poised to change education forever. Funding soared, valuations hit new highs, and a narrative emerged: technology will democratise education.
India’s EdTech sector was the poster child. Platforms like Unacademy, Byju’s, Vedantu and LEAD were seen as transformational players in a market with 300+ million learners and rapidly improving digital penetration.
However, this boom — while real in its short-term impact — also masked structural cracks.
Rapid growth, weak foundations
In 2021 and 2022, investors poured capital into the idea of scale at all costs. Large sales teams, aggressive marketing budgets, broad content catalogs, hybrid strategies, offline expansion — each became badges of ambition.
And for a moment, it worked: adoption spiked, revenues multiplied, growth stories solidified. Byju’s became the world’s most valuable EdTech startup, reaching a $22 billion valuation. Yet, behind those numbers, unit economics were strained and profitable cores were elusive.
Then reality struck.
The post-pandemic reckoning: Funding dries, fundamentals matter
Once classrooms reopened, growth patterns changed. Parents and learners still used EdTech — but often less frequently and more selectively. Funding that had buoyed optimistic expansion strategies began to pull back.
By 2024, sector funding in India had plummeted to roughly $0.64 billion, a shadow of its boom era. Startups across the sector faced cash constraints, layoffs increased, and aggressive expansions slowed.
According to industry analysts and reports:
- Over 2,100 EdTech startups shut down in the last 5 years, as the model that once underwrote rapid spending no longer held.
(Estimated from industry tracking sources and startup liquidation signals.) - Sector funding dropped sharply post-2023, trailing well below pandemic peaks.
- Legacy players had to reconsider capital-intensive pursuits like offline learning centres and broad course catalogs.
In short: the era of deep-pocketed scaling was ending, and the era of sustainability was only just beginning.
Unacademy’s pivot: A symbol of deeper challenges
The recent pivot by Unacademy — from company-run offline centres to a franchise model — might be framed as strategic repositioning. But it highlights core issues EdTech founders are now wrestling with:
- Asset intensity was dragging profitability.
- Operational complexity of centres proved costly.
- Retention and outcomes became harder to guarantee across broad, undifferentiated offerings.
Unacademy’s CEO described the franchise model as capital-efficient and asset-light, allowing local operators to run day-to-day work while Unacademy focuses on core academics and tech.
This is less about abandoning a growth vision and more about relearning the basics of business sustainability.
The uncomfortable truth: Trust is the product
We spend a lot of time talking about content, delivery, technology, AI, hybrid models, and market size. But in education, there’s one intangible that supersedes them all: trust.
Unlike entertainment or utility apps, an EdTech platform doesn’t just serve a customer — it partners in a learner’s growth journey. Results matter deeply: exam outcomes, skill acquisition, academic progression. Learners and parents don’t stick around for access, they stay for results.
Yet, for years the industry focused on user counts and course breadth over measurable learner outcomes. That’s why churn rates stayed high, lifetime value lagged unit economics, and early growth fizzled as acquisition costs rose.
Scaling before trust: A risky recipe
The pandemic compressed adoption cycles. What would normally take years of behaviour change happened in months. This led many startups to over-interpret the signal: If scale came quickly, surely sustainability would follow.
But this logic was flawed.
When acquisition outpaced conviction
Many EdTech companies equated scale with number of users rather than quality of engagement or learning outcomes. As a result:
- CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost) outpaced LTV (Lifetime Value).
- Discounts and promotions masked weak retention.
- Users churned quickly once initial curiosity subsided.
Today, companies that win are those that prioritize outcomes over eyeballs — a point echoed in strategic market advisories
The hybrid model dilemma
Another symptom of unfettered scaling was the shift to hybrid models — mixing online and offline. Unacademy and Vedantu both experimented with offline centres to bring balance to purely digital offerings.
Get Aayush Vashist’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Vedantu, for instance, reported revenue growth and narrowed losses but only while tightly managing operational costs.
But hybrid can also increase complexity — real estate, teacher management, franchise compliance — all at odds with lean digital models.
Broken models: Lessons from the broader industry
Unacademy isn’t alone. Across the sector, we’ve seen similar narratives:
- Byju’s, once the tallest player, faced severe valuation collapse and entered insolvency, illustrating that valuation without economics is unstable.
- Many startups scaled quickly only to realise their business models weren’t resilient enough once funding tightened. Sector layoffs and shutdowns increased, particularly in EdTech.
- Upgrades, acquisitions and consolidation talks (like Upgrad’s aborted acquisition of Unacademy) fell through, signaling investor caution and tough negotiations.
Each of these echoes the same theme: hyper-growth without unit economics breeds vulnerabilities.
A return to fundamentals: What sustainable scaling looks like
So if the old playbook is obsolete, what does sustainable EdTech growth look like?
1. Start with outcomes, not users
Sustainable growth happens when learners succeed and stay engaged. That means:
- Meaningful metrics: retention, mastery, completion, success stories.
- Outcome-linked payment models — where learners pay for delivered value.
- Less emphasis on vanity metrics like downloads.
Platforms that prioritise conviction over access are already showing better long-term prospects.
2. Lean go-to-market with precision
Gone are the days of cast a wide net and see what sticks. Today’s market rewards:
- Targeted segments where trust is earned (competitive exams, skill certs).
- Courses with clear entry and exit points.
- Community and mentoring, not just content libraries.
This is not just a strategic shift — it’s a survival imperative.
3. Clean economics over unfettered spending
Continue to manage CAC tightly. Build loyalty loops that increase retention without massive ad budgets. In education, referral, reputation, and word-of-mouth still outperform paid funnels.
4. Smart partnerships and hybrid innovation
Franchise models — like what Unacademy is adopting — are not inherently weaker; they shift risk to local operators. This makes sense when core value is content quality and tech platform, not real-estate leverage.
5. Tailored solutions for diverse markets
India’s education landscape is not monolithic. Urban, Tier-II, and rural regions differ significantly in access, preferences, and outcomes.
This is where emerging models, like AI-driven personalised learning for remote areas, show potential — especially when designed for equity and inclusion.
Emerging trends: A resilient second wave?
Despite the downturn, optimism is not extinct.
In 2025, funding rebounded significantly in the first half — more than fivefold compared to 2024, especially in study-abroad, workforce training, and AI language learning segments.
This signals that capital returns where fundamentals improve.
Newer EdTech ventures are focusing on:
- Upskilling and lifelong learning.
- Localised language and regional solutions.
- Outcome-driven micro-credentials.
- AI personalization that boosts retention.
Investors are no longer chasing scale for its own sake — they’re chasing unit economics and clear path to profitability.
The paradox resolved? Scaling with sustainability
The story of Indian EdTech over the past decade is not one of failure — but one of learning and evolution.
The initial wave proved that digital education can drive massive reach and accessibility. The next chapter is proving that reach must be grounded in trust, outcomes, and economic sense.
Unacademy’s franchise pivot isn’t just a tactical choice — it’s a signal that the industry is finally confronting its paradox:
Scale without sustainability is a mirage; sustainability without scale is slow, but real.
The future belongs to the companies that learn this lesson, build resilient business models, and embed trust into every learner interaction.
