Learning Together, Thinking Differently
It’s easy to think that more people in a conversation can lead to more ideas, knowledge, and better communities. After looking at Nicky Case’s interactive explorable and reading Dave Cormier’s ideas on a pro-social web, I realise that community isn’t about how many people are in it but how they interact and respond to each other. Depending on those dynamics, a group might foster genuine curiosity and growth, or slide into misinformation, echo chambers, and groupthink.
The main thing that stood out to me from Nicky Case’s interactive explorable, The Wisdom and/or Madness of Crowds, was how much the social network affected how people acted. It was interesting to see that the same people in a group, but in different structures, could lead to different results. Through the simulations, I saw that if people weren’t connected enough, then important ideas and knowledge couldn’t flow through the group. Whereas if everyone was connected, then groupthink could occur. The most interesting thing to me was that changing a few connections could change how a group would act. I found it really interesting that a crowd can become wiser by having the right balance between connections and independent thinking. This reinforced the idea that just because you are part of a community doesn’t mean you have to agree with everything. Sometimes the best contributions can come from those who are willing to question ideas.
Get Anonymous Mango’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
This really ties into Dave Cormier’s post about creating a pro-social web. I like how he puts emphasis on our responsibility for the internet. We are responsible for creating the internet we see. A pro-social web is about creating an online space where people feel comfortable sharing their ideas, asking questions, learning, and respectfully disagreeing with others. Instead of focusing on negative interactions, popularity, and being “right”, we should be creating a space where people can work together. This is especially important within education so students feel supported.
I see this crowd dynamic play out all the time in nursing school. During group study sessions or case discussions, it’s very easy for everyone to agree with the first answer someone puts forward if no one speaks up. While study groups are fantastic for pooling strengths and working through tough concepts, they quickly lose their value if we just fall into line with whoever speaks up first. In healthcare, that isn’t just an academic issue. If we rely on faulty information, it can ultimately impact patient care. I can see the same pattern on educational social media and online study forums. Ideas spread like wildfire, but popularity doesn’t guarantee accuracy.
Thinking about these ideas has made me think more about my responsibility within digital learning communities. As a nursing student hoping to work in pediatric inpatient care, I know that I will need to work with my colleagues, ask questions, share knowledge, and be open to different perspectives. I also have a responsibility to provide accurate information and be willing to voice my concerns. I want to help create environments where people are comfortable admitting they don’t know something, as this is an important part of learning and becoming a better nurse.
Overall, both of these readings have reminded me that a good community isn’t just about being connected but being purposeful with our interactions. We all play a part in creating our environment, whether it be within a class, hospital, or online learning. I think creating a wiser and more supportive learning community starts with understanding that our individual actions can have a much larger impact than we think.
-A
