swipe left on “opposites attract”
As society, especially romance readers, we have grown up romanticising the concept of opposite attraction.
Two people different in every means possible colliding and magically becoming whole.
Sounds romantic no?
But this is all it is — magic. Not reality.
This idea has been stretched far beyond its meaning, almost making us believe that people who are opposites in all imaginable ways can somehow sustain in harmony. That’s where misconceptions begin.
When it is said opposites attract, we picture extremes — wildly extroverted partner and painfully introverted one, hyper-organised planner and last-minute organiser, stability chaser and thrill lover — and every other possible dramatic contradiction that romantic movies love to throw at us.
These are not charming quirks, but life philosophies. Entire belief systems. And when the fundamentals of two people are so drastically contrasting, I bet there will be a little space of romanticism. The friction amongst them will be more exhausting and tiring. To change your fundamental idea to keep up with the pace of other. Does it seem realistic at all?
Opposites do not become compatible because the idea is cinematically plausible. Compatibility isn’t about complementing each other’s edges, but sharing the same core foundation.
Get Archix’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
People often quote this magnet analogy — ‘Opposite ends of magnet attract.’
Yes. It is true, both in physics and real life. But due to reasons different than people assume.
In a magnet, the opposite poles attract because the magnetic field alignment is the same. That is, the principle axis points in a complementary direction. Therefore, they attract not because they are completely different, but because they share the same internal organisation, the same core identity.
So even in physics, opposites aren’t chaotic strangers coming together — they are two ends of the same field.
Even nature itself cannot sustain anything which contrasts each other. A natural environment, a habitat, an ecosystem is created upon co-habitation and compatibility of its surroundings, otherwise all it would ever be is accumulation of contrasts.
Polar bears are never seen in desert or cacti thriving in the Arctic. Nature is not impressed by contrast. It cherishes shared conditions.
The symbiotic relationships which forms the classic examples of ‘opposites sustaining each other’ work not because the partners are opposites, but because their roles align within the same ecological objective. A bee and a flower aren’t opposites. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria and legumes aren’t opposites of two poles. They are just perfectly complementary.
So, maybe the idea of ‘opposites attract’ was never about contrast and contradiction. Maybe it was more about complementarity and compatibility.
Not two entirely different people forcing themselves into a shape that doesn’t fit, but two people slightly different in ways that enhance, not erase, each other.
For this piece, I would like to give an honourable mention to my elder brother💛 who inspired this one. Thanks for giving me a new perspective.
