The Road to Abundance as Revelation
The Invisible Interdependence Beneath Every Dream of Autonomy
There is a modern fantasy that abundance solves everything. More energy, more automation, more intelligence, more productivity, and therefore less friction, less dependence, less burden. A world in which the hard facts of social life are gradually transcended. Work becomes optional. Material scarcity fades. Human beings become freer, more sovereign. The future arrives as release from scarcity and in that release, the individual is finally free, just as the old dreams always promised.
That fantasy is attractive not only because it promises comfort, but because it promises escape from older truths: that we remain vulnerable, that we rely on one another, that every stable world rests on maintenance, duty, trust and limits.
But the closer one looks, the less convincing that fantasy becomes. The road to abundance does not dissolve dependence. It reveals it. The more advanced and automated a civilisation becomes, the more it depends on dense layers of coordination that most people never see. Energy grids. Supply chains. Data centres. Water systems. Rare minerals. Logistics networks. Skilled maintenance. Social trust. Institutional legitimacy. Political order. Far from floating above the old realities, the advanced world sits on top of them more completely than ever.
Every path toward a more abundant future assumes an immense energy transition, functioning supply chains, technological breakthroughs, access to critical materials, enough political stability to build over decades, and enough social cohesion to hold things together while the transition takes place. In other words, it assumes not the abolition of constraint, but the successful management of many constraints at once.
And once you see that, something else becomes harder to ignore. The road to abundance is not only technical. It is civilisational. It asks whether societies that have become psychologically accustomed to individualism, low trust, symbolic fragmentation and brittle institutions are actually capable of sustaining the degree of mutual reliance that advanced abundance would require.
This is where the modern picture becomes strange. We are told a story in which better technology liberates us from dependence. But in practice, the systems that make high-functioning modern life possible bind us more tightly to strangers, infrastructures and institutions we do not control. Your food arrives because thousands of people you will never meet did their jobs. Your electricity holds because maintenance was performed on systems you barely understand. Your digital life works because hidden technical and material layers continue to function without interruption. The road to abundance does not make us less reliant on one another. It makes reliance less visible, until a shock makes it obvious again.
That matters because invisibility changes moral perception. When dependence is hidden, people imagine themselves as self-authored. They experience society less as an inheritance or a shared project than as a platform for personal navigation. The fantasy of autonomy expands precisely as actual interdependence deepens. And that creates a peculiar kind of blindness. We keep talking as if the future is a matter of innovation and consumer gain, while ignoring the degree to which any advanced future depends upon trust, sacrifice, restraint and people continuing to do necessary things for one another.
In that sense, the road to abundance is revelatory because it strips away some illusions while intensifying others. It shows how much modern civilisation still depends on old virtues it no longer knows how to name very well. Reliability. Competence. Duty. Shared standards. Maintenance. Loyalty to systems larger than the self. The more complex the world becomes, the less dispensable those things are.
Get András Dobos’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
This is also why the transition toward abundance is not merely an economic story. It is a story about anthropology. It confronts us again with the question the older essays kept circling: what kind of creatures are we, really? Are we best understood as consumers, optimisers and preference-maximisers, moving frictionlessly through systems designed for convenience? Or are we dependent, symbolic, meaning-hungry creatures who need role, belonging, reciprocity and limits in order to remain recognisably human? The old maps fail precisely because they isolate one part of the human picture and mistake it for the whole.
The road to abundance exposes that failure. It reveals that a society cannot simply produce more and call the human problem solved. It can extend provision while hollowing out participation. It can increase efficiency while weakening meaning. It can multiply comforts while leaving people more dependent, more passive, more managed and less at home in their own world. Material improvement is real. But it does not answer the deeper question of what kind of life the system is actually producing.
This is one reason I have become more cautious about speaking of abundance as if it were self-evidently liberating. Even if very high levels of provision become technically possible, that does not mean they will be humanly easy to inhabit. A world can feed you, heat you, entertain you and optimise around you while still failing to provide the conditions that make life feel liveable in the deeper sense: agency, territory, belonging, role, the sense that your effort matters and that you are participating in something real. Material sufficiency and inhabitability are not the same thing.
That is where 2048 enters the argument. The novel is not about universal post-scarcity finally arriving and redeeming history. It is about a world in which higher levels of provision exist locally, unevenly and under pressure. But even there, the deeper point is not simply that abundance is patchy. It is that the path which made those enclaves possible has already revealed the structure beneath the dream. A world of automation and limited abundance still rests on coordination, exclusion, maintenance, pressure and unequal exposure to risk.
2048’s Caledonia matters in that context not because it answers the question, but because it sharpens it. It is an island of competence, resilience and relative stability. It demonstrates that under sufficient concentration of resources, planning and control, something like a functioning enclave can still be built. But its existence also reveals the price of that achievement. Abundance, where it appears, is not floating free of history. It is defended, managed, and dependent on wider systems that remain strained and unequal.
That is why the road to abundance becomes a challenge to values. It does not simply ask whether we can build more powerful systems. It asks what we are willing to become in order to build and sustain them. How much control, how much dependence, how much exclusion, how much moral narrowing are we prepared to accept in exchange for continuity and provision? What kind of human being is formed by a civilisation that can still produce islands of stability, but only through ever tighter layers of management and ever more fragile forms of interdependence?
So the road to abundance is revelatory in a double sense. It reveals the structural reality of modern civilisation: how much must hold together, how many people must keep working for one another, how much trust and competence must be preserved, for advanced life to function at all. And it reveals the inadequacy of our dominant moral languages, which still struggle to speak honestly about dependence, obligation, sacrifice and the kinds of shared meaning without which no complex society remains habitable.
In that sense, the real question is no longer whether abundance is coming. It is what the attempt to reach it is showing us about ourselves.
Not that human beings can transcend dependence, but that dependence was always the deeper truth. Not that technology frees us from one another, but that it binds us more tightly while making the bond harder to see. Not that the future will rescue us from the human condition, but that the road we are on is forcing that condition back into view.
And that may be the most important revelation of all. The road to abundance does not simply promise more. It confronts us with what a viable civilisation has always required, and with how badly we have forgotten it.
The e-book version will be out soon.
