Member-only story
The what on Terror and Winning It (Version II for those that keep pushing)
Comes from explaining to the farse in farsi
I approach it as follows:
The society which they always seem to poison
I give them the Copenhagen accord -
Fe (s) → Fe^(+2) (II) (aq) + 2e^(-1)
It is sol id → aque ou us + to elect == nobodies insolent!
Normally given the “final” oxidation of II that is red and rust or roast
Again you choose which side your on given your double agency(rate limiting steps)
I have done my work, and covered my bases, and listened in class
Redux reaction canonical is:
Cu (II) + Fe (s) → Cu (s) + Fe (II)
cuperate → ferrate
Litmus I think not!
They want to mix words have never honestly crossed words and therefore never learnt to love them in all their good meaning, or consider Gods meaning for us.
this is the nature of their asymmetrical warfare:
symmetry X asymmetry to symmetry
matrix[nXn] X matrix[OXn] → matrix[nXn]
their’s: symmetry X asymmetry to asymmetry
matrix[nXn] X matrix[OXn] not this but is:
