Fidelity Through Movement
A poetic meditation
There is an old lie we were told before we could even speak: that love, to be real, must stay still. That the heart is a house, and to love truly is to lock its doors, to guard its windows, to make sure nothing enters or leaves without permission. We built temples to this lie. We called it loyalty. We called it devotion. We called it, sometimes, marriage. But nothing alive has ever stayed still and remained alive for long.
Watch the sea. It does not choose one shore and abandon all others out of virtue. It touches every coastline it can reach — the rocky ones, the sandy ones, the ones no one visits — and it does this every single day, without shame, without apology. Is the sea unfaithful? No one who has stood at its edge at dawn would say so. The sea is the most faithful thing on this earth, because its faithfulness is not to a place but to its own nature — to touching, to returning, to giving itself completely to whatever shore it meets, and then meeting the next one with the same completeness. This is fidelity through movement. Not the fidelity of the lock, but the fidelity of the wave.
Tagore knew this. He wrote of love as a bird that must be let out of the cage each morning if it is ever to come back and sing. He knew that a caught thing stops singing — it only survives. And what is love that merely survives? He wrote, too, of the river that touches a thousand banks on its way to the sea, and no bank ever accuses the river of betrayal, because everyone standing on the bank understands: the river was never for them alone. It was for the going. The joy was in being touched by something that was also touching the whole world, and somehow, in that vastness, still finding you particular, still slowing near your bank, still leaving a little more silt, a little more sweetness, right there where you stood.
Get Anusha Garg’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
Osho would have laughed at our locks. He would have said: you cannot possess a flame, you can only stand near it and be warmed, and the moment you try to trap the flame in a box to keep it “yours,” you put it out — and then you are left holding a box with nothing in it, calling that nothing “loyalty.” He would have said that jealousy is not love’s proof but love’s failure to trust itself. That two people who are truly free are far more likely to stay, because nothing binds them but the wanting — and wanting freely given, morning after morning, is worth infinitely more than wanting extracted through fear.
And Neruda would have written the body of it. He would have made you feel it in fruit and salt and skin — an orange that gives its whole sweetness to whoever eats it and is not thereby diminished, is not “less orange” for having been tasted fully. He would have said that scarcity is not what makes love valuable; the ocean is not less itself for being vast, the rose is not less fragrant for being smelled by every passerby on the street. He would have written that to love someone freely is not to love them less, but to love them the way July loves an entire orchard — every fruit, every bee, every falling petal held in the same reckless, ripening yes.
So perhaps this is the truth hiding underneath all three of them: fidelity was never about staying in one place. It was always about the quality of your attention wherever you are. A person who loves freely and loves fully, right now, right here, with everything they have — that person is not less faithful than the one behind the locked door. They may, in fact, be the only one who has understood what faithfulness ever meant.
Because water that is dammed does not stay pure. It stagnates. It grows heavy with what it cannot release. But water that is allowed to move — that touches, and returns, and touches again — that water stays clean. That water stays alive. That water can still hold your reflection, clearly, the next time you kneel beside it.
This is not a permission to be careless. The sea does not touch shores carelessly — it arrives with its whole weight, every time. The freedom is not the absence of devotion; it is devotion without the leash. It is the difference between a bird that stays because the door is locked, and a bird that stays because, every morning, it chooses the same window again.
Love, then, is not the wall. Love is the willingness to keep returning — not because you must, but because, of everywhere you could be, this is still where you want to arrive.
