Fossil Fuel Executives Influence Governments and Media
Who could imagine such a development?
The Narwhal claims that “Fossil fuel execs outlined a 7-part playbook to influence governments and media. Here’s what you need to know” per title and pages of details.
I’ll cut to the seven claims, but add the context that CEOs and their minions do have influence over governments and such IS BAU (business as usual) since at least Roman times.
Get Eric Lee’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
The seven points of possible interest to the public were not for the public to consider, so for public information:
Claim 1:
“A really interesting thing about government is that you’ve got a lot of people, public servants, who are overworked and underpaid. And sometimes they just want the job done for them,” Iliffe [Liam Iliffe, then a TC Energy executive] said.
“We’ve been given opportunities to write entire briefing notes for ministers and premiers and prime ministers and it gets stuck on government letterhead and put into an envelope and into a briefing package that goes to that elected figure,” Iliffe added. “There’s nothing more powerful than that.”
That’s something denied by both the B.C. government and Natural Resources Canada. The federal department said briefing notes for high-level political and public officials are “developed by public servants. … External stakeholders have no role in drafting briefing notes, and are not privy to them.”
Iliffe, nevertheless, claimed his strategy had been successful, saying, “We’ve had some really remarkable results in terms of our message being repeated back to us by key decision makers in government.”
Claim 2:
You never know which senior government officials you might run into at the produce section at Costco. That’s an insight Iliffe shared during the internal call.
“You’d be surprised how much work I actually get done in the cooler at Costco because I bump into a significant minister or bureaucrat that I really want to spend some time with and I can do that next to the strawberries or the romaine lettuce,” he said.
“We spend time with influential bureaucrats,” Iliffe said. “They’re the ones who ultimately advise the premier and cabinet and if we can spend time with them and make certain that our messaging and our advice is landing on their letterhead, we have extra more solid validation of the message that we’re sending.”
A senior TC Energy vice president, Patrick Muttart, dismissed claims about Costco lobbying, telling the National Post it “doesn’t happen in the real world” and that the company has a “robust” framework to oversee lobbying, which is governed by laws at both the provincial and federal levels.
Claim 3:
“We were able to … mute opposition voices because we have an extraordinary and growing team that really focuses on opposition research,” said in March. “They’re based in Washington, D.C. They’re watching over the entire company and can highlight to us what’s in the news, what ohr opposition folks saying online and give us opportunities to blunt, mute and sometimes even reverse opposition voices.”
“We spend a lot of time influencing the media landscape,” he added. “We have had opportunities to shape stories, place stories, develop positive stories that in some instances as a corporation, try to stop negative stories that either were not true or really, really harmed us in some way that was irreparable.”
A month before Iliffe’s statement, on the other leaked recording, a Washington D.C.-based TC Energy executives took credit for a Wall Street Journal editorial published on Feb. 15, 2024. Titled “Biden’s LNG ‘Gift’ to Vladimir Putin” and signed by the newspaper’s editorial board, it criticized President Joe Biden for announcing a pause on liquefied natural gas exports (that move was blocked by a Republican-appointed federal judge earlier this week).
“I wouldn’t say this much outside the walls of the TC tower, but this editorial wouldn’t have happened without our involvement,” Edward Burrier, a former White House staffer who is now TC Energy’s director of public policy, said on the call. “Our communications team packaged that for the Journal editorial page and they went with it … so some really impactful teamwork there.”
A spokesperson for the Wall Street Journal said the paper does “not comment on sourcing and/or editorial processes.” TC Energy did not respond to questions about the editorial or the opposition research group.
Claim 4:
Iliffe claimed TC Energy staffers reached out to “international thought leaders and diplomats” to influence B.C. Premier David Eby when he was first elected. “We know that premiers, when they go to countries, have dinners with ambassadors,” he said. “That’s a one-on-one period of time that an ambassador can deliver our message.”
“Leveraging our relationships allowed us to have Canadian ambassadors abroad deliver a pro-LNG message to a premier who was skeptical at the time.”
He said when Eby and some of his cabinet ministers went to Asia on a trade mission in 2023, TC Energy reached out to ambassadors ahead of time to brief them on desired messaging.
The result, Iliffe said, was “a marked shift in language when [Eby] came home.”
“We have a shift in government position, a clear shift. We have public comments and policy development that are positive for TC Energy’s initiatives being made daily by the British Columbia government. We didn’t find ourselves there a year ago.” Iliffe said the company has worked to shift Eby’s views since October 2022, when he said expanding fossil fuel infrastructure would make climate goals impossible to reach.
A spokesperson for Eby denied Iliffe’s claims, saying they were “self-aggrandizing” with “no basis in reality.” Whether or not TC Energy’s efforts were the cause, Eby released a video last month endorsing the partially Indigenous-owned Cedar LNG project as a “shining example of how natural resource development should work with our province, in full partnership with First Nations, in line with our commitments to fight climate change.”
Former TC Energy exec Liam Iliffe claimed the company succeeded in changing B.C. Premier David Eby’s tune on support for natural gas projects, citing the premier’s position on the Cedar LNG export terminal in Kitimat as an example. The province approved construction of that project, which is partly owned by the Haisla Nation, in 2023.
Global Affairs Canada said Canada’s Trade Commissioner Service — a network of diplomats who promote Canadian businesses from embassies and consulates in more than 160 cities abroad — helps Canadian oil and gas companies “sell their products and services outside Canada.”
Muttart, the senior vice-president at TC Energy, confirmed to the National Post that the company is “informing, educating and engaging with not just Canadian diplomats but other diplomats representing other countries.”
Claim 5:
As politicians, cabinets and decision makers come and go, Iliffe said, “we always have to make certain that we’re shoring that up and bringing validators through our relationships — from communities, Indigenous people, Indigenous leaders and the general public — to government.”
The strategy, Iliffe said, would help politicians be “confident that they can make the positive decisions without affecting their voter base which drives a lot of decision making.”
On the February leaked internal call Burrier was asked for advice from a speaker in B.C. who said “we’re really having … problems getting traction with [First Nations]” for the Prince Rupert natural gas transmission pipeline. While TC Energy secured agreements with some First Nations governments along the route of the pipeline when it first sought — and received — approval from B.C. in 2014, not all communities remain supportive.
In response to the question, Burrier characterized Indigenous involvement in fossil fuel development as a competitive edge. As an example, he referred to the Cedar LNG project co-owned by Haisla Nation, and the presence of the nation’s Chief Crystal Smith at a 2023 liquefied natural gas conference in Vancouver as an example.
“Every CEO sits up there and talks about these LNG projects around the world and they all sound the same,” Burrier said. “But then Chief Crystal got up and said, ‘I’m with Haisla Nation and we used to have to manage poverty, now we have to figure out how to manage wealth.’ ”
“That’s the force multiplier, to use one of the words of the hour, that we have on our side.”
Claim 6:
“We spend a lot of time in that ecosystem shaping media outcomes,” Iliffe said in March. Iliffe claimed media-influencing tactics had been useful when Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs were in Toronto in 2023 to protest natural gas development. Iliffe said that because protestors were targeting sources of pipeline financing, TC Energy had to do so as well.
Former TC Energy Liam Iliffe exec claimed TC Energy’s tactics resulted in media coverage that was favourable to the company when it came to action led by Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs in Toronto, protesting Royal Bank of Canada’s funding of the Coastal GasLink pipeline.
“So we redeployed with a geofence social media campaign to make certain that our financiers were aware that we were aware of it — that they knew we were doing what we were trying to do — and the media covering the event during saw our ads while they opened social media or any news coverage.”
His efforts, he said, were “remarkably effective.”
“It really actually did drive some more positive news stories or at least it added balance and in a lot of the times, balance is a win.”
Claim 7:
Burrier said one example of “successful shots fired” in Canada was how the company lobbied the federal government around the Impact Assessment Act, through which decision makers consider environmental impacts when approving or rejecting major industrial development projects.
The Trudeau government is amending the act after the Supreme Court of Canada found it to be unconstitutional last fall, but Burrier suggested TC Energy was behind the openness to changes that benefit industry.
“As many on this call will remember, early last year the Canadian government had two sentences in their proposal saying that they wanted to make improvements on its permitting process,” he said in the recording. “We used that as our opening. We produced for government a deliberate, thoughtful, 20-plus-page paper with recommendations.”
“We literally did the government’s homework for them,” he added.
A spokesperson with the Impact Assessment Agency said the agency “did not receive any submissions from TC Energy on amendments to the Impact Assessment Act.”
